Uncle Sparky said:
Nope Silver Wang........just intertaining my own childish perversions?! My knowledge of the Legacy doesn't extend beyond my observation of the miles of runway that I've watched the ERJ consume at my local airport. I take it you like the little fellas? Why is it that they seem to eat so much runway? Are they being really conservative with the power or do those engines produce the thrust equivalent of a standard household oscillating fan?
I'm just a sucker for the underdog..... Heh there are so many bashin the Legacy i thought somebody should at least point out the other side of the story. Sure I like em.... have flown in them, and Gulftsreams (GIVSP, GV, Galaxy and F2000 and F20, H800XP, BE400A, CE750 etc etc) PAX only.....(actually the only way to form a realistic judgement). I'm engineer, so you get to see both sides.
There seem to be some Legacy jocks now defending the little 'un..... so I don't need to be into this anymore...and I got a life to lead.
So....back to your points.
Watch how much runway a g-string uses with 40+ pax and luggage on board........!!!!
Anyway, the Legacy is basically an ERJ135 with the highest thurst engines available for the ERJ-145 (The R-R AE3007 A1E.....)......OK so they ain't Tay's but they're still pushin and at ISA+22C about the highest flat rated about and with FADEC's.
On the basis there are never any Legacy numbers.....I thought I'd add this into the pot. Sure they aren't going to set hearts on fire...but it does the job.
SMO to TEB 24kt tail wind (Boeing 85%) (Climb and descent with wind. M0.78 FL410 Flight time 4:52 with fuel a shade under 10,000lbs, carrying 8 pax and baggage (about 2,000lb load), temps (ISA +9 at SMO 85%July temp).
TEB to SMO 68kt headwind (Boeing 85%) (Climb and descent with wind. M0.78 FL390 (OK wrong but only a calc) Flight time 5:54 with fuel a shade under 13,100lbs, carrying 8 pax and baggage (about 2,000lb load), temps (ISA +13 at TEB 85%July temp).
Only aircraft that I see competes on the value stakes is the CL300...and that is a might less of a cabin (65% less cabin volume) for a 4 to 5 hour run and a whole lot less baggage capacity (not even half the baggage in fact 240cu ft to 106 cu ft)....but there are gonna be different views on this for sure.
I haven't flown on a CL300. Have flown a CL604.... nice, quiet....wide.....SHORT. looking forward to trying a CL300 someday.