appreciate all the opinions..
its a hard choice.
I'm single. and have never commuted.. and don't plan to.
i moved to Atlanta for AT and would move to where I'm based at UAL too, probably Denver.
Just would be nice to have that crystal ball. See what the future holds for either place.
Be it status quo, or up or down. IF i was a capt. at AT, i wouldn't leave. but as a 737 fo who plans on waiting to upgrade in 737 (prefer longer legs, transcons, and don't want to go thru 717 training just to bid out at 1st opportunity) its a different story. i also miss the world wide non rev benefits of my last airline.
But giving up close to 25% relative seniority to be on the bottom of UAL is a big gamble. They aren't growing, no aircraft on order and looking to merge. i wonder how they are hiring 400 or so pilots in 2008 as it is.
Its a crazy industry, years ago it would have no brainier. now i simply don't know.
thanks for all the replys though.
Basing isn't an issue with you, and DEN has been given to newhires.
If you prefer the longer legs (as do I, which is why SWA was not even considered by me), UAL is your better choice.
You should be able to get a 767 in relatively short order at UAL. In the last vacancy bid, there were quite a few 767s. Certainly MUCH faster than 5 years, assuming that everything remains status quo.
I can't speak on whether or not it'd be better to stay where you're at or move to UAL.
We're going into a recession, so air traffic is likely to decrease. I don't know which would be more effected - United or Airtran.
Is Airtran still getting subsidies from some of the cities they serve? If so, I'd expect that to decrease due to tightening municipal budgets.
Are most Airtran pilots flying max hours? The pilots at United are flying more than they want to, so a decrease in block hours would be considered good for a lot of United pilots.