Is there really a shortage of Mechanics too?

[nickgutnick]

The work both do is not hard. It may be time consuming, but it's not intellectually taxing.

Really.......what an odd thing to say. So you're saying we are all a bunch of goobers in coveralls?

 

[acpilot]

Really.......what an odd thing to say. So you're saying we are all a bunch of goobers in coveralls?

Absolutely not! If that's what I meant to say, I would have said it.

 

[pipejockey]

A four year degree is irrelevant, and is inconsequential to pilot training. A four year degree has no more bearing on obtaining an FAA certificate for a pilot than it does to a mechanic obtaining FAA certification.

Obviously this avbug guy has no respect for pilots. You need to educate yourself on a few things before making such outrageous statements. 96% of Legacy Carrier pilots have 4 year degrees. It is highly unlikely one will be hired by a Legacy without one. So while it may not have any bearing on pilot training or obtaining an FAA certificate, it has every bearing in the world on obtaining a job at a Legacy, which is where most all of us set our sights when getting involved in this profession. Delta even has it listed as a requirement. Those in charge of hiring are not going to bother hiring someone without a 4 year degree when they have tons of applicants WITH a 4 year degree. Thus making it necessary for us all to have one.

Far Far less than 96% of mechanics have 4 year degrees, making it truly irrelevant in that profession.

A pilot may fly one type of large, complex airplane, with a type rating, whereas a mechanic may work on dozens without any such restrictions...and is expected to be capable and able. A pilot is relieved of this expectation with the simple requisite that he or she must first obtain type specific training.

A mechanic works on an aircraft that is shut down at the gate or in the hangar with all the time in the world to work on the particular system and peruse through the manuals to make sure things are done right. A pilot must sometimes make split second decisions with the aircraft moving at a very high rate of speed either on the ground or in flight and can't have the specifics of several different aircraft floating around in his mind. Therefore in the interest of safety, we learn the particular aircraft we actually operate in real world conditions with a bunch of people in the back whose lives depend on us. If a mechanic proceeds to screw something up, and it bites us in flight, pilots are generally able to overcome the mistake due to the redundancy in the systems, albeit with a lot of work.

A pilot, when flying an airplane, is not responsible for the flights performed by other pilots on previous flights. A mechanic performing an inspection, however, buys the entire history of the airplane with his or her signature. That includes the responsibility for certifying that all previous work is in order and correct.

So what?? You look at what is required on the particular inspection, and if it is still within parameters, you give it the ok and sign it off. What's the big deal? And a pilot WILL be thrown under the bus if they take an aircraft that a mechanic "forgot" to sign off or implemented an MEL incorrectly etc.

Pilots incur considerably less liability.

I can't believe what I'm reading here. We put our license on the line at the very least, every time we arrive at the aircraft. Try making a simple mistake like a busted altitude that results in a loss of separation, a simple dumb thumbs mistake programming the FMS resulting in the aircraft proceeding to the wrong fix resulting in a loss of separation, etc etc, and voila, no more license and no more job. Not to mention the litany of more serious mistakes that can cause loss of life or limb.

I've been working commercially as a pilot since I was a teenager, which was some time ago, now.

So why do you have so little respect for pilots then? But I bet you'd welcome the CEO with open arms and give him a big hug and thank him for all the important work he does for the bargain price of "insert some denomination in the many millions".

Pilots are a dime a dozen. Only about 10% of the pilots out there are worth their weight in salt. I'd rather spend my time with a group of mechanics, than pilots, given the choice. The requirements to be a pilot tend to pale overall in comparison to that of a mechanic.

Thanks! I have the utmost respect for you as well. And most of the mechanics I see at my company barely have command of the English language let alone the professionalism required to be in view of the public.

Cute, but nonsensical. What's left, you ask? Do you mean to say that a pilot who has been furloughed, downgraded, lost his medical, violated, failed a check ride, terminated, or killed can turn to being a mechanic? Not without taking considerably more training than it took to be the pilot, and not without a considerably greater investment in effort and time than it took to learn to fly.

Not according to the A&P's I sometimes fly with. So if a mechanic got furloughed and wanted to become a pilot, it would be a cake walk? Half of the mechanics around today wouldn't get through flight training.

 

[pipejockey]

As the pilot with that one type, you're very limited in your qualification and capability. As the mechanic with the most basic certification and two ratings...airframe and powerplant, working on any aircraft is a possibility. Not worrying about working on one single type...but all, everything. Translated in comparison to pilot certification, being a mechanic is equivilent to being a pilot certified to fly everything...all type ratings, all categories, all classes, all certifications.

If you really are a pilot, then you would realize that in order to be trained to Part 121 airline standards, there would be no way anyone without a photographic memory could possibly remember all of the different limitations, different profiles, different memory items, and different procedures of all of an airlines equipment types. See, these are things a pilot must know cold, without the luxury of referencing a handy mx manual.

When I work on an airplane, I have no concern whether you ever get in it, much less fly it. I work on it because I'm paid to do so, and I do it to the standards provided by the FAA, the manufacturer, and industry standards, without any concern for you. None at all.

What an arrogant, pompous a** pri*k this guy is! Just doing things to standards without any regards to peoples safety. I'd love to know what airline this clown works for because I would not let anyone I know get on any of their aircraft. And I would direct them to this guys statement about not having any concern for ones safety. This guy is a loose cannon waiting to snap. Such contempt for another group of professionals he has to work with. This is the kind of guy you expect to hear about walking in to work with armed to the hilt with assault weapons and taking as many of his co-workers out as he can. His first stop would no doubt be the pilots crew room. How sad for this guy.

 

[avbug]

Obviously this avbug guy has no respect for pilots.

Certainly not folks such as yourself; that's for certain.

You need to educate yourself on a few things before making such outrageous statements. 96% of Legacy Carrier pilots have 4 year degrees. It is highly unlikely one will be hired by a Legacy without one. So while it may not have any bearing on pilot training or obtaining an FAA certificate, it has every bearing in the world on obtaining a job at a Legacy, which is where most all of us set our sights when getting involved in this profession.

Far Far less than 96% of mechanics have 4 year degrees, making it truly irrelevant in that profession.

The absolute arrogance of you, in assuming that everyone wants to fly for a legacy carrier, or that such positions represent the bulk of pilot positions out there! Utter claptrap.

Your degree didn't help your comprehension any, as you failed to read what I wrote. I stated correctly that a degree has no bearing on obtaining an FAA certificate.

You want to educate me, do you? My flying experience includes international large four engine turbojet operations through single engine seaplane flying. How about yours?

Then again, can you legally repair an aircraft, perform modifications, or sign off an inspection and approve an airframe or powerplant for return to service? Or do you merely fly? I do both. You?

A degree has nothing to do with flying an airplane. It may be a preferred attribute when applying at Delta...but who really cares? It's irrelevant to the subject at hand.

A mechanic works on an aircraft that is shut down at the gate or in the hangar with all the time in the world to work on the particular system and peruse through the manuals to make sure things are done right.

That's one of the duties we do. But only a part, and for your very limited information, I've done plenty of work under pressure ranging from combat conditions to operations in flight, as a mechanic and inspector. You?

A pilot must sometimes make split second decisions with the aircraft moving at a very high rate of speed either on the ground or in flight and can't have the specifics of several different aircraft floating around in his mind.

Get off your high horse there, brightspark. You fly instrument procedures in a very controlled environment. How much of your career have you spent performing high-pressure, in-flight emergency operations in a high risk environment? I've done it a great deal of mine...as a pilot...and your casual, sheltered view doesn't hold much water.

You look at what is required on the particular inspection, and if it is still within parameters, you give it the ok and sign it off. What's the big deal?

Your uneducated and uninformed view is a good reason why people like you shouldn't be working on aircraft.

We put our license on the line at the very least, every time we arrive at the aircraft.

When a pilot operates an aircraft, the pilot is responsible for his or her work in real time, for the duration of the flight, and nothing more.

When a mechanic signs off an aircraft, the mechanic is responsible for everything that's been done to that aircraft, and for the work done by everyone who did it.

Big, big difference there, mate. Big difference. Liability as a pilot doesn't come remotely close to that of a mechanic in detail or in scope.

So why do you have so little respect for pilots then?

So few deserve it, and so few earn it. You've failed in that measure, as well.

And most of the mechanics I see at my company barely have command of the English language let alone the professionalism required to be in view of the public.

You've clearly got a prejudiced, uneducated, rather ignorant and biased view of the maintenance community. Certainly no understanding, thereof. Perhaps you need to work for a better company. It would appear that you're not one of those special legacy pilots, then? How unfortunate for you.

So if a mechanic got furloughed and wanted to become a pilot, it would be a cake walk?

What has that to do with the price of tea in China?

A mechanic who desires to be a pilot needs only undertake the same flight training that anyone undertakes. Such training is available at an unending number of sources. For a scant 250 hours of flying, one walks away with a commercial certificate, as a teacher of other pilots, ready to take on the world.

Half of the mechanics around today wouldn't get through flight training.

You base this statistic on published, reliable numbers, do you? No? You have no credibility. You're inventing statistics, which is therefore, a lie. this is how you present your point, by lying? This isn't surprising. Do you base your statistics upon having instructed half the mechanics around today? Of course you haven't, and to suggest you have would be...a lie. Why not be honest, instead?

If you really are a pilot, then you would realize that in order to be trained to Part 121 airline standards, there would be no way anyone without a photographic memory could possibly remember all of the different limitations, different profiles, different memory items, and different procedures of all of an airlines equipment types. See, these are things a pilot must know cold, without the luxury of referencing a handy mx manual.

You have an overinflated view of your job, or perhaps merely find it too difficult. You might wish to consider a different profession.

And I would direct them to this guys statement about not having any concern for ones safety.

That four year degree of yours isn't doing you much good. Your comprehension is still hovering right around 0%.

For starters, put words in your own mouth...not mine. I said nothing about having no concern for anyone's safety. Do you do this poorly at understanding everything you read, or are you merely selective in your failings?

I have zero concern regarding whether you get in an airplane upon which I work. None. I couldn't care less if you sit in your car, or go watch a movie. I'm not paid by help you into the pilot's seat, I'm not paid to care about you, or be concerned in the least about your feelings, attitude, or performance. Merely to perform the job to which I'm assigned.

At the moment, that job is acting in the capacity of professional ATP pilot...operating internationally. I don't spend my time lounging about crew rooms, whining about maintenance. I do my job, and move on.

I understand you may feel inadequate, given your obvious limitations in capability, to say nothing of certification, but it shouldn't jade your views. merely because you're less qualified than others doesn't diminish your worth as a person. Your credibility is at rock bottom and you're inventing lies to support your point, and you clearly have a comprehension problem and a very poor grasp of the maintenance industry, but don't let that for one moment make you feel any less adequate than you already are. That wouldn't be very good, though it wouldn't be very hard. You should hang onto what you have, and perhaps one day you'll be qualified and experienced enough to properly address the subject.

 

[pipejockey]

Certainly not folks such as yourself; that's for certain.

The absolute arrogance of you, in assuming that everyone wants to fly for a legacy carrier, or that such positions represent the bulk of pilot positions out there! Utter claptrap. Your degree didn't help your comprehension any, as you failed to read what I wrote.

And that GED of yours didn't help your comprehension any, as you clearly failed to read what I wrote. I didn't say EVERYONE wants to work for a Legacy, I said a Legacy is where MOST all of us set our sights when getting involved in this profession.

You want to educate me, do you? My flying experience includes international large four engine turbojet operations through single engine seaplane flying. can you legally repair an aircraft, perform modifications, or sign off an inspection and approve an airframe or powerplant for return to service? I do both. I've done plenty of work under pressure ranging from combat conditions to operations in flight, as a mechanic and inspector. How much of your career have you spent performing high-pressure, in-flight emergency operations in a high risk environment? I've done it a great deal of mine...as a pilot.

TIMAAAAY!!!! Folks, for those of you who have been living in a cave, or have just awakened from a coma, meet Tim Martins!! He has done everything under the sun. If he stares at the sun, it actually extinguishes itself out of fear and self preservation. He is so much more than a mere man, he is immortal.

Your uneducated and uninformed view is a good reason why people like you shouldn't be working on aircraft.

And your anger and contempt at the world, especially pilots, in addition to your mental instability, is why people like you shouldn't be working on aircraft.

You've clearly got a prejudiced, uneducated, rather ignorant and biased view of the maintenance community.

Why? Because I can't understand the accents of half of them? What is the appropriate and politically correct way to explain why I can't understand half of the mechanics as a result of English being a second language for them. Aren't we being a bit paranoid there little guy?

What has that to do with the price of tea in China?

WTF are you babbling about? Calm down and focus there squirt!

A mechanic who desires to be a pilot needs only undertake the same flight training that anyone undertakes. Such training is available at an unending number of sources. For a scant 250 hours of flying, one walks away with a commercial certificate, as a teacher of other pilots, ready to take on the world.

As a teacher of other GA pilots flying light aircraft, and a long way from being competitive for a even a regional airline job these days.

Do you base your statistics upon having instructed half the mechanics around today? Of course you haven't, and to suggest you have would be...a lie. Why not be honest, instead?

Ok you got me! I based my statement on having to instruct half of the mechanics where I work on how to properly MEL an item.

You have an overinflated view of your job, My flying experience includes international large four engine turbojet operations through single engine seaplane flying. can you legally repair an aircraft, perform modifications, or sign off an inspection and approve an airframe or powerplant for return to service? I do both. I've done plenty of work under pressure ranging from combat conditions to operations in flight, as a mechanic and inspector. How much of your career have you spent performing high-pressure, in-flight emergency operations in a high risk environment? I've done it a great deal of mine...as a pilot.

Ummmm, ok, if you say so!:erm:

For starters, put words in your own mouth...not mine. I said nothing about having no concern for anyone's safety.

Really? Then what did you mean by this?

When I work on an airplane, I have no concern whether you ever get in it, much less fly it. I work on it because I'm paid to do so, and I do it to the standards provided by the FAA, the manufacturer, and industry standards, without any concern for you. None at all.

The meaning of the statement "without any concern for you. None at all".
is painfully obvious and the lack of the actual word "safety" is moot. You are merely trying to backtrack and wiggle yourself out of that very dangerous statement you made. The moderators should track you down as you are obviously unstable and have no regard for quite a few people.

 

[avbug]

I said a Legacy is where MOST all of us set our sights when getting involved in this profession.

Ah, you mean most of your ilk. Got it.

Certainly not most of us, meaning pilots. Again, you overvalue your position...but then you don't work for a legacy carrier, do you?

Folks, for those of you who have been living in a cave, or have just awakened from a coma, meet Tim Martins!!

Again, this is a commentary on your own inadequacy, isn't it? You don't have the additional certification, and lack the qualifications, and your inadequacy seems to bother you. This is unfortunate. It shouldn't, you know. More to the point, if you find having some modicum of experience to be extraordinary, it speaks volumes about your own lack of experience, doesn't it?

It does.

Tim Martins is one of your kind. A curtain-climbing legacy wannabe. A regional pilot, dime a dozen, who couldn't tell the truth if he tried. Not even in a national publication. He thought he had the world by the tail, and he thought he knew it all. The world revolved around the airlines, he thought. One or two jobs in his background, and he thought he was experienced.

Perhaps once you've got a few type ratings under your belt and have a little experience, you'll see the world a little differently. That you think a little experience is a fantastic, unbelievable thing doesn't make it so, but is a comical observation of how little you have. You've got a lot to learn.

The meaning of the statement "without any concern for you. None at all".
is painfully obvious and the lack of the actual word "safety" is moot.

Lack of the word "safety" is irrelevant? Hardly. I said nothing about being unconcerned about safety. I'm entirely unconcerned about you.

A poster previously stated that as a mechanic or inspector, my purpose for being is to keep him in his seat. This is an arrogant and very wrong statement. I have no concern for keeping you, or anyone else in your seat. I have no care in the world whether you work another day in your life, ever take off, drink yourself stupid, or die in a gutter somewhere. It's not relevant to my own job description. I do not exist for you. Neither do any of the mechanics at your place of employment exist for you. I don't care how you feel today, what you ate, or if you're able to make your car payments.

As a mechanic, I care about compliance with the technical data for the aircraft on which I work. I care about compliance with regulation. I care about craftsmanship. I don't care about you.

The use of the word "safety" makes a big difference. A single word changes everything, and your attempting to make false statements is in line with your falsification of statistics and your lies thus far. You had no credibility, and have none. You're consistent in your lack of understanding and in your failure to be credible.

Ok you got me!

I know. You lied. Nothing need more be said of you.

 

[pipejockey]

I'm entirely unconcerned about you.
I have no care in the world whether you work another day in your life, ever take off, drink yourself stupid, or die in a gutter somewhere.
I don't care about you.

Please moderators, I urge you to determine this guys identity and report him to the authorities. At least the FAA. This guy has so much anger directed to the pilot group, he is a danger to anyone that gets anywhere near an aircraft he works on or operates. Everyone will be sorry when he busts in with automatic weapons and takes out every pilot he sees.

 

[avbug]

I see you're still inventing things. Careful. You're treading very closely to libel.

If you're going to tell lies, make an effort to see that they're believable. In your case, given your lies thus far, you have a steep road ahead of you.

I've never expressed any anger here, incidentally. You're not quite worthy of contempt, given your lack of credibility.

You've expressed some anger here. Perhaps you ought to look in the mirror. When you're done contaminating the thread, if the remote chance exists that you've anything to contribute, you might make an effort. Thus far, you've failed 100%.

 

[CRJ's suck]

Please moderators, I urge you to determine this guys identity and report him to the authorities. At least the FAA. This guy has so much anger directed to the pilot group, he is a danger to anyone that gets anywhere near an aircraft he works on or operates. Everyone will be sorry when he busts in with automatic weapons and takes out every pilot he sees.

Try reading some of Avbugs 7,500 other posts. He isn't some new, 20 something year old know it all. Is there a chance he is faking all his acquired knowledge? Sure there is, i've never met the guy. Seriously though, who would take the time and effort to write 7,500 posts and be pretty much right on the money in just almost all of them. I highly doubt we need to worry about him anymore than we need to worry about you.

I can say I agree with Avbugs statement of, "As a mechanic, I care about compliance with the technical data for the aircraft on which I work. I care about compliance with regulation. I care about craftsmanship. I don't care about you." When I'm doing my job I don't think about you, the passengers, or anyone else. All I care about is getting it done right. I double check my work for myself and no one else. Some of us do take pride in our jobs and the work we put out. (Disclaimer: I am in no way implying you said "mechanics don't know anything and are dumb and don't care about the their work" or any other variation thereof. It was simply a statement of fact.)

Have a great day everybody.

 

[75 Driver]

The easiest thing I do is fly airplanes.

The hardest is put up with insecure, incompetent managers. ESP: CEO'S and CFO's

The second hardest is keep my maintenance skills, books, calibration and Inspection / AD compliance records up to date on airplanes that are coming in and out the hanger door.

 

[pipejockey]

I highly doubt we need to worry about him anymore than we need to worry about you.

You mean you DON'T worry about me? I would advise you to reconsider.
Pssst....go look out your window.

 

[Lear70]

Knock it off with the innuendo... physical threats will get you a FI vacation, even implied ones.

That goes for the language as well as the slams. You guys are getting out of hand and the personal attacks are against the ToS. Knock if off.

Pipe, I'm not sure if your post telling people to meet "person's name" is the actual name of AvBug. If so, you *KNOW* that disclosing people's identities is one of the biggest ToS violations on this site, and I'm gonna have to give you time off for it. Will wait and see if AvBug contacts me and verifies it.

Both you guys are fun to read from time to time, and I don't want to be sanctioning anyone, but AvBug stays inside the rules while still debating (as aggravating as he can be sometimes). EVERYONE is expected to do that - the ToS are *NOT* suggestions, folks.

/mod

 

[clr4theapch]

After reading the first half of the thread, I had enough... this is an age old debate as to who has the most worth... dispatchers, F/A's, MX, Pilots.. we ALL have our own set of liabilities and skills that make the flying public happy to go from point A to B..

Avbug, your are obviously quite the aviator and have the licenses and abilities that most folks do NOT have. You have obviously many more ways to provide an income for your family and provide insight to Flight info.. congrats...

Everyone has a point of view, an ego and a license in their wallet to wave around, in the end nothing works without the other, nothing flys without the other and to banter back and forth about the value of each is a "nanny nanny boo boo" contest that will produce nothing but hard feelings..

As a MOD I agree with Lear70 on this matter from the FI stand point.. this was a good thread until feeling started to get hurt, ego's start to fire up and emotions end up on the keyboard.. lets keep it respectful, even if you can agree to not agree...

 

[CRJ's suck]

If you don't like what some anonymous person is saying, use the ignore function. I just used for the first time. It works!

Now go have a beer or two and cook up some tenderloins and sweet corn on the grill. It will make your day.

 

[414Flyer]

Avbug is a knowledgable person, with a broad skill set and is a good mechanic, and an experienced pilot too. I can say that I have met him, and unlike a lot of other people on FI , he is the same in person as he is online. If you like or dislike him online, it would probably be the same in person. FI has plenty of people who act all tough or only have a sack because they are behind a computer screen, and would never talk or act that way in person.

Everyone has their good and bad days, and I have seem him on here be exceedingly nice and helpful some days. And maybe some days he might seem like he wants to argue the color of the sky. But more often than not, he will still be correct. And his point about a 4 year degree being inconsequential to the development of a pilot, he is absolutely correct. Hiring concerns for a major airline are a totally tangential argument.

 

[Lear70]

Yeah, I'm gonna have to,,, sort of,,, disagree with you there,,, yeah.

There's a thread going on the Regionals board that points out the value of a college education, specifically an aviation-based degree for pilots. The point? 90% of pilots haven't the FIRST CLUE about swept-wing aerodynamics; something I learned in my 2nd semester of aerodynamics class.

Is it something that could be taught outside of college? Certainly. Is it? No. The Regionals aren't teaching it. The Majors expect you to know it when you get there. None of them teach it then act surprised when a pilot does something really stupid that *SHOULD* be basic swept-wing airmanship 101.

An aviation degree geared towards flying is an EXCELLENT base of knowledge for pilots and makes them better aviators, in most cases, than the pilots who didn't get that degree, unless they were trained by the military, which makes sure their pilots LEARN that information.

Unfortunately, most pilots haven't the personal discipline to go out, buy a copy of Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators and actually get through more than the first or second chapter. Until they do, I'll always preach the value of an aviation degree for aviation professionals. I'm tired of having to teach this crap to almost everyone I fly with...

 

[414Flyer]

Yeah, I'm gonna have to,,, sort of,,, disagree with you there,,, yeah too

I actually would never advocate an aviation degree, and that certainly is not required in order to learn about swept wing aerodynamics. If you are having to conduct remedial training for people you fly with, well maybe your company should consider teaching that if they are hiring people with no swept wing knowledge. Maybe you are getting someone who had some academic class early on at Riddle, but thats a big price to pay in order to have a chance to take that class.

I have heard the opposite idea, that people that come through Riddle and UND, are often actually much more limited in experience than someone who does it part 61, and I know quite a few who went that route, and who would tell anyone else not to go that way. And they are highly in debt, have a degree that is fairly useless, and have very little actual PIC experience doing anything outside their narrow structured college program.

But then again I have flown with someone who told me how important being on the UND Flight team was to making him a real pilot

 

[Lear70]

I actually would never advocate an aviation degree, and that certainly is not required in order to learn about swept wing aerodynamics. If you are having to conduct remedial training for people you fly with, well maybe your company should consider teaching that if they are hiring people with no swept wing knowledge.

You're talking about EVERY SINGLE REGIONAL AND MAJOR AIRLINE here, as well as every Fractional. NO ONE teaches it; it's one of the things we learned after FLG3701. Airlines have either determined that the extra money and time it takes to teach it isn't worth it from a cost/benefit/risk analysis, or they just don't care.

They may show brief excerpts from the old AA training videos from the early 90's on crossover angle of attack, etc, but no one starts with the basics and works up to a complete knowledge base. It results in pilots who are button pushers, automation-dependent, and have memorized responses to certain critical events (stalls, overspeeds) and understand their basics but that's the limit to their knowledge.

It results in a substandard pilot. It's just that simple.

 

[UndauntedFlyer]

Aircraft mechanics are the most under-appreciated FAA certificate holders. They should be paid the most for their skill and responsibility but are usually paid the least. This is because the pilot is in the position to give the work orders. After a flight it is the pilot who writes up the maintenance discrepancies in the log. That makes him the boss since he/she gives the orders, so to speak. It isn't fair but that's just the way things work out.

In reality, I agree with Avbug completely about mechanics and their training, work and responsibilities. In time as mechanics become more scarce their pay will increase, but even then since pilots are always in the position of giving the orders, pilots will maintain a higher position in terms of the pecking order. And it is the pecking order that usually determines pay.

That's not fair I know, but for some reason I expect this will not change.

It's funny but in the colleges that have a pilot program and an A&P mechanic program, with each being a 4-year degree program, the pilots always have an attitude that they are better or smarter. Why, I don't know, especially when the curriculum for the mechanic is much harder than the curriculum to be a pilot? The truth is that anyone, including your grandmother, can learn to become a pilot and pass the tests, but that is not the case for A&P school and the practical test. The truth is that in the FAA approved pilot programs it's easy compared to the FAA approved mechanic programs.

So why would anyone become a mechanic compared to being a pilot when it is the pilot who gets all the glory, the girls and the pay? Maybe because it is the mechanic who just loves his/her work and just doesn't like flying that much. People always hope to do what they like in life. Flying or fixing things. That's their choice and they take what they get with the job.

That was EASY! Hit the EASY button.