Again, nothing but name calling from the 9E guys. What's up with this?
I should ask you the same thing. The Pinnacle's ex-MEC, current MEC, and members of the SLI team are being called out by name from XJ guys here. What's up with this?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Again, nothing but name calling from the 9E guys. What's up with this?
Very pertinent contribution to the subject being discussed. The gentlemen was speaking poorly of individuals, that he does not know, that I do know. He is totally incorrect in his assumptions of both.
I summarized my impression of his attitude and actions into a well recognized descriptive term. Your disappointment with the term I chose does not change its validity or appropriateness to the situation.
I should ask you the same thing. The Pinnacle's ex-MEC, current MEC, and members of the SLI team are being called out by name from XJ guys here. What's up with this?
Mesaba and Colgan got there stuff in almost immediately, yet it is taking Pinnacle 3 or 4 days to do the same work.
Don't say anything about Mesaba MEC disputing this because there is no question that isn't the case THIS week.
How can 9E pilots have any respect for themselves when their MEC does a 9 month stab-in-the-back to XJ/9L by trying to staple them? This goes against everything fair and the spirit of the ALPA Merger policy upto this point. It's really pathetic and I don't care how long it takes anymore, I don't want to work with 9E pilots anyway. Much less fly a POS 200.
If having a decision 24 hours faster was such a big deal maybe they should have rethought that hair brained stunt last week.
This is rich coming from the pilot group that picketed during the last days of contract negotiations threatening to derail the process, then massacring the Colgan and Mesaba pilot groups for not joining them....
I also want to address what was said earlier on this thread.....how do they know Bloch "shot down" the dispute on the DOH for 9E? Won't that be decided in the final award?
This is rich coming from the pilot group that picketed during the last days of contract negotiations threatening to derail the process, then massacring the Colgan and Mesaba pilot groups for not joining them....
Oh yeah...that was that event where the Colgan and Mesaba MECs became the first pilot groups in the history of ALPA to ever solicit a request of no support for another pilot group. Classy stuff.
I'm sick and tired of hearing about Pinnacle's final standpoint submitted as a staple job. Why won't anyone talk about 9E's negotiating standpoints? Our union seriously needs to release them. The last email said something along the lines that they are thinking about releasing them. They should! Shut the trapholes of some of these people here who have no clue as to what 9E proposed in the negotiations phase. Let me give you a hint. With a straight-up DOH proposal, there is no room for negotiations. It's either straight DOH or it's not. Same thing with relative. It's either straight relative or it's not. NEITHER side budged from their viewpoint. Those initial viewpoints continued in negotiations, and then were submitted as final views. Where's the negotiations?!
9E was the one group that tried to submit different proposals, but they were either turned down or just outright ignored.
COLGAN PEOPLE:
Your union was initially submitted a proposal about taking 9E guys and 9L guys up to the date of Colgan purchase (Jan 2007), everyone on property that day and before, get relative. Then, after the purchase date in Jan 2007, everyone on property on both sides get DOH. This proposal WOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN A STAPLE JOB FOR COLGAN! I say again, relative among 9E/9L until the purchase date of Jan 2007, then DOH afterwards. The Colgan committee chairman did not even acknowledge this viewpoint. From the get-go, it seems he wanted it to be in the arbitrators hands.
I better not hear any Colgan guy complain about Pinnacle's final method. Pinnacles final method came after the other two groups outright ignored them and were not willing to negotiate to some middle ground. Pinnacle even tried different variations for stat/cat method, but no one negotiated.
So if you want to be ticked off at Pinnacle's final viewpoints, blame the 9L and XJ committee for refusing to negotiate anything else other then their initial AND final viewpoints. They never budged.
I agree, it would be nice to hear all the facts. I too am tired of all the bickering and back biting. I want this SLI done and singular union representation. Cheers
Again, it could be said that the Pinnacle MEC didn't support everyone else, but you just want to keep throwing stones
I'm not the one who brought the issue up. The stone was thrown by JAMIESTRAT. You seem to think that PCL pilots should just roll over while we get bombarded with slanderous rumors and outright lies.