Minimaniac
Benevolent Dictator
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2005
- Posts
- 455
Let me reply to your accusations with the following:
Frontier pilots will not be displaced out of their seats when the seniority list is combined, fences or no fences. At RAH, we do not have system bids for seats on a regular basis, but rather we bid upon vacancies as they arise. So long as a Frontier pilot chooses to stay in his or her seat, he/she will be able to remain in that seat. Now, if for some reason the number of Airbus airframes decreases, then those affected pilots will be displaced based on seniority. That is the way we do things at Republic. Even if something as absurd as a staple occurs and Frontier pilots end up at the bottom of the RAH list, the most senior RAH captain will not be able to knock an Airbus captain out of their seat. No Frontier pilot will be forced to take a step back. If a Frontier FO elects to upgrade to an E-jet CA slot when it comes available, that is his choice, and not something to blame the Republic pilot group for. The wages are posted, and he can make his own informed decision.
Consequently, the idea of Bedford saying that he will put junior guys in the Airbus if they take reduced airbus wages does not apply. As a single seniority list, one cannot leapfrog like that. And, as stated above, a junior RAH pilot will not be able to displace a Frontier pilot out of their seat. Bedford does not want to incur any extra training expense by having everyone play musical chairs. Take it from the pilots who work at RAH, and know how Bedford operates his company from an internal standpoint.
We need a new payscale that reflects the nature of our airline. That is why we are in section 6 negotiations. That is why we have been negotiating for years before this double whammy came our way. We are working for better wages by every legal means available. If we were happy with our wages and work rules, we would have merely signed an extension to our contract. But that hasn't happened, has it?
Frontier pilots will not be displaced out of their seats when the seniority list is combined, fences or no fences. At RAH, we do not have system bids for seats on a regular basis, but rather we bid upon vacancies as they arise. So long as a Frontier pilot chooses to stay in his or her seat, he/she will be able to remain in that seat. Now, if for some reason the number of Airbus airframes decreases, then those affected pilots will be displaced based on seniority. That is the way we do things at Republic. Even if something as absurd as a staple occurs and Frontier pilots end up at the bottom of the RAH list, the most senior RAH captain will not be able to knock an Airbus captain out of their seat. No Frontier pilot will be forced to take a step back. If a Frontier FO elects to upgrade to an E-jet CA slot when it comes available, that is his choice, and not something to blame the Republic pilot group for. The wages are posted, and he can make his own informed decision.
Consequently, the idea of Bedford saying that he will put junior guys in the Airbus if they take reduced airbus wages does not apply. As a single seniority list, one cannot leapfrog like that. And, as stated above, a junior RAH pilot will not be able to displace a Frontier pilot out of their seat. Bedford does not want to incur any extra training expense by having everyone play musical chairs. Take it from the pilots who work at RAH, and know how Bedford operates his company from an internal standpoint.
We need a new payscale that reflects the nature of our airline. That is why we are in section 6 negotiations. That is why we have been negotiating for years before this double whammy came our way. We are working for better wages by every legal means available. If we were happy with our wages and work rules, we would have merely signed an extension to our contract. But that hasn't happened, has it?