As an Erj guy, myself and most other pilots I know are not drawing a line in the sand saying absolutely no pbs ever! The line is being drawn about taking more concessions in pay or quality of life. While pbs may allow more people to get trips that they want, pbs is a staffing tool. The reason management wants pbs is because it saves them money. The cost savings comes through "efficient use of pilots." Pbs reduces the number of days you have off during a week of vacation or bidding conflicts between bid periods. The net result is less days off averaged over the entire pilot group. Less days off means they don't have to hire as many pilots that equals cost savings. I already work way too many days per month/year. If pbs (ASA's or otherwise) shows up on a TA with no improvements, it will be a no vote from me. I'm not exactly sure what it would take to get me to vote yes for pbs. It's going to have to be something to offset my pending lack of days off. Something like undeniable personal drops, an increased number of days off around a week of vacation. An increase in the minimum number of days off per month, a significant increase in the duty period minimum. Then again, if you implemented provisions for pilots to get more days off the cost savings for pbs might drop or be eliminated entirely and why would management sign off on it? I think that if you took a survey of all the Erj guys, something similar to my post would be the most prevalent response.