Joe - For a long time I've been restrained and polite about it, but I'm tired of your innuendo and now when you flat out lie, I'm calling you on it.
We'll kick this around off the board since it is unrelated to the thread, but for the record:
- I am not a supporter of the RJDC, have not been since hearing about the direction settlement was going.
- I objected to the hiring of the RJDC's attorney, objected to the complaint, did not wish to be a class representative, or litigant and was excluded from attorney client (and I assume other internal) distribution lists since I could be deposed and would have to answer and supply any communications received. (now you want to reconsider the lie you told?)
- I received no notice of the settlement, no notice as a class member and certainly did not receive any money. If what you wrote is the truth, the RJDC failed to properly provide notice and distribution (see where this is going?)
- I supported the RJDC when I believed it was an effort to fix scope and obtain one list across our brand's flying. My goal was to return Delta flying to Delta pilots.
- I believed (and argued on this board) that the monetary claim was simply an enforcement mechanism and that the RJDC was a reform minded movement. I was embarrassed by the $600,000.00.
- The RJDC has become an advocate for its own version of predatory scope, using its settlement to attempt sniper shots at other pilots working agreements with the stated goal of scope by type certificates which would result in the outsourcing of the E190 sized jets, then a matrix to continue that path to 737 sized aircraft.
You want to start discussing
you now? Gloves are coming off.
