Just thinking
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2005
- Posts
- 348
"if it was so awesome, why were so few built? If it was the airplane that made FL into what it was, why did they stop buying 'em and instead opt for...wait for it...737s!"........
Boeing actively marketed the 717 to a number of large airlines, including Lufthansa and Northwest (who already operated a large fleet of DC-9 aircraft). Boeing also studied a stretched, higher-capacity version of the 717, to have been called 717-300, but decided against proceeding with the new model, fearing that it would encroach on the company's 737-700 model. Production of the original 717 continued. Boeing continued to believe that the 100-passenger market would be lucrative enough to support both the 717 and the 737-600, the smallest of the Next-Generation 737 series. While the aircraft were similar in overall size, the 737-600 was better suited to long-distance routes, while the lighter 717 was more efficient on shorter, regional routes.
The 717 is a great aircraft. Delta will be very happy with the proper placement in its route structure.
I would venture to bet that many SWA stations that have been slashed in service frequency would have been more than happy to have 717's operating. Many millions of dollars have been spent to build up these routes only to have them cut to the bone.
Flattish? Shrink to profitability? 15% ROIC?
Net gain for aircraft deliveries will be a (-20) aircraft for the year.
Boeing actively marketed the 717 to a number of large airlines, including Lufthansa and Northwest (who already operated a large fleet of DC-9 aircraft). Boeing also studied a stretched, higher-capacity version of the 717, to have been called 717-300, but decided against proceeding with the new model, fearing that it would encroach on the company's 737-700 model. Production of the original 717 continued. Boeing continued to believe that the 100-passenger market would be lucrative enough to support both the 717 and the 737-600, the smallest of the Next-Generation 737 series. While the aircraft were similar in overall size, the 737-600 was better suited to long-distance routes, while the lighter 717 was more efficient on shorter, regional routes.
The 717 is a great aircraft. Delta will be very happy with the proper placement in its route structure.
I would venture to bet that many SWA stations that have been slashed in service frequency would have been more than happy to have 717's operating. Many millions of dollars have been spent to build up these routes only to have them cut to the bone.
Flattish? Shrink to profitability? 15% ROIC?
Net gain for aircraft deliveries will be a (-20) aircraft for the year.