Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is no reordering of the lists. A position on the new seniority list is not determined by what a pilot chooses to fly, but rather what his seniority is capable of holding if everyone bid what their seniority can hold.
Next question: If the 88's and -9's are the same "category" for integration purposes, shouldn't the most junior DAL 88-holding pilot be down at the bottom with the -9 guys? Still looks like a staple for the bottom 10%. I don't see anything relative about it.
It that's the case, it makes you wonder why DALPA took such an extreme preposterous position.
Schwanker
So, why organize it based on aircraft category at all? Why not just use the seniority list as a whole?
Next question: If the 88's and -9's are the same "category" for integration purposes, shouldn't the most junior DAL 88-holding pilot be down at the bottom with the -9 guys? Still looks like a staple for the bottom 10%. I don't see anything relative about it.
Still optimistic for a middle ground . . . .
We will accomplish nothing, but Relative by equipment is not extreme. It is a moderate position. We could have gone off in left field and asked for a staple. It is apparent that DALPA is trying to be realistic in its goals.