Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PHXFLYR said:But why we should comply with that portion of the Transition Agreement while the AAA MEC seems to cherry pick only the parts that work best for them while ignoring the rest is beyond me...
PHXFLYR![]()
Green said:I think it's high time we stop being so spineless and demand a staple ala TWA/American. Very similar situation. TWA had no career expectations and AAA had no career expectations. I bet one could argue TWA was in better shape financially than AAA.
PHXFLYR said:AMEN!! Regardless of whose money was used,they seem to forget that they were purchased out of bankruptcy court.....
PHXFLYR
Doug Parker said:.
0 for 2
Time to Play hardball or the one that really counts will make it 0 for 3
.
ERJFO said:Question...
What happenes with the "growth" AWA does end up getting. I understand they will upgrade guys and more seats will be created but where will the new people come from? AAA or off the street?
Green said:We are not, nor will we get growth at AWA. All new flying will be put on the AAA certificate as that will be the surviving operating certificate. We have offered a few openings to furloughed AAA pilots (vegas i believe) but that is due to attrition not growth.
ALGFLYR said:True, but AWA didn't buy us. We were bought as was AWA. So someone bought BOTH of us and combined us because we BOTH had value in this merger. If AAA had no value, why do it? Why not just take all the money and invest it in AWA alone?
erjdude said:Actually that is not true. The surviving holding company is AWA. It assumed the name US AIRWAYS after the PURCHASE. Other companies such GE cap. Airbus and others were INVESTERS.
Bubba Dog said:It's not about establishing who is king of the hill,but that we all live like Kings on a hill with the best contract in the business.
Bubba Dog said:AWA is listed as a subsidiary of USAirways Group in the most recent SEC filing.
But the bigger question is, what does it matter? In another year this will all be a mute point.
I guess all pilots have to establish some sort of a pecking order. It's not about establishing who is king of the hill,but that we all live like Kings on a hill with the best contract in the business.
erjdude said:Just a point of fact Bubba Dog but research the previous name for USAirways Group and you will see it was America West Airlines Holdings inc. The previous company using that name ceased to exist after the merger.
Does this this matter to you and i and how the seniority list is integrated? No, porbably you and I both will not be happy with the outcome. Such is our industry. The one fact is that although we currently work for seperate companies under the same holding company, in a year we wont. And in that time I hope we can stop fighting eachother and find the strengh to get a good combined contract and have some fun flying together.
ALGFLYR said:See reply to PHXFLYR above...
Hpilot said:Nice to see you've been talking to yourself while I've been gone. As far as 50/50, that's right fair and equitable to you is a stable to the bottom. Look at Section II.B.3 & 4. One more case of ignoring the agreement. Oh, never mind reading it. You're going to ignore it anyways.
Hpilot said:“The current and announced flying, as of the effective date of this agreement, between points west of the Mississippi River and the State of Hawaii will be flown by America West pilots.”
The Hawaii flying wouldn't have made it to arbitration if it wasn't based on something.
johnnyb said:Quoting the Arbitrator from page 14 mid paragraph
" ... the AWA pilot group overreaches when it demands a one-half share .."
Sounds like you pushed it as hard as you could.