Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Compass to Seperate from DAL MEC

  • Thread starter Thread starter IFLYIMC
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 31

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Keep in mind that this isn't final until the governing bodies at the national level approve it. It's entirely possible that the Executive Council will look at the split vote and decide that this isn't a good idea.

Where does the CPZ coordinator stand on this issue?
 
How do you figure the flow at XJ "pales" in comparison to the flow at CP? I'd much rather have protections for a flowback when times are bad and have them metered. If it means only haveing a trickle up (9) then so be it. The flow rate that CP currently has of 25 or whatever is non sustainable and would be completely devastating if there were to be a flowback.

Fine... give up your flow. More slots for the XJ guys when things start turning around. I hope that attitude is a minority attitude! Ask the 12 XJ guys that got to flow how they like it? If it isn't hurting you, why get rid of it?

As for a merger between Compass and Mesaba... well... that would be rather entertaining.

Having your own MEC will finally allow you proper representation. Yea, 'cause the NW/DL pilots were really looking out for your best interests... especially giving you a non voting "representative" position. Now you'll have your own MEC and finally be just like the rest of the DCI grunts. And having the attitude that you couldn't represent yourselves because there is nobody good enough is defeatest and really sad. Take care of your own problems like the rest of us! There's got to be at least 10 guys there willing to stand up for your group right?
 
Last edited:
so who is gonna guess on how the lists will be intergrated when it comes time to deal with that, will we have former 175 captains as sabb captains, or 175 fos as 340 fos? 9 fos who will be 175 captains?
 
so who is gonna guess on how the lists will be intergrated when it comes time to deal with that, will we have former 175 captains as sabb captains, or 175 fos as 340 fos? 9 fos who will be 175 captains?

That seems to be getting a little ahead of things, doesn't it?
 
not if "its a done deal" according to someones brothers sisters cousins uncle's step son who blew a former LCA at compass while in highschool said so!
 
Double edged sword

Ending the flow would, in the long run, be detrimental to the interests of the CPZ guys if, and only if, recall rights attach even if you get a job elsewhere and would still be eligible for return to your previous status. In the short term, I am of the opinion that eventually DAL will have to furlough some bodies and 350 bodies is a relatively small number, but enough to displace EVERY pilot at Compass.

Retirements will resume before the economy, and more importantly, the consumer regain the confidence to return the industry to good times. The question is whether DAL can eat the costs of carrying extra people until late 2013.

Let's not forget the possibility that this industry, and tangentially, this JOB (you will notice I will never use the word career in connection with piloting ever again) simply will never be the same. The public has determined that air travel is no different than any other utility and should always be affordable.

The public will always tell you that you should be well paid, but backpedal like a mutherfocker when you add the caveat that it would double airfares.

REALITY CHECK:::!!!!! Those so inclined, please insert head in sand at this time.

Flying is the best job in the world in my opinion. If you want to undertake the challenge for the love of it, do so. Just be damn sure you have suitable backup income/options and never expect to make great money for the rest of your career.

runnin' like a mofo.
 
Keep in mind that this isn't final until the governing bodies at the national level approve it. It's entirely possible that the Executive Council will look at the split vote and decide that this isn't a good idea.

Where does the CPZ coordinator stand on this issue?

The CPZ coordinator is a strong advocate for remaining within DAL MEC, he's giving a presentation to the Ex. Council at the request of the MEC to state his view point.
 
Keep in mind that this isn't final until the governing bodies at the national level approve it. It's entirely possible that the Executive Council will look at the split vote and decide that this isn't a good idea.

Where does the CPZ coordinator stand on this issue?
Prater will be feeding his face with a jelly donut and coffee, trying to figure out how to get more money for the MECS to eat. This is small stuff compared to the MECS food bills
 
Keep in mind that this isn't final until the governing bodies at the national level approve it. It's entirely possible that the Executive Council will look at the split vote and decide that this isn't a good idea.

Where does the CPZ coordinator stand on this issue?

Its not up to the Council to decide if this is a good idea. The only thing the EC will do is look at the feasibility/reasonability of the request. Even with the split vote, the resolution more than meets these benchmarks.
 
Its not up to the Council to decide if this is a good idea. The only thing the EC will do is look at the feasibility/reasonability of the request. Even with the split vote, the resolution more than meets these benchmarks.

The Bylaws aren't exactly clear on this, as far as I can tell. However, I would say that "feasibility" is in question, as the Association is having financial problems. Creating a new MEC for no reasonable purpose that will surely suck up OCF money and not be able to support itself, while meanwhile the DAL MEC has millions of dollars sitting in their SMRA doing nothing but buying extravagant furniture to inflate the Chairman's ego, make this a highly unreasonable request, in my opinion.
 
The Bylaws aren't exactly clear on this, as far as I can tell. However, I would say that "feasibility" is in question, as the Association is having financial problems. Creating a new MEC for no reasonable purpose that will surely suck up OCF money and not be able to support itself, while meanwhile the DAL MEC has millions of dollars sitting in their SMRA doing nothing but buying extravagant furniture to inflate the Chairman's ego, make this a highly unreasonable request, in my opinion.

By your reasoning though, the Council should be pushing all mainline MECs to absorb their regional counterparts MECs or to at least donate their excess revenue to the less fortunate. Certainly, that isn't about to happen at any time in the foreseeable future.

All the DAL MEC is asking is to undo the horrible situation that the NWA MEC created. The current situation is no different than the governmental arrangement that led to the Revolutionary War. It was a stupid idea in the first place and it needs to end before it does erupt into war.
 
By your reasoning though, the Council should be pushing all mainline MECs to absorb their regional counterparts MECs

Compass is a slightly different creature than most regionals. There never was an MEC to be "absorbed" in the case of Compass, because it was created by the action of the NWA MEC when they took concessions and created Compass. The entire CPZ contract was negotiated by NWA MEC reps. The flowup/down structure is unique. Etc...

or to at least donate their excess revenue to the less fortunate.

I don't know if I'd put it that way, but I have suggested eliminating the SMRA refund policy and capping SMRA balances at $5 million, sweeping the overage into the A&S, OCF, or MCF. A handful of MECs sit on millions upon millions of dollars, and meanwhile, the rest of the Association struggles and the Unit 1 staff is told to suck it up and take concessions. This is fair? I think not.

Certainly, that isn't about to happen at any time in the foreseeable future.

I'm not sure exactly what will happen, but there will have to be changes. Expenses can only surpass revenue for so long before something gives.

All the DAL MEC is asking is to undo the horrible situation that the NWA MEC created. The current situation is no different than the governmental arrangement that led to the Revolutionary War. It was a stupid idea in the first place and it needs to end before it does erupt into war.

Apparently the CPZ coordinator disagrees with your assessment. Should we not listen to the representative of the CPZ pilots as to what is in their best interests? This reeks of nothing more than some reps' disdain for "little airplane" drivers.

I really find it interesting that the 13/12 vote fell entirely along North/South lines. The South (Delta) reps all voted FOR, with the North (NWA) reps all voting AGAINST. Big shocker. The pilots that have consistently led the way in giving away scope and looking down their noses at RJ pilots are trying to shove the CPZ pilots aside, while the pilots that have historically had some of the best scope are trying to preserve a working relationship that has an intact flow-through program. At least it gives me a shred of hope that the 12 that voted AGAINST will also vote against a certain someone becoming the next ALPA President.
 
All the DAL MEC is asking is to undo the horrible situation that the NWA MEC created. The current situation is no different than the governmental arrangement that led to the Revolutionary War. It was a stupid idea in the first place and it needs to end before it does erupt into war.

Tell me more, what part of it is stupid?

Is it the part where the mainline MEC has an active hand in the operation and control of it's wholly-owned regional carriers? To me, that sounds right up ALPA's "Taking it Back" mantra.

Is it the part where divesting compass only passed by one vote along pre-merger lines? It seems the NWA guys understand the value of keeping the children close.

Or is it that you are a Mesaba pilot and are just afraid to see something different happening, and think you may somehow get screwed on the deal? The biggest complaint from the other regionals that I hear is the well educated argument of, "It's not Fair!".
 
so would DOH be a fair way to integrate the seniority lists with some sort of fence on the crj's and erj's for 5 years or something?
 
Hi!

Doesn't AA Eagle fly feed for DAL? And Horizon was flying feed for Frontier.

cliff
NBO
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom