I have a dumb question. Why would the flow be in jeopardy with regard to new representation?
One has nothing to do with the other.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have a dumb question. Why would the flow be in jeopardy with regard to new representation?
But the flow up/dn was negotiated much earlier and is the reason Compass exists in the first place. NWA LOAs 2006-10 and 2006-14 clearly outline the flow up and down and are dated July 31, 2006.
So let me get this straight- you are owned by DAL INC., and you think that another airline is going to hire you for flying a regional lift contract? Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that like putting money directly into the hands of the competitor, for any other airline looking to do this???? Why not save the trouble and have United, USAirways, American, or any of the others just write Delta a check to expedite the bleeding- it would be easier that way and burn less fuel in the process...............
So let me get this straight- you are owned by DAL INC., and you think that another airline is going to hire you for flying a regional lift contract? Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that like putting money directly into the hands of the competitor, for any other airline looking to do this????
Whats the difference between RAH, Mesa and Colgan etc....that fly for more than one airline.
LOA 2006-10 might have been negotiated in 2006, but we had not seen anything in writing until July of 2007. Yes we were given a brief update on contract negotiations up to July of 2007 but we did not see details until it was signed and printed. As for your comment about the flow, Compass was not created based on flow it was created base on providing jobs to the NWA furloughed pilots.
Whats the difference between RAH, Mesa and Colgan etc....that fly for more than one airline.
It is a bad idea for both. I does make sense on the representational side of the issue., the same mec representing mainline and regional who have competing interests. However, I think that this opens the door and paves the way for CPS to get spun off. You are correct that the DAL pilot contract provides for the flow, however should cps be spun off that could easily be amended by LOA...especially given the track record on scope that the current MEC has under Moak. This first step makes the other steps easier and more likely. If you are not in favor of the flow and are at Cps currently then you have the option of "opting" out and choosing the Cps career path, keeping your seniority/seat and your job in the event of a flow down. I believe that this option is available to 10% of the Cps list, what's wrong with letting the other 90% flow up when thier time comes? NOTHING.
This is yet another step into merging Compass with Mesaba...those who have been following the small details see how these are all adding up. Before you respond with a "no Way" please do some research and your homework...Soon the Compass pilots will be represented by the Mesaba Mec! First under the cover as a trasitional MEC, then...
LOA 2006-10 might have been negotiated in 2006, but we had not seen anything in writing until July of 2007. Yes we were given a brief update on contract negotiations up to July of 2007 but we did not see details until it was signed and printed. As for your comment about the flow, Compass was not created based on flow it was created base on providing jobs to the NWA furloughed pilots.