777forever
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2007
- Posts
- 1,535
I hope not.
You hope not? You must enjoy that 145. The CRJ200 is a complete piece. Replacing.g them all 1for one with a 700 would be great.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hope not.
You hope not? You must enjoy that 145. The CRJ200 is a complete piece. Replacing.g them all 1for one with a 700 would be great.
What????? You must be smokin some funny stuff there friend....
Growth.....now that's something we ain't got!!!!!!!
You hope not? You must enjoy that 145. The CRJ200 is a complete piece. Replacing.g them all 1for one with a 700 would be great.
This makes sense, except that SkyWest and United have a non-compete clause out of LAX which would effect (I would guess SFO and SEA). Not familiar with the details of this clause, or if it has been in fact re-negotiated (that's why ASA (followed by XJT) had a base in LAX, OO couldn't). It is plausible and I've heard that ASA has purchased all the rest of Horizon's 700's.
Pay me enough and I'll fly a C152. I rather see the 700s go to mainline. But thats just me. Anyway, I get paid just as much in my 145 as you do in the 700.
If you're goal is being a regional airline pilot your entire career, flying for regional wages, on a regional CBA, watching your job get recycled every couple years, have at it and want the smaller aircraft to be replaced by something that should be at mainline.
Like Nevets said, I'd fly a kite all day as long I'm on a mainline seniority list getting paid mainline wages while doing it.
The 700 is a complete lost cause at mainline folks. NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN. Get over it. The sooner pilots get realistic and start thinking analytically the better off this career will be. Look what Lee Moak has done over at Delta.
If mainline wants to replace 50s with 70s one for one I have no problem with that. The flying has already been outsourced. Let the people maximize their revenue and make sure the mainline pilots get a cut of the increased revenue.
The 700 is a complete lost cause at mainline folks. NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN. Get over it. The sooner pilots get realistic and start thinking analytically the better off this career will be. Look what Lee Moak has done over at Delta.
If mainline wants to replace 50s with 70s one for one I have no problem with that. The flying has already been outsourced. Let the people maximize their revenue and make sure the mainline pilots get a cut of the increased revenue.
If you're goal is being a regional airline pilot your entire career, flying for regional wages, on a regional CBA, watching your job get recycled every couple years, have at it and want the smaller aircraft to be replaced by something that should be at mainline.
Like Nevets said, I'd fly a kite all day as long I'm on a mainline seniority list getting paid mainline wages while doing it.
You want analytical ok. For every (3) 200 you replace with 700/900s you really do away with the need for one more 200. That’s around 6 pilot jobs that could have been created but instead those people will be on the streets.
Isn’t it ironic that your screen name is 777forever when everything that you propose is for stagnation. It’s also ironic how many people like you change your opinion once they finally do get a job at the majors. Do you really think that you will say, “they are just thinking analytically”, if you were junior at the majors and they gave us scope for the C-Series. Then you, just like many thousand before would be on the street begging for your CRJ200 FO spot back.
I propose that 777forever should have to change his name to CRJ200FOforever. Lets put it to a vote… All in favor say aye.
You want analytical ok. For every (3) 200 you replace with 700/900s you really do away with the need for one more 200. That’s around 6 pilot jobs that could have been created but instead those people will be on the streets.
Isn’t it ironic that your screen name is 777forever when everything that you propose is for stagnation. It’s also ironic how many people like you change your opinion once they finally do get a job at the majors. Do you really think that you will say, “they are just thinking analytically”, if you were junior at the majors and they gave us scope for the C-Series. Then you, just like many thousand before would be on the street begging for your CRJ200 FO spot back.
I propose that 777forever should have to change his name to CRJ200FOforever. Lets put it to a vote… All in favor say aye.
Man I can't stand stupidity. Where in the hell did you get replacing 3 200s with 700/900 equals one less 200 needed? I clearly stated on a one for one basis. If XJT has 200 E145s outsourced by CAL that is 200 planes worth of flying that is gone and not coming back. Let management use whatever size(51-76) regional aircraft they want on those 200 planes and let mainline pilots take a pay increase for increasing regional revenue. Before you know it profits will be up and the widebody orders will start rolling in.
But if you guys want to keep being short sighted and fighting over mainline pilots flying to College Station and not focusing on increasing routes to Dubai, Shanghai and other places where the yield is high enough to pay the pilot very well, so be it.
Is Lee Monk truly the only one around here that has some sense?
Why can't you have all this branded flying done by pilots on the mainline seniority list with current work rules and compensation that exist at the regionals?
You want analytical ok. For every (3) 200 you replace with 700/900s you really do away with the need for one more 200. That’s around 6 pilot jobs that could have been created but instead those people will be on the streets.
Isn’t it ironic that your screen name is 777forever when everything that you propose is for stagnation. It’s also ironic how many people like you change your opinion once they finally do get a job at the majors. Do you really think that you will say, “they are just thinking analytically”, if you were junior at the majors and they gave us scope for the C-Series. Then you, just like many thousand before would be on the street begging for your CRJ200 FO spot back.
I propose that 777forever should have to change his name to CRJ200FOforever. Lets put it to a vote… All in favor say aye.
Why can't you have all this branded flying done by pilots on the mainline seniority list with current work rules and compensation that exist at the regionals?
Man I can't stand stupidity. Where in the hell did you get replacing 3 200s with 700/900 equals one less 200 needed? I clearly stated on a one for one basis. If XJT has 200 E145s outsourced by CAL that is 200 planes worth of flying that is gone and not coming back. Let management use whatever size(51-76) regional aircraft they want on those 200 planes and let mainline pilots take a pay increase for increasing regional revenue. Before you know it profits will be up and the widebody orders will start rolling in.
But if you guys want to keep being short sighted and fighting over mainline pilots flying to College Station and not focusing on increasing routes to Dubai, Shanghai and other places where the yield is high enough to pay the pilot very well, so be it.
Is Lee Monk truly the only one around here that has some sense?
Ask the UAL guys how well it worked allowing RJ's in based on management's promise of more 777's back in the late 90's.
1st off, UAL has more 777s and 747s than any other Legacy.2nd, United got an absolutely wonderful pilot contract shortly after that. Than a little thing called 9-11 happened iI would think(sarcasm) hurt United's ability to order widebody aircraft.
So that makes your argument right? I'm terribly sorry that the vast majority of line pilots continue to find your 'Lee Moak Theory' to be completely bunk. If management wants to fly longhauls they will buy the airplanes. Bending over on scope will not quicken that process...
REALISTIC PROPOSAL:
UP THE SEAT SCOPE TO 76 BUT FREEZE CURRENT NUMBER OF REGIONAL AIRCRAFT. ALLOW A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF EXTRA RJ TO BE ADDED PER EACH NEW WIDEBODY THAT IS DELIVERED.
EXTRA PAY INCREASE FOR ADDITIONAL REVENUE FROM UPPING SCOPE CLAUSE.
Ok throw my arguement out the window. Let's get out of lala land utopia where we are debating unrealistic stuff like mainline taking all the flying. Fact is:
THE 700/900, E170, AND E175 WILL NEVER GO TO MAINLINE. THIS IS A RELIGIOUS ISSUE. MANAGEMENT WILL LET YOU STRIKE TO YOUR HEARTS CONTENT AND NOT BUDGE!
IF YOU STILL WON'T ACCEPT REALITY WHEN THE ARBITRAITOR LAUGHS AT THE PILOTS AND RULES IN FAVOR OF UAL/CAL THAT SHOULD BE A WAKE-UP CALL!
ALL OF YOUR LEGACY COMPETITORS HAVE A HIGHER SEAT SCOPE CLAUSE. YOUR COMPETITORS IN EUROPE HAVE E190s AND F100s OUTSOURCED. THE FIGHT TO RECLAIM LOST SCOPE IS FRUITLESS.
REALISTIC PROPOSAL:
UP THE SEAT SCOPE TO 76 BUT FREEZE CURRENT NUMBER OF REGIONAL AIRCRAFT. ALLOW A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF EXTRA RJ TO BE ADDED PER EACH NEW WIDEBODY THAT IS DELIVERED.
EXTRA PAY INCREASE FOR ADDITIONAL REVENUE FROM UPPING SCOPE CLAUSE.
CRJFOFOREVER is a more appropriate screen name for you. Maybe it's not too late to change it. It's amazing you know so much after so little time in the industry.
If even you think that a reversal of scope would not happen, then why on earth would you propose to loosen scope even more?
That's what you've written here -- in obnoxious capital letters, no less. Like you're yelling at everyone on here, despite your overall inexperience in this industry.
Loosening scope? I'm not suggesting adding the cseries or any other large RJ. I'm suggesting that UAL/CAL pilots will have to allow management to match their competitor's regional aircraft sizes. What I'm proposing includes only swaps of smaller 50 seaters for larger ones. There is no net gain of aircraft.
There's no need for huge about of experience here. It's call understanding contract negotiations, being able to analyze, and reason. A little common sense helps too. Talk to any one with contract neg experience and ask there opinion. Give Lee Mook a ring or toss him an email. Or better yet, go take a business class for too.
If you folks think UAL/CAL will keep CAL scope or reduce it, AND secure a decent pay raise, I would love some of that Ganja you smoking
You lecture me like a student about negotiation yet you lay out the exact case that you would cave for?!? Thanks for the advise neophyte, but just like Obama once said; "I got this"...
No smokin' at all... I heard it from an XJT guy at Hoot County late one night...
Growths.... now that's something we got!!!!