"GO AROUND"
Again?!?!?
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2005
- Posts
- 949
Sorry I don't subscribe to EITHER side being the "dark side". Just trying to get accurate information out there so that people can make EDUCATED decisions vs. EMOTIONAL decisions.
For example, if I say "the company offer still puts us dead last" in pay, I would want to burn this place down. However when I look at ALPA's own comparison chart, look at what all other carriers get, and look at the rest of the contract, I get a different perspective.
Credit goes out to ALPA for putting the numbers out there for us to look at. That is a much needed improvement. It is now the job and the responsibility of the membership to educate themselves on the true numbers.
Joe,
Why should we lower the bar by taking the companies offer? I'm not saying that we are going to raise the bar over what the company can afford, but I will not come in under what is already being paid to our peers. Just cause the company added years to the top of the longevity scale doesn't mean we are getting a raise. If the company would move on SCOPE I think you would see this get done a whole lot faster. What does it say that the company wants little or nothing to do with honoring the contract they are entering into? Says a lot to me.
As for operations people riding the JS, I welcome them. The real question RJMAN is if we were not so pissed off would you be willing to spend a shift on the ramp or other area's of operations to see what they deal with? I would. Southwest had a program like this I believe. Where pilots could get out on the ramp to see what goes on there and operations folks could ride the JS or cabin to see the other side.