LAFrequentflyer
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2005
- Posts
- 197
The first is to define "stabilized.". Where I work we define stabilized as on-speed, configured, in-trim, spooled with a rate of decent less than 1000 fpm at 1000 feet agl. In visual conditions the on-speed, spooled and in-trim parameters can be delayed until 500 feet agl provided the PF (pilot flying) announces the unstabilized condition thereby acknowledging it and his intent to be stabilized by 500 feet agl. Absent any one parameter a go-around occurs (or should) no questions asked. Now the "no questions asked" takes us to the second condition necessary to eliminate unstabilized approaches as a cause of accidents and that is culture. Flight operations management must state a live the axiom that a go-around is an excercise in good judgement rather than an admission of error. Period. This frees the troops out there where the rubber meets the road to use the judgement for which they are paid.
Sir / Ma'a,
Well said...I have often pushed a bad approach to landing thinking if i didn't it would be seen as a failure...Your words hit a bone and I know I need to change a bad attitude before it gets me hurt or killed.
Sincerely,
LA
Sir / Ma'a,
Well said...I have often pushed a bad approach to landing thinking if i didn't it would be seen as a failure...Your words hit a bone and I know I need to change a bad attitude before it gets me hurt or killed.
Sincerely,
LA