Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

APA Pilots polled. No to age 60.

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

AAflyer

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 26, 2001
Posts
1,493
AMERICAN AIRLINES PILOTS OVERWHELMINGLY REAFFIRM THEIR SUPPORT FOR RETIREMENT AT AGE 60


Safety of the traveling public was cited as the No. 1 reason for maintaining the current retirement rule


Fort Worth, Texas (March 15, 2007)—The Allied Pilots Association (APA), representing the 12,000 pilots of American Airlines (NYSE: AMR), released the results of two recently conducted polls that demonstrate strong continuing support for maintaining mandatory retirement at age 60 for the nation's commercial pilots.


In the first poll, 86 percent of American Airlines pilots favored the current retirement rule, while 12 percent reported that they wanted a change — an overwhelming 7-to-1 margin. When the poll results were broken down by age, they showed that even the oldest pilots expressed a desire to maintain mandatory retirement at age 60. Furthermore, the safety of the traveling public was cited as the No. 1 reason for maintaining the current regulation. This poll was conducted by the Wilson Center for Public Research, a professional survey organization with extensive experience conducting polls on behalf of a wide variety of pilot groups and other labor organizations. The poll, conducted by phone, used a stratified random sample that resulted in an accurate cross-section of the American Airlines pilot group. A total of 600 interviews were conducted, providing a sample margin of error of 4 percent.


APA also conducted an in-house, Internet-based survey. Of the 2,496 American Airlines pilots who responded, 79 percent indicated they support maintaining mandatory retirement at age 60, while 18 percent indicated they desire a change.


Federal Aviation Administrator Marion C. Blakey recently announced that the FAA will issue a formal Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) later this year that calls for raising retirement age to 65 to comply with a newly adopted international standard. Ironically, this untested standard requires that at least one pilot on the flight deck be under 60 years old, indicating that there continue to be legitimate concerns about how old is too old to operate commercial aircraft.


Since the FAA established age 60 retirement 48 years ago, not one single airline accident has been attributed to the sudden or subtle effects of aging. Multiple studies have shown that a pilot's mental and physical performance is impaired with increasing age, and there is no definitive medical or functional test that can determine which pilots could safely fly past age 60.


“The FAA should consider the concerns of the men and women in the cockpits who have personally witnessed the impact of advancing age on their fellow pilots,” said APA President Captain Ralph Hunter. “APA strongly supports the current mandatory retirement age of 60 until the FAA can definitely establish that there will be no decrease in the current level of flight safety. Without this assurance, any change would be tantamount to conducting an experiment on the traveling public.”


Founded in 1963, the Allied Pilots Association—the largest independent pilot union in the U.S.—is headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas. APA represents the 12,000 pilots of American Airlines, including more than 2,800 pilots on furlough. The furloughs began shortly after the September 11, 2001 attacks. Also, several hundred American Airlines pilots are on full-time military leave of absence serving in the armed forces. The union’s Web site address is www.alliedpilots.org.


American Airlines is the nation’s largest passenger carrier.
 
“The FAA should consider the concerns of the men and women in the cockpits who have personally witnessed the impact of advancing age on their fellow pilots,” said APA President Captain Ralph Hunter. “APA strongly supports the current mandatory retirement age of 60 until the FAA can definitely establish that there will be no decrease in the current level of flight safety. Without this assurance, any change would be tantamount to conducting an experiment on the traveling public.”


Wow. A union president said that? Not a word about how it's a done deal, that the EU has decided it for us, that we just need to "be a part of the process"?
 
ALPA sucks.
 
What if the age is raised to 65, can the APA negotiate a contract with AMR to keep the age at 60? Since they are in negotiations currently is this something that is being added to the contract?
 
TWA Dude,

You are 100% right, now if only ALPA would do the same.

Just my opinion, I could be wrong.

Champ42272
 
What if the age is raised to 65, can the APA negotiate a contract with AMR to keep the age at 60? Since they are in negotiations currently is this something that is being added to the contract?

There is a lot of talk about that, I am not sure where that may be going. It would most likely meet a lawsuit by some if AA forced them to quit at 60, however if the contract allowe pilots to retire at 60 with their retirement and there was penalty or no additional accruel past 60 that may work just as well.

Age 60 will most likely pass, however I am glad to see our union poll the membership and then represent and defend what the membership wants.

Best of Luck to all of us,

AAflyer
 
Safety of the traveling public. Then why do cargo guys have to retire at age 60? Why are any of us allowed to fly past age 60 in the same airspace as airliners? After all the airlines have said a blip is a blip for their user fee proposal. All accidents have occured involving pilots under age 60. Now which age group is the safety issue?
 
Beat ya to it!

Since this is a thread involving AA/APA I thought I'd go ahead and start the obligatory fight by saying that AA/APA sucks and TWA was the greatest thing since Orville and Wilbur took to the skies in the great state of North Carolina...
 
All accidents have occured involving pilots under age 60. Now which age group is the safety issue?

I've heard some great ones before, but this has got to be the dumbest statement regarding the age 60 rule, by those either for or against, ever made...
 
Safety of the traveling public. Then why do cargo guys have to retire at age 60?

"Safety of the Traveling Public".....but today we have American citizens flying on Airlines where the PIC is over age 60...in U.S. airspace, with the approval of the American government...and doing it safely...every single day.

I noticed that the APA said absolutely nothing about that. Does that mean that they are OK with it?

What about the Canadian ALPA carriers that allow the PIC to be over age 60...and they fly in U.S. airspace.....?

I guess there aren't enough fingers to plug all the leaks in the dike.

Tejas
 
"Safety of the Traveling Public".....but today we have American citizens flying on Airlines where the PIC is over age 60...in U.S. airspace, with the approval of the American government...and doing it safely...every single day.

Fer sher! Like those geniuses at China Air, wtih their super-duper engine-securing seatbelts? Or maybe those keen decision-makers at British Airways who value avoiding payouts to pax if the flight doesn't get them home quickly...so they flog a Whale from LAX to Ooops!...short-of-the-destination?

We need to be more like them?

What about the Canadian ALPA carriers that allow the PIC to be over age 60...and they fly in U.S. airspace.....?

Cool! Sign me up for universal health care, the Queen on our money, and nary a glimpse of the Stanley Cup in many years...and we'll talk.

"But Mom! Stevie has a bigger piece of pie than me!" is not a valid argument for a change that would disrupt the industry.

The safest mode of transportation on this blue marble is flying on a Part 121 airliner in the United States of America.

Ain't broke...don't "fix" it.
 
Since this is a thread involving AA/APA I thought I'd go ahead and start the obligatory fight by saying that AA/APA sucks and TWA was the greatest thing since Orville and Wilbur took to the skies in the great state of North Carolina...

You know how many ex-TWA employees it takes to change a light bulb?

3

One to replace it and two to talk about how good the old one was!


Seriously though, from what I've heard TWA was great and they really did get the shaft.
 
So....we're to understand that these pilots were over 60???

Keep up!

The premise is that we are inexorably obligated to mirror the policies and rules of ICAO airlines because they are safer...and their breath is fresh & minty.

Ain't so.

The Asian and European airlines certainly haven't cornered the market on aviation forehead-slap-inducing actions, but there is no compelling reason to do what they do just because they do it!
 
"Safety of the Traveling Public".....but today we have American citizens flying on Airlines where the PIC is over age 60...in U.S. airspace, with the approval of the American government...and doing it safely...every single day.

I noticed that the APA said absolutely nothing about that. Does that mean that they are OK with it?

What about the Canadian ALPA carriers that allow the PIC to be over age 60...and they fly in U.S. airspace.....?

I guess there aren't enough fingers to plug all the leaks in the dike.

Tejas

Typical response from an oldtimer. Shoots before he aims. How many Americans do you think are actually flying on foreign carriers with pilots over 60 since they just changed the rule recently? What, did the Europeans fire all the under 60 crowd. Probably less than .1% with the thousands of flights a day operated by U.S. carriers. We should do it since the EU has. Good reason! Maybe we should build a Maginal line to keep out terrorist too. It worked for the french. This is not about age discrimination or safety. Just greed..on both sides of the fence.

D
 
APA should start an expansion drive with ALPA carriers

APA needs to represent pilots at ALPA carriers.

Why pay ALPA 2% to misrepresent the majorities wishes because John Prater wants to give up without a fight because he thinks its a done deal according to his defeatist ideology.

Join APA!
Join APA!
Join APA!
Join APA!
Join APA!
Join APA!

APA does represent AMR pilots and the majority of ALPA pilots.

APA also has negotiated one of the best deals in the last five years.





 
Why doesn't alpa do a similiar poll now, I bet it would be about the same results. Why doesn't alpa do what the majority want? instead of pandering to the vocal minority? 7 to 1 in favor of keeping the status quo. that speaks volumes. Get some balls and do the right thing alpa.
 
APA needs to represent pilots at ALPA carriers.

Why pay ALPA 2% to misrepresent the majorities wishes because John Prater wants to give up without a fight because he thinks its a done deal according to his defeatist ideology.

Join APA!
Join APA!
Join APA!
Join APA!
Join APA!
Join APA!

APA does represent AMR pilots and the majority of ALPA pilots.

APA also has negotiated one of the best deals in the last five years.






Thank you for your comments. I can assure you we have our set of problems however when I posted this I posted it as an experiment in unionism.

Not wether age 60 would go through, or the merits of it. Personally I am against it. What I am impressed with, is we polled our members, tallied the count, and then the BOD and President represented what the membership wanted.

What I still think we need is some solidarity. I would like SWAPA polled. I would like to see ALPA carriers polled, not just a handful BUT ALL ALPA carriers. What does the NPA think, or IPA? Whe need polling at ALL airlines, and then if and only if we have a majority at each of these places we can all go to the hill as a group.

I would think it would be hard for the FAA or Congress to do anything if the majority of ALL US airlines said we are not interested in raising the age.

There is strength in numbers, regardless of union affiliation. In the end so many of us are fighting the same battles. SCOPE, PENSION, WAGES, OUTSOURCING, and CABOTAGE.

CAPA is a group of airlines consisting of the pilots of UPS,AA,Air Tan, SWA, ABX.

Would it be that hard to have a group that inlcuded ALPA. We each have our own unions that negotiate and represent respective airlines, however wether you work at JB, SWA, or UAL and every airline in between future issues like cabotage will impact all of us. We need a true national voice to fight issues like this.

Regards,

AAflyer
 
Last edited:
AAflyer, my issues with ALPA go way beyond age 60.

During the last three years I agree with every APA concern:

APA is concerned with management bonus payments.
APA is concerned with flying more than 14 hours for nothing.
APA kept the "A" plan pension.
APA wants its company to make it.
APA represents its majority.

APA needs to complete the mission it started in the late 1960's when it split from ALPA and represent MANY major airlines. ALPA needs a lot of competition to kick it in the butt and represent pilots, not airline managements or union officials in Herdon, VA. ALPA does not act according to right and wrong any longer, ALPA weighs the political issues and goes whatever way the wind is blowing regardless of the effect on its membership.

ALPA represents ALPA not pilots.
 
Last edited:
His job is to represent the interests of the pilots and the pilots have spoken.

and that job is so easy even a caveman could do it. oh wait, hunter is a caveman. aa pilots, please do not reelect the idiot.
 
and that job is so easy even a caveman could do it. oh wait, hunter is a caveman. aa pilots, please do not reelect the idiot.

And unionism isn't brain surgery. Pilots think they are so smart and then the pilots get out smarted time and time again and just end up looking stupid.

Mechanics and Flight Attendants don't negotiate years on end for a contract that is less than the duration of the negotiations. Mechanics ground airplanes and after three days of threating management get a good deal. FA threaten to walk and management believes them and either makes a deal or finds a judge to keep the FA's from acting.

But pilots just get out smarted. I want a caveman for a union leader. Cavemen act decisively.
 
Last edited:
AAflyer, my issues with ALPA go way beyond age 60.

During the last three years I agree with every APA concern:

APA is concerned with management bonus payments.
APA is concerned with flying more than 14 hours for nothing.
APA kept the "A" plan pension.
APA wants its company to make it.
APA represents its majority.

APA needs to complete the mission it started in the late 1960's when it split from ALPA and represent MANY major airlines. ALPA needs a lot of competition to kick it in the butt and represent pilots, not airline managements or union officials in Herdon, VA. ALPA does not act according to right and wrong any longer, ALPA weighs the political issues and goes whatever way the wind is blowing regardless of the effect on its membership.

ALPA represents ALPA not pilots.

I agree with you, I have been an ALPA member. It has become an institution. (However a union is better than none, and so much is still done by a select few who are elected.) However while we helped save teh company in 2003 we were dupped. We did not need to give the amount we gave. We were starting to become aligned with management and they would have taken more from us. That has seemed to stop.

I can say the JOB to represent is easier when you are dedicted to one group. We do have our own political infighting etc, but I guess in the end almost all the represent us want that they believe is best for us, the pilots of AA.

Thanks again for your support, I think we will be the only ones fighting the age 60 issue. In the end it won;t be much if a fight with some others remaining quiet.

Citation,

I think Hunter will be gone. There was a split among the top 3 presidental candidates. If you took the 2 against Hunter they exceeded him by almost 500 votes.

Regards,

AA
 
At least they are taking a stand for something.


Add that to the historic benchmarks of the profession List:
1)B-scale
2)Scope relief for Small jet operators (Eagle)
3) Staple is past practice for ALL future airline acquisitions
4) The only reason other airlines exist is because APA pilots cant do
everything....yet
5)If the APA is the high water mark of unionism then this profession
isn't dead its mummified.
 
Last edited:
Add that to the historic benchmarks of the profession List:
1)B-scale
2)Scope relief for Small jet operators (Eagle)
3) Staple is past practice for ALL future airline acquisitions
4) The only reason other airlines exist is because APA pilots cant do
everything....yet
5)If the APA is the high water mark of unionism then this profession
isn't dead its mummified.

Scope relief,

Ya, we were not the first. DAL was, and as of today almost 50% oftheir ASMs are flown be the RJs. We followed suit like everyone else, yet we have less 70seaters than ALL legacies except CAL. We also have less ASM flown than most all legacies.

B scale actually introduced as teh Blue Sky Agreement at UAL, perverted by Robert Crandall. Lastly many of your pilots were stapled, yet many when it happened were not. I will dispute your treatment was bad, but there are other cases poor treatment in the history of this industry. Every airline has added to in one or another, and one time or another the demise of our profession.

Regards,

AAflyer

Out of curiosity, I am not going to bother, I know where this headed, rather predictable but surprised it hasn't come up earlier.
 
Add that to the historic benchmarks of the profession List:
1) B-scale
2) Scope relief for Small jet operators (Eagle)
3) Staple is past practice for ALL future airline acquisitions
4) The only reason other airlines exist is because APA pilots cant do
everything....yet
5)If the APA is the high water mark of unionism then this profession
isn't dead its mummified.

And what did ALPA do concerning:

1) B-scale, ALPA allowed it at many carriers
2) Scope-- ALPA National failed miserably concerning RJ scope issues
3) Staple-- ALPA folded on the TWA issue with APA. ALPA national wasn't concerning with TWA?
4) Increasing standards--All ALPA contracts have a lower watermark than the APA contract.
5) Age 60- ALPA doesn't have a position. APA has a definable position.

APA issue for issue represents working pilots in todays environment.

APA has its problems but understands it purpose of protecting the careers of its pilots while ALPA is lost in its political swamp. ALPA has forgotten its purpose of protecting ALPA pilots after repeated failure as evidenced during the last six years.

When an ALPA negotiator, as I have seen many times, starts arguing the companies position, discounts todays issues because he knows the future, and is not concerned with managements pay, its shows ALPA is not concerned with that pilot groups problems.

When has ALPA national rejected an MECs TA vote because it fails to meet ALPA national standards? NEVER. ALPA national will sign anything.

ALPA national stands for nothing.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom