motch
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2006
- Posts
- 349
As a side note..
Great to see we are ordering more aircraft, both wide and narrow bodies. Hopefully they are for us and not a pre merger move to replace older UAL aircraft!
One thing I am worried about in a potential merger is scope and furloughs.
ALL MEC's need to INSIST that under no circumstances will fleet reduction due to a merger will result in furloughs while RJ feed increases. On top of that, all 70 seat jet flying needs to immeadiately stop at the level they are at.
There will be some mainline flying overlap but I do think there's more RJ overlap. That is the flying that needs to be replaced with mainline flying.
Always
Motch
Great to see we are ordering more aircraft, both wide and narrow bodies. Hopefully they are for us and not a pre merger move to replace older UAL aircraft!
One thing I am worried about in a potential merger is scope and furloughs.
ALL MEC's need to INSIST that under no circumstances will fleet reduction due to a merger will result in furloughs while RJ feed increases. On top of that, all 70 seat jet flying needs to immeadiately stop at the level they are at.
There will be some mainline flying overlap but I do think there's more RJ overlap. That is the flying that needs to be replaced with mainline flying.
Always
Motch