Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Airtran posts 4th quarter profit of 1.9 million

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Our pilot group does have the power to not include you in our contract. And our scope language keeps Southwest from code sharing with your airline.

Ponder that.

If you believe what you have written, you don't understand the process. Whatever, buddy. It's not my job to educate you.

See you on the other side, and we can resume this conversation then.
 
Ty,

You will get the Swapa contract when Swapa and SWA decide you will get it. Not a second before. Not even an arbitrator can give you our contract without Swapa and SWA deciding to give it to you. Enjoy your contract, we will enjoy ours.
 
If you believe what you have written, you don't understand the process. Whatever, buddy. It's not my job to educate you.

See you on the other side, and we can resume this conversation then.

Oh wise one, you are soooooo misinformed. There is absolutely NO requirement to have you on a SWAPA seniority list. We can easily allow the company (transition agreement with SWAPA and SWA) to operate Airtran separately. And being the acquired company, likely the courts will decide what will happen to you. We as a union legally do not require you to be members. And if you don't understand this, keep on living in your own "flat earth society".

Ty, there are now stickers at SWA that has your name with circle/slash to show the displeasure of this purchase. You are becoming infamous in a Lee Harvey Oswald kind of way.
 
I think its a two way street, and everyone needs to realize that. Is the SWA contract good, absolutely. But the AAI guys also have some resentment that our bargaining power was taken away from us, and we didn't get the contract we deserved because of it. If this deal falls through, then trust me, there will be uproar over our contract (not that there isn't enough already) that we signed. So ya, the AAI guys want this to go through, we all bet our current contract on it. It is also not the end all be all. This merger has already most likely cost me my upgrade, and that WILL cost me money over the next 5-10 years. Nobody can say for sure what would have happened in 15-20 years, just because SWA has a better contract now, doesn't mean they would have always had a better contract. WHo knows, AMR could have bought AAI, or AAI could have merged with ALA. There are many different scenerios that would have eventually played out. And remember, up until about 10 years ago, SWA was one of the bottom feeders as far as contract's go. The SWA guys also need to realize that you are hiring again because of the growth opportunities that AAI brings. That is a good thing for both pilot groups. This slows down upgrade times for AAI guys, and starts movement again for the SWA guys. Yes, the AAI guys are getting the better deal, but not if we get stapled. Hopefully, there will be a happy median between both pilot groups, and nobody will have a windfall.
 
Yes, the AAI guys are getting the better deal, but not if we get staple

Not true. My domicile rep says they were briefed by an outside consultant and that even a staple gives every pilot on your seniority list an increase in career earnings when the payrates, rigs, and retirement are factored in.
 
We are like spoiled children, we are not deserving of respect or understanding, and our claims laughable that us children will have the grownups hash it out....

These responses absolutely further inflames a dicey situation.....
Wrong again Dogg. Reread my post. It was directed specifically at you and I stand by my comments. As for what my response inflames, maybe you should take a good look in the mirror about the tone of your statements before you lecture me about stirring the pot.
 
Oh wise one, you are soooooo misinformed. There is absolutely NO requirement to have you on a SWAPA seniority list.

Nothing but Bond-McCaskill . . . , :erm: plus our CBA, which your management is a party to, as of DOCC. Not to mention the fact that only an idiot would want a quarter of their pilot group to be non-union.

So, I guess you could say that, other than Federal Law, our Contract, the RLA, and common sense, no, there's no requirement to have us on your seniority list.

Anyone else feel like they're just wasting their time trying to explain this stuff? :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Cool.

Keep your contract then.
It would not be the end of the world. I'm doing fine.
Let's be clear about what I was saying. Clearly your contract is better than ours and I will be glad to work under it too just as I am our current CBA. What I was getting at is that you and SWAPA are not "giving" us that or anything else for that matter. Your management (soon to be our management) will negotiate a new CBA with all of us.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top