Roughneck... It would be nice if you tried to keep this sensible as well. Do you honestly think we will be happy at the bottom end of your seniority list? The "alternative" as you say, is that AAI keeps growing, keeps expanding into the caribbean, and we possibly look to merge with a company such as ALA. While SWA continues to have the best contract out there, with relatively no growth, and no international flying.
Heres an idea. Put SWA's top 850 (the guys hired before AAI was even a company) on the top, put AAI's bottom 100 (the guys hired after SWA stopped hiring) on the bottom, and integrate everyone else 1-4 (or whatever the ratio would be between the remaining pilots), and then put up a 3-5 year fence. The AAI guys would lose a little relative seniority overall (they would lose a lot the first 5 years, but it wouldn't matter if there was a fence), but it wouldn't efffect anyone short term.
IMO, that would fall somewhere between relative seniority, and date of hire. At the end of 5 years, most of the top SWA guys would be gone (and a few of the AAI guys) and I "think" everyone would be only slightly unhappy. And IMO that would be a very good success.
Heres an idea. Put SWA's top 850 (the guys hired before AAI was even a company) on the top, put AAI's bottom 100 (the guys hired after SWA stopped hiring) on the bottom, and integrate everyone else 1-4 (or whatever the ratio would be between the remaining pilots), and then put up a 3-5 year fence. The AAI guys would lose a little relative seniority overall (they would lose a lot the first 5 years, but it wouldn't matter if there was a fence), but it wouldn't efffect anyone short term.
IMO, that would fall somewhere between relative seniority, and date of hire. At the end of 5 years, most of the top SWA guys would be gone (and a few of the AAI guys) and I "think" everyone would be only slightly unhappy. And IMO that would be a very good success.
Last edited: