Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Air France A-340 down in YYZ

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
They've already started blaming the pilots, because you know when a plane crashes its always the pilots fault.
 
transpondersoff said:
The media on CNN is speculating as usual. It could be a microburst, get there itis (sic), landing in a tailwind. I am waiting for them to say terrorist. They are speculating windshear and discussing the simularities of the Delta Dallas crash.

Hey, its a slow news day. This is like sex for the media.
 
"The wings don't know how fast your going across the ground, they only know how fast your going thru the air."

Anyone catch that doozy of an explanation?
 
learflyer said:
i'd like to know what the wx was upon landing........
Heavy rain and much lightning.
 
they are also saying that witnesses reported seeing "steam or smoke" coming from the back of the a/c after landing................DUH!!! IT'S POORING DOWN RAIN!!!!!!!!!! Look behind a car sometime while it's driving in the rain! It really is a comic affair with the media when there's something up with aviation.
 
direct quote from foxnews:

"yes, the aircraft is an airbus A340-300 with 291 aboard which is, as i'm aware, more than the plane can carry"

how is that possible? are people standing in the aisles? i wonder if they get half-off their tieckets....
 
they're talking about a windshear maybe bringing it down or else forcing it off the runway. no news yet on fatalities but both pilots lived. maybe they'll be able to shed a lot of light on it.
 
cforst513 said:
direct quote from foxnews:

"yes, the aircraft is an airbus A340-300 with 291 aboard which is, as i'm aware, more than the plane can carry"

how is that possible? are people standing in the aisles? i wonder if they get half-off their tieckets....

A340-300 seats 295
 
I love the job and explinations of Wolf Blitzer and Miles Obrien. They are the true experts my friends.
 
Latest I heard is that the CA & FO and multiple passengers and crew (hopefully a great many) survived and have been taken away.
 
haha...Sheperd Smith just said "we can only assume that the plane had less fuel when it arrived in Toronto than it did when it left France." lol......
 
User997 said:
"The wings don't know how fast your going across the ground, they only know how fast your going thru the air."

Anyone catch that doozy of an explanation?

That guy is an idiot!!

"When the plane encounters windshear the pilot reduces the power because of the increase in headwind......."

"The pilots had getthereitis"
 
A witness is claiming that he saw the aircraft struck by lighting on the rollout!!!!!!!!!
 
I sent an email to CNN to tell that Miles dude to shut up, what a tool, and I think he's spoting wood right now, he's the "aviation expert".
 
Can't they dig up Nance or anyone with half a brain? Nuts.
 
Hello all. Not having flown this type of plane, but having around 1100 total time, I am sure many of you know, that it is NOT ATC's fault this plane landed. You are taught from the start of your training, that you can decline a clearance or an approach if weather is that bad for you to make a landing. I am curious why this plane did infact continue an approach. Also, was this the only plane at the time coming in to land? We just don't know. Watching MSNBC, because I feel Robert Hager is a very knowledgable person when it comes to these situations. FOX doesn't have someone like Mr. Hager/.
 
Global TV is reporting "no fatalities." Hope they're right but would be shocked if everyone was that lucky. CA and FO have survived.
 
BoDEAN said:
Hello all. Not having flown this type of plane, but having around 1100 total time, I am sure many of you know, that it is NOT ATC's fault this plane landed. You are taught from the start of your training, that you can decline a clearance or an approach if weather is that bad for you to make a landing. I am curious why this plane did infact continue an approach. Also, was this the only plane at the time coming in to land? We just don't know. Watching MSNBC, because I feel Robert Hager is a very knowledgable person when it comes to these situations. FOX doesn't have someone like Mr. Hager/.

Maybe because the Capt thought it was OK............
 
GuinessGuy said:
A witness is claiming that he saw the aircraft struck by lighting on the rollout!!!!!!!!!

....although the view through the bottom of his bong may have distorted the light a little bit.
 
gkrangers said:
Fox News is interviewing someone who just got there Private pilot license, asking for their "professional" opinion.

I just heard this too - LMAO!

I swear, if I ever have a daughter, I'd rather her tell me that she wants to be a two dollar hooker than a journalist.
 
bigD said:
I just heard this too - LMAO!

I swear, if I ever have a daughter, I'd rather her tell me that she wants to be a two dollar hooker than a journalist.

LOL.... I agree.... what a bunch of idiots......

He told them that if there is a tailwind, that a wing can't fly.......
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom