Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Calling TWA pilots new hires is a joke. New hires don't come with aircraft.
stlflyguy
For all you guys involved in this supp W letter 3 stuff, let me ask you this; would things have worked out a lot better if the healthy airlines back in 2000-2001 just let TWA die via Chapter 7, because thats where they were ultimately headed, and just have picked up the TWA assets and routes in a fire sale? Then there wouldn't be all this fuss about whether they should have been considered a new hire or not. It would then be quite clear! AA must be kicking themselves over that purchase.
If you were actually smart enough to predict the exact moment of an airline's death you'd be far too wealthy to be just an airline pilot. TWA's financial problems notwithstanding it's pure speculation to say if or how soon it would've liquidated.For all you guys involved in this supp W letter 3 stuff, let me ask you this; would things have worked out a lot better if the healthy airlines back in 2000-2001 just let TWA die via Chapter 7, because thats where they were ultimately headed, and just have picked up the TWA assets and routes in a fire sale?
No, they're just kicking their pilots.AA must be kicking themselves over that purchase.
That is not the point nor is it what the arbitrator meant by his ruling. The basic logic of his ruling is that you cannot create positions and then bypass Letter 3 by placing junior pilots on the seniority list in those positions. Any other ruling would have negated the prior contractual obligations as well as seniority.
Why doesn't AMR just bag the entire AE operation, sell it off, then put out the feed for bid?
Apparently contractual obligations are not important to the Eaglets when it isn't in their favor, or more than 800 furloughed AMERICAN AIRLINES pilots would have been allowed to flow back to Eagle.
For all you guys involved in this supp W letter 3 stuff, let me ask you this; would things have worked out a lot better if the healthy airlines back in 2000-2001 just let TWA die via Chapter 7, because thats where they were ultimately headed, and just have picked up the TWA assets and routes in a fire sale? Then there wouldn't be all this fuss about whether they should have been considered a new hire or not. It would then be quite clear! AA must be kicking themselves over that purchase.
I always found it odd that an Airline that declared bankruptcy on a Sunday and was purchased out of bankruptcy later that same Sunday never:
- Went to the employees for concessions,
- Attempted to renegotiate aircraft leases, or
- Attempted to renegotiated property/facility leases
It just went straight into BK with DIP financing and a purchase agreement already in place. A purchase agreement that had language about "Fair and Equitable" seniority integration. Oh, and for the "What's fair for for me, might not be fair for you" crowd, that is a ridiculous rationalization that has nothing to do with fairness.
As far as the financial performance of TWA, from 1996 to 2001, the long term debt was reduced from $1.5B to $500M, that's a reduction of one billion dollars. Not too bad by today's standards.
Woulda coulda what he said!shoulda. It was a great deal....... right up until 9/11 and the ensuing dismantling of commercial aviation.
Gup
Apparently contractual obligations are not important to the Eaglets when it isn't in their favor, or more than 800 furloughed AMERICAN AIRLINES pilots would have been allowed to flow back to Eagle.
Yes,it would have worked out better. I wouldn't have a senoirity number at AA for the past 8.5 years. It is like the kiss of death.
VS Chapter 7. When did you get your crystal ball out. That's where they were ultimately heading? You mean like all the legacy airlines? Do you know there were other options for TWA. Who's to say,it wouldn't have gone the other way,you? OK PATZER.
As far as the financial performance of TWA, from 1996 to 2001, the long term debt was reduced from $1.5B to $500M, that's a reduction of one billion dollars. Not too bad by today's standards.
it's a dangerous policy to penalize a labor group for poor management decisions.
The flow through to AA never adversely affected AA pilots but 800 AA pilots flowing back to Eagle would cause Eagle FO's with years on the job to be furloughed so an AA new-hire could take a CA seat Eagle. Not to mention the 800 CA's that would have had their pay cut in half to make room for AA new hires, many of which had absolutely no airline PIC time. Do you think that is any where within the realm of reasonable? And even as it stands, far more AA pilots made out great in the flow back(about 400), as opposed to the Eagle pilots that actually flowed through(about 150).
Eagle MEC signed the agreement, including the unlimited flowback provision, and when it didn't go their way they sued to have it overturned. You either honor your contracts or you don't. I hope they're enjoying their RJs cause they'll never see anything bigger.
Eagle MEC signed the agreement, including the unlimited flowback provision, and when it didn't go their way they sued to have it overturned. You either honor your contracts or you don't. I hope they're enjoying their RJs cause they'll never see anything bigger.
The flow through to AA never adversely affected AA pilots but 800 AA pilots flowing back to Eagle would cause Eagle FO's with years on the job to be furloughed so an AA new-hire could take a CA seat Eagle. Not to mention the 800 CA's that would have had their pay cut in half to make room for AA new hires, many of which had absolutely no airline PIC time. Do you think that is any where within the realm of reasonable? And even as it stands, far more AA pilots made out great in the flow back(about 400), as opposed to the Eagle pilots that actually flowed through(about 150).
What about the THOUSANDS of pilot jobs at AA that were moved to the Eagle operation with the parking of Folker and 727 jets..... Where is the recognition that those Eagle Captains and FO's only have their jobs on the backs of the bottom third of the AA list?
Eagle, and any other regional for that matter, is flying pointy-nose jets over x number of seats because mainline pilots allowed it to happen. Obviously the specifics of what happened vary from airline to airline, but that is the bottom line. To blame the regional pilots for this decision is absurd. Management took what mainline unions granted them, and ran with it.
Well Eagle is hiring and getting 22 more CRJ-700s.... is this related?
Bad news either way.....there are plenty of CFI's frothing at the mouth to get hired at AE and fly that "big" plane..... not knowing or caring where the job came from.
Exactly! AA pilots could have had all of that jet flying, but APA wouldn't sign off on it. They instead went with the hard core scope argument and lost a lot of AA pilot positions because of it. Just as the current APA leadership has overstepped, the guys in 1999 were too short-sighted. Those rj's would have paid less that the Fokkers and the MD-80's, but would have been more than what Eagle pays its pilots.
My point was answering the Eaglet who wanted us to cry him a river on how the poor Eagle Captains felt getting pushed back with the flowbacks from AA, and I was commenting that their jobs were there because of the AA in the first place.
Also, the main reason the "RJ" proliferates is because it could be operated at "regional" wages. If it paid close to mainline wages, they would start parking them.