Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

A letter to a Delta Friend

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
It should priority number 1 to secure all flying at the mainline level. There is nothing worth giving away our jobs. It needs to be in the joint contract that any further aircraft go on the mainline ticket. Giving away the 100 seat flying would be detrimental to the New DAL. that flying needs to be done at the mainline level or the dc9s and dc9-80s will fall victim just as the 737-200's and 300's did. Whether its E-190s the new C-series or if Boeing ever comes through with a new hundred seater they belong at mainline. Priority #1
 
Both carriers have strong career outlooks and both have tremendous strengths. This is more a merger of equals on most respects, in my eye. I assume lets go to arbitration for the SLI and get it over with (that is what is going to happen anyways- there will be b*tching from both sides as usual, too.)


Regardless, let's get a joint contract and all get more money in our pockets.


Great post!! I agree
 
Does that "dynamic seniority" apply to both ends of the list? If you are trying to keep NWA pilots in NWA airplanes, then it should also be NWA pilots who feel the pinch of a retiring NWA airframe.

Of course. There is contention over future retirements at each company, "dynamic seniority" takes that factor out of the combined list. Once you agree to that you only have to figure out the proper ratio based on all of the other factors mentioned here. It still isn't simple but it solves a HUGE SLI issue so they can move on.
 
It should priority number 1 to secure all flying at the mainline level. There is nothing worth giving away our jobs. It needs to be in the joint contract that any further aircraft go on the mainline ticket. Giving away the 100 seat flying would be detrimental to the New DAL. that flying needs to be done at the mainline level or the dc9s and dc9-80s will fall victim just as the 737-200's and 300's did. Whether its E-190s the new C-series or if Boeing ever comes through with a new hundred seater they belong at mainline. Priority #1


The replacement aircraft for the 100 -125 seat DC-9 must pay at least what the current payscale is. If ALPA caved on the payscale to bring a "regional" jet, "ERJ, 170-195 on the property, they will have succeeded in replacing higher paying pilot positions. And according to latest media reports, the Regional Airline Association is pushing to replace their inefficient 50 seat birds with bigger 120 seat regional jets, or be forced out of the business altogether.
 
Jetflyer:

Need to get them on the property first. Reference DAL's 737-700's that now pay -800 rates. You are senior enough to not have to bid it if you do not want to. But, if the DC9's are replaced (as I think they will be) there might not be enough slots to go around and your relative seniority decreases.

It should priority number 1 to secure all flying at the mainline level.

Priority #1
Agreed!

Let me add to that. The SLI would not be as big a problem if being at the bottom of the list with the DC9's future being uncertain was not such a problem. A better scope solution would take a lot of heat off the SLI for junior Captains and FO's.
 
Last edited:
BTW, what is all this about "the 767 paying the same as the 757" from the letter? The 757 pay rates are the same as the 767, however you look at it...and however you look at it, it pays more per hour than the A330. So, I look at it as our 757 pays more than the A330. Happy?
Um, no....because, actually, it doesn't!
 
Um, no....because, actually, it doesn't!

You're right. A A330 Capt makes $162/hr right now and a DAL 757 Capt. makes $160/hr right now.

How many NWA A330 Capts are there vs. DAL 757 Capts?

Now add the higher paying eqipment of the 767-400 ($181) and the 777 ($191) and compare those numbers to the 747 ($179)and the non-existant 787 ($165).

How many 747 Capts vs 767-400 and 777 Capt?
 
You're right. A A330 Capt makes $162/hr right now and a DAL 757 Capt. makes $160/hr right now.Actually, A330 CA's make $167/hr due to 100% of A330 flying being international.

How many NWA A330 Capts are there vs. DAL 757 Capts? 350 A330 CA's

Now add the higher paying eqipment of the 767-400 ($181) and the 777 ($191) and compare those numbers to the 747 ($179)($184)and the non-existant 787 ($165)($170).

How many 747 Capts vs 767-400 and 777 Capt? 315 747CA's
You're 767's pay 10% more than our 757's. Just like your 737's pay 10% more than our A320/319. I simply corrected Peanuckle's statement that DAL 767's pay more than NWA A330's. No need to get your double-breasted panties in a wad.;)
You're right.
Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, I should have specified. FO payrates up through year 7-8 or so are higher on the 767/757 than the 330. I'm not a smart man, but I do know what love is.
 
... this just in ...

Monday, May 12, 2008 - 4:07 PM EDT
Steenland: Fuel costs may shrink merged Delta/NorthwestAtlanta Business Chronicle

Minneapolis-St. Paul will retain a "vibrant" hub and a substantial number of jobs if a Delta-Northwest merger moves forward, Northwest Airlines Corp. CEO Doug Steenland told business leaders Monday. But he said that soaring fuel costs may ultimately shrink local operations.

Speaking at a meeting of the St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce, Steenland said the combined carrier will keep its reservation offices, data center and flight-training facility open following the close of the deal. Overall, he expects the deal to have a similar impact on the Twin Cities as the 1998 merger between Minneapolis-based Norwest Corp. and San Francisco-based Wells Fargo; In that deal, Minneapolis lost a corporate headquarters, but ultimately gained more jobs.

But Steenland cautioned that with the price of oil soaring, it's hard to predict how many workers the carrier will employ into the future. "This can only go on so long," Steenland said, of airlines absorbing the high price of fuel. "Fuel costs will have to be passed onto consumers. That will mean higher fares, so we'll see demand come down, and the airline will have to shrink."

Atlanta-based Delta Air Lines Inc. (NYSE: DAL) and Northwest (NYSE: NWA) last week began crafting a plan for integrating the carriers, Steenland said. The companies expect the merger to close by the end of the year. Northwest may operate as a standalone airline for a full year after the deal wraps up, he said.

While the combined airline's headquarters will be based in Atlanta, the merged company will continue to have a big presence in the Twin Cities. "What won't be different is that Minneapolis-St. Paul will continue to be a vibrant, robust hub," Steenland said.

The airline also will continue to support Twin Cities cultural institutions and non-profits, he said.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top