EdAtTheAirport
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2005
- Posts
- 298
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
u can go 180 if u want and not 250 and you don't have to notify ATC
Some of you have obviouslly not dealt with this much. It is not that simple unless you have good local knowledge, otherwise it becomes a huge distraction.
1. Most of the time I have encountered this the Navaid that the Class B is predicated on is either A...hard to determine because of the complexit compressed onto a small chart, B. based on a NavAid that isn't on the arrival there are a finite number of VOR receivers on any airplane. C. Based on Some VFR margin like a shoreline or a river - is radar now a considered a NavAid?
2. The 10-1 chart for these airports are not with the approach charts. OAK/SJC= SFO, LGB/ONT/SNA=LAX.
We have enough to do in the terminal area as it is. If we are on an IFR clearence then this speed should not apply.
If someone can find out how to go about making an NPRM I will support it.
How about just eliminating all this wedding cake crap and just push the Class B to the ground. If you want to be anywhere near the busier Class B's especially New York, NorCal and SoCal, and Chicago - you gotta talk to somebody. There are so many busy airports in such a close proximity with jet traffic constantly in and out of these areas it's ridicules you can skirt by without talking to anyone. If you are too afraid to talk to anyone in these areas then you shouldn't be within 50 miles of any of these airports.
Later
well excuse me with your vast hundred hours in your 172. Obviously you don't know how to find charts or maybe you dont carry them...and any private pilot can look at a sectional and figure out where the class B is for a given area, right?
FAR 11.23 says, "The Administrator initiates rulemaking procedure on his own motion. However, in doing so, he considers the recommendations of other agencies of the United States and the petitions of other interested persons." Once the Administrator initiates the procedure, creating a new rule is basically a three-phase project, which is spelled out in FAR Part 11. Phase I may include public hearings, conducting studies, reviewing already submitted petitions, and hosting meetings.
At any rate I agree about dropping the floor to the ground, or eliminating the rule altogether...
You know you're under the shelf by DME. Of course, if you're doing what you're supposed to, your DME is tuned to some other source (either the VOR on the arrival you're flying, or ILS that you're gonna fly). Then again, some Class B's are centered around something that isn't even a navaid.
Once you figure you're kinda close to being underneath, then you gotta find out if you're north of some radial. Again, the NAV equipment is setup for your arrival or your approach, rather than the 312 radial of the primary airport, which you're not going to. And that's IF the Class B is based off of a navaid. Some are centered around an airport (EWR?); how do I DME Newark Airport?
And then there are the Class B's that use highways or some other criteria to divide the sections.
And no, Position, ATC has no responsibility to tell you you're under Class B. You must be flying around MSP Class B, or somewhere nice. As far as the law goes, it's our job to know when we're underneath -- somehow.