Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA delaying new planes, adding used Westjet birds --article

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
You don't own the captain seats nor the airplanes AT brings to the table. If you want to talk about business transactions. Just saying!

Sorry, in arbitration they would! (all 3 sides agree to it---management, and both pilot groups) The arbitrators decide where people will sit. No wonder it was avoided...


Bye Bye---General Lee
 
Obviously you expected to get everything.

No, I just expected to keep what I already had. You weren't happy until you stole everything that we had.
 
Even with arbitration, that may have been tough to get. You probably would have had your current seat, and since you were a smaller airline you might have gotten a little less seniority.

Possibly, but it wouldn't be because we were a smaller airline, it would have been because SWA had a higher rate of retirements in the next few years. It is likely than an arbitration panel would have given them credit for that, but we're talking a few percent at most, not the 15% that I lost, or the 32% that most of our captains lost.

Base wise, a purchasing company can do whatever they want with that (ie CVG shrunk, along with MEM).

Oh, don't misunderstand, General. I'm not saying that they should have been forced to keep a base at all, let alone a base of a certain size. But what's hard to accept is that they are keeping a base, but very few of the pilots who actually brought that base to the merger are going to be able to hold it. We're probably looking at a base of about 400-500 pilots in Atlanta when it's all said and done. Half of those are captain positions that none of our pilots will be able to hold, so the other half will only be able to be held by former AirTran captains (now mid-seniority and senior FOs) and "real" SWA pilots. AirTran FOs will be waiting many years to get back to Atlanta. For me, it's almost a decade.
 
No, I just expected to keep what I already had. You weren't happy until you stole everything that we had.

And that would be operating as a subsidary. Welcome to Agreement 2. Same seat, same base, same QOL, same pay. The MEC blew it.
 
And that would be operating as a subsidary. Welcome to Agreement 2. Same seat, same base, same QOL, same pay. The MEC blew it.

red, you can keep pretending that the only options were ever going to be AIP1 or AIP2 (or nothing), but those of us with a brain (and a spine) know that going to arbitration was a viable option.
 
Pretending? No. You could have tried to go to arbitration. Gary could have just run you as a stand alone for as long as SWAPA would have allowed it. It's anybodies guess if he would have pulled that card.

So arbitration was down the road after a few more hurdles, but it didn't workout that way and I think you wouldn't have been happy with the results if it had gone that far. (We'll never really know at this point)
 
Possibly, but it wouldn't be because we were a smaller airline, it would have been because SWA had a higher rate of retirements in the next few years. It is likely than an arbitration panel would have given them credit for that, but we're talking a few percent at most, not the 15% that I lost, or the 32% that most of our captains lost.



Oh, don't misunderstand, General. I'm not saying that they should have been forced to keep a base at all, let alone a base of a certain size. But what's hard to accept is that they are keeping a base, but very few of the pilots who actually brought that base to the merger are going to be able to hold it. We're probably looking at a base of about 400-500 pilots in Atlanta when it's all said and done. Half of those are captain positions that none of our pilots will be able to hold, so the other half will only be able to be held by former AirTran captains (now mid-seniority and senior FOs) and "real" SWA pilots. AirTran FOs will be waiting many years to get back to Atlanta. For me, it's almost a decade.




Let's revisit SIA 1.....

Captain retention slots for 10 years

I could be wrong, but wasn't there a fence around ATL?
 
Pretending? No. You could have tried to go to arbitration. Gary could have just run you as a stand alone for as long as SWAPA would have allowed it. It's anybodies guess if he would have pulled that card.

It was not a guess. It was a process agreement. Then he changed his mind after the first vote did not go his way. So he made an agreement then broke it. I was shocked, but some were not as surprised as I was. They did not think this stuff in writing meant anything and believed the rumors more. If only there was no process agreement in writing and the rumors going around were in writing. Turned out the stuff on paper meant nothing and the rumors meant everything.

What is done is done. No sense in talking about it in the workplace. No good can come from it. Stressing about it will just make you lose your medical quicker or kill ya quicker in the end.


http://swamedia.com/releases/e92ed2d6-ca48-da7f-caa0-6b004da76053

Southwest Airlines Pilots, AirTran Pilots, and Carriers Reach Four-Party Agreement
Pact Provides for Implementation Schedule
Earlier today, the respective Unions representing Southwest Airlines (NYSE: LUV) and AirTran Airways Pilots, as well as both Companies signed a Four-Party Process Agreement that provides for the two pilot groups to begin their seniority integration discussions prior to legal closing of the AirTran acquisition. It also outlines provisions of an implementation schedule in the event an agreement is reached on an integrated seniority list (ISL). Southwest anticipates closing on its acquisition of AirTran Airways in second quarter of 2011.

"This is yet another important step in the overall process of bringing these two great carriers together," said Mike Van de Ven, Southwest Airlines Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. "I applaud both sides for signing this important agreement that lays the groundwork for bringing together these two hard working Pilot groups."

The Southwest Airlines Pilots' Association (SWAPA) and the Air Line Pilots' Association (ALPA) can now begin the work of integrating seniority lists in accordance with the McCaskill-Bond Act. This new Four-Party Process Agreement also creates a timeline for SWAPA and ALPA to reach an ISL agreement. If an agreement is not reached during this timeframe, the matter will be sent to arbitration and a new implementation process will have to be negotiated.

After nearly 40 years of service, Southwest Airlines continues to differentiate itself from other low fare carriers--offering a reliable product with exemplary Customer Service. Southwest Airlines is the nation's largest carrier in terms of originating domestic passengers boarded, now serving 72 cities in 37 states. Southwest also is one of the most honored airlines in the world known for its commitment to the triple bottom line of Performance, People, and Planet. To read more about how Southwest is doing its part to be a good citizen, visit southwest.com/cares to read the Southwest Airlines One Report(TM). Based in Dallas, Southwest currently operates more than 3,400 flights a day and has nearly 35,000 Employees systemwide.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southwest_Airlines

An entity called Guadeloupe Holdings was formed by Southwest and currently acts as a wholly owned subsidiary of Southwest Airlines and holding company for AirTran's current operations and assets. Southwest's organized labor groups have ceded contractual "scope" provisions pending acceptable negotiated seniority integration agreements. Operations of the two airlines will remain isolated until terms of this integration are fully negotiated (or arbitrated). Bound by federal law, such as McCaskill-Bond legislation, as well as a four-party process agreement, Southwest has confirmed that it will integrate all of the pilots in a fair and equitable manner.[6]

Now wiki can be edited.
 
Last edited:
Let's revisit SIA 1.....

Captain retention slots for 10 years

I could be wrong, but wasn't there a fence around ATL?

Was the airline going to keep ATL the same size? What if they shrunk it down to bare bones? (like now) Would those CAPT slots have been protected to go elsewhere had the flying been brought down? That would have been nice. MEM was brought down, but those senior guys took their seniority over to ATL on the MD88 and 320.


Bye Bye---General Lee
 

Latest resources

Back
Top