shagadelic
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 16, 2002
- Posts
- 309
Arbitration would have resulted in a lot closer to relative.
When both sides are pi$$ed it normally indicates a pretty fair deal, like what we have now...however, when one side feels it was given a lopsided loss and the other side feels good about the deal, the integration normally doesn't go so well. I think of Frontier and US Air as recent examples. I'm not saying they got a fair deal or not, but I'm saying one side felt very wronged while the other side was good with the deal. The integration in both of those cases has yet to happen, and in Frontier's case, probably won't. Given SWA management's relationship with SWAPA, and the deal offered that our management considered very fair and that they themselves had a hand in, I believe an arbitrated deal giving AT near relative seniority would have been your worse-case scenario...but we'll never know. I do know the AT guys I've flown have been great guys. Everyone has been more than happy with how things have been going, how they've been welcomed, and they all say they are paid more now. Hopefully we'll start to grow in 2015 to help ease any bitterness remaining on both sides.