BILL LUMBERG
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2005
- Posts
- 2,074
I'm not familiar with that statute. Can you please site your source?
The rules vary state by state.....you asked, so go hunt it out.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not familiar with that statute. Can you please site your source?
Jack is no liar. Now, did he not understand his own documents? Has he forgotten some of the nuances over the past two years? Sure, that's possible. But intentionally lying about them? Not his style.
.
The ATN MC negotiated the framework of SIA #1 (otherwise known as AIP #1). The language used to define the intent of AIP #1 was drafted by the ATN MC Vice Chair, ATN NC Chair, the ATN Contract Administrator, and the ATN MEC's outside counsel. Are you saying the 4 of them had no experience in drafting language?The problem, as you know, was that the documents were horribly written with loopholes strewn throughout them. Max talks with such confidence about the "protections," because that's what he believes the intent of the documents were, but the problem is that intent doesn't get you very far when the language itself is full of loopholes. Language always trumps intent and bargaining history. Of course, Max has virtually no experience, so he doesn't understand that. It's not his fault. He just never should have been involved in the first place.
Funny thing is it appears one of the co-producers of the youTube video had his own personal experience with using a camera to take pictures without another party's consent in a previous union positionNothin illegal about taping but.......publishing it on YouTube/internet without his permission.
To bad you can't make any money bitching. Air Tran guys would be rich!! So until it pays to complain, most of you (I said most Ty!) have to fly airplanes to pay the bills.
:bawling:
To bad you can't make any money bitching. Air Tran guys would be rich!! So until it pays to complain, most of you (I said most Ty!) have to fly airplanes to pay the bills.
:bawling:
The ATN MC negotiated the framework of SIA #1 (otherwise known as AIP #1). The language used to define the intent of AIP #1 was drafted by the ATN MC Vice Chair, ATN NC Chair, the ATN Contract Administrator, and the ATN MEC's outside counsel. Are you saying the 4 of them had no experience in drafting language?
No kidding. Its like getting paid for being an A-hole. Oh wait.... You guys do get paid for that.
To bad you can't make any money bitching. Air Tran guys would be rich!! So until it pays to complain, most of you (I said most Ty!) have to fly airplanes to pay the bills.
:bawling:
No, you don't.Oh, crap! In addition to property management and flightinfo bitching, now I gotta fly airplanes, too?![]()
:laugh:
No, you don't.
Funny thing is it appears one of the co-producers of the youTube video had his own personal experience with using a camera to take pictures without another party's consent in a previous union position![]()
Funny thing is it appears one of the co-producers of the youTube video had his own personal experience with using a camera to take pictures without another party's consent in a previous union position
I only have second hand knowledge of the incident at the old NPA that led to removal of the former BOD member. I will let Ty Webb or Fletch717 fill in the details as they were on property.What happen?
Hard to believe anyone has the time to make that video or maybe they really are obsessed with it.
So you are saying Frank and Bryan crafted language for SIA #1 without using our lawyers' assistance in capturing the intent of AIP #1?But what I am saying is that two of the people in your little list there said plainly that the language was full of loopholes.
So you are saying Frank and Bryan crafted language for SIA #1 without using our lawyers' assistance in capturing the intent of AIP #1?
No, you don't.