They get first dibs, and they get to name their own price, and United just has to bend over and take it? I find that highly unlikely.
Skywest only has the first right of refusal for the 75 replacement aircraft and the right to grown 15 aircraft within the life of the XJT CPA.
You were involved with the negotiations?? Cool
This is public information.
If its a new RFP, then no. Also, doesn't sound like a swap. Sounds like growth.
This is false. Skywest has the first right of refusal on the 75 large aircraft replacement, from the XJT CPA. It doesn't mean they will match any proposal submitted. There is also a right to grow 15 aircraft.
See my post above. Out of the supposed 168 aircraft, 90 of them can potentially go to XJT (75 replacement and 15 growth). But I do agree with you that overall, even with all 90 of these aircraft going to XJT, they will still shrink.
UAL can only add about 60ish large RJs to UAX until they establish a Small narrowbody/DAL 717 type fleet at mainline. After that they can add up to 325 total large RJs in exchange for a ton of 50 seaters.
- No 76-seat aircraft until Jan. 1, 2014
Legacy United 70-seat and turboprop limits until then
- After Jan 1, 2014
Cap 70-/76-seat aircraft at 255 hulls
No more than 130 76-seat aircraft
Q400 included in 76-seat aircraft count limits
UAL currently has 148 70-seat aircraft and 35 Q400s
Under United Pilot Agreement definitions, UAL currently has 183 of the 255 70/76-seat aircraft
- After Jan. 1, 2016
Cap 76-seat aircraft at 153
Can go above 153 76-seat aircraft if SNB aircraft added to UAL fleet which forces reduction of 70-seat aircraft to 102 cap
Must park 50-seat aircraft if going above 153 76-seat aircraft
Maximum UAX hard cap of 450 total hulls, from current 588
XJT has its issues, but the company is far from poorly run. Mesa and Trans States are poorly run companies, not XJT.
I assure you that you could not do any better, and in fact, much worse if you were put in charge tomorrow
If this isn't poorly run, I can't imagine this being close to normal ops for you guys! Talking from an operational standpoint (not that they've made any money either), this company is the most poorly run in the last 7 years. It's only gotten worse since December 2010.