Get ASA/XJT Combined Seniority List

[Nevets]

A little full of ourselves aren't we. You do bring value to Skywest Inc, as does Skywest Inc bring value to you. Now here is the question. Who needs the other more. In my opinion, Skywest Inc. will be fine even if this doesn't happen. ExpressJet on the other hand may not fare as well if this falls through.

Pride goeth before the fall.

AVoiceofReason

Of course Inc brings great value to XJT. That is exactly why I said it was mutually beneficent. But keep in mind that it's Inc that has initiated this for the second time in two years.

Pride? Of course I have pride! I have pride in this profession and rather not be a part of JA plans to make a farce out of our contract just becuase he doesn't have respect for gus new employees. Yes, personally I rather go it alone then to let this whipsaw continue.

 

[Data]

How did Delta and Northwest handle it, was it a combination of DOH and relative seniority or were the groups matched closely enough to do relative seniority without too many problems? I've heard, and don't know if it's true, that the worst a Delta/NW guy did was a loss of 1.5% seniority. Isn't that going to be the model for ALPA going forward?

 

[IFLYASA]

Based on a relative seniority list, there would be around 300 xjt pilots who were hired "after" me, now become senior to me. That doens't seem very fair.

 

[Whydoitry]

Based on a relative seniority list, there would be around 300 xjt pilots who were hired "after" me, now become senior to me. That doens't seem very fair.

Why is that not fair if your relative seniority is the same?

 

[CFI2766]

Would you be willing to PM me your information so I can see why that error exists?

I stand corrected. There is someone on the XJT list who has the same last name, a pretty uncommon last name, that I do. I got it wrong when I saw the other pilot with my last name.

That being said, what is the point of creating this list? In the context of creating a merger that is better for everyone involved, what was really accomplished in doing this?

I'm not trying to insult you personally, I just don't see the logic here. It's a lot like saying, 'Look, here's a model I built of what I think the next super-dooper regional airplane will look like...See, it's reallllly shiny!!'

No one can accurately predict what the list will look like at this time. This merger will only work if at least 51% of the combined list is happy and the entire pilot group thinks that a merged airline is better than two separate entities. Doest this hypothetical list forward the merger in any way?

 

[IFLYASA]

Why is that not fair if your relative seniority is the same?

Ok
For example, let's say these 300 pilots who were hired after me all decide to come to ATL and bid my airplane. Just go with this. Sure my relative seniority is the same, but I just got pushed back 300 numbers on my airplane to someone hired after me.

I know this is extreme but you should see my point.

 

[79%N1]

Exactly! Relative seniority is a farce! So what I'm in the same percentage! If 300 guys who were hired into this industry 2-3 years after me, and have 2-3 years less invested at this company than me can now bid ahead of me for aircraft, bases and vacation then that is nowhere close to the neighborhood of fair! Sorry. Relative percentage means NOTHING!

 

[sunlitpath]

Relative seniority is a scam. We are both ALPA carriers. Date of Hire is perfectly fair and reasonable as a foundation for integration.

 

[BOX OFFICE]

Relative seniority only works if you have similar bases, equipment, and career expectations. That works well at a mainline carrier, but not so much at a regional. DOH with fences may be the "fairest" way to go. And I have no dog in this fight.

 

[Whydoitry]

Ok
For example, let's say these 300 pilots who were hired after me all decide to come to ATL and bid my airplane. Just go with this. Sure my relative seniority is the same, but I just got pushed back 300 numbers on my airplane to someone hired after me.

I know this is extreme but you should see my point.

Yes I see your point, but it is very unlikely.Yes you would expect some people to switch bases but that would go both ways. With DOH all those senior ASA pilots might bid IAH, again very unlikely.

Really the whole thing is moot unless we get the SKYW pilots in on this as well.