First, why go back to UAL? No way. Having flown for both a legacy and an extremely well funded private operation, there is no comparison. Sure, there are no guarantees, but my owner is one of the most successful hedge fund managers - at the top of the pyramid if you read the WSJ. We are not talking Bernie Madoff - far from it. You would see him on CNBC frequently. OK, maybe he will go broke someday - oh well. Until then, I am doing very well financially (some of my money is tied up with the owner's funds and my returns have been excellent during this down period) and, just in case, my wife has a stellar job. After my AF career, I could quit flying if I wanted to, but I really enjoy flying the Global worldwide. I actually ENJOY flying - the Global is an awesome aircraft (IMHO) and I fly maybe 30 hours per month on average. The owner is considering placing an order on a Gulfstream 650 position - I would be in favor of that selection. I get great route variety: I was in Southern Europe last week (my wife got to tag along and my kids are grown) and we are going to Maui and the South Pacific in a few weeks. We always stay in 5-star hotels with the owner and we have no real expense account (just nothing too crazy). We do Aspen, the Bahamas and PBI during the winter - the normal stuff you would expect. I am not the Chief Pilot, so, I don't do much administratively - I primarily fly and ensure a safe operation. The owner fully respects us and our flying decisions - we can cancel a flight and never have an issue. He is very aviation savvy and he appreciates our role. For the most part I know my schedules but there are some pop-up trips. So, after all that, why would I want to return to UAL? Especially with the impending merger integration mess? No thanks.
How can my AF buddies compare SWA to regionals? Well, one commutes on regionals to get to his base. Does that answer your question? Give me a break. Flying PHX-LAX-OAK-SAN-SJC or ALB-BWI-MCO-TPA sounds like regional flying to me - and it sounds boring and tiring. Sure, you can throw a few transcons like SAN-BWI or PHX-RDU into the mix but multiple short-distance hops sounds very regional to me. Regionals like Skywest and Republic and Comair do that type of short-hop flying - right?
If you like your flying, good for you. I am not interested in the "my flying is better than your flying" squabbling. My dad is bigger than your dad. Who cares? This is a tough business and you should enjoy your work if at all possible. I would not like your flying - but that's just me. I like to fly internationally and I like variety. I don't want to fly short hops every day (or most days). I agree that SWA is a great bet for stability and financial security. But not everyone wants to get into that type of flying. Does that answer your questions? If not, we can agree to disagree.