urflyingme?!
Man Among Men
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2004
- Posts
- 1,275
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well after a decade at Skywest I think its funny that you and I have been flying with and talking with two totally different pilot groups. Not all, but surprisingly many of the pilots (especially the constant stream of new guys from 97 to 07) didn’t have even a cursory knowledge of the issues and what was being lost.
Would you argue against the fact a legally binding contract would at least have given the pilot group some rights not present with Sapa? That there would be a better medium to fight the gimmme, takes and erosion laid down by management?
The implication always seems to be that ALPA has some kind of mythical strength and power over management that I just don't see. What did they do for the Midwest pilots? What about pushing for age 65 when the majority of their own group opposed it and now all of our careers are on pause at best? Should I go on?
Cheers,
Scott
This rule can be used in reverse to toss unions. All it will take to decertify is the same majority of voters. This will end up tossing more unions than putting them in place.
Never has there been truer words said, that being said, be careful what you vote for. Wanna see where not having contract will get you? Look at SKYW, I won't list the losses, to many and numerous to list without crying in my beer. Those of us who tried to get a union on board are the victims, to the apathetic losers who parroted the daves and F&H, you are getting exactly what you voted/not voted for. I do notice your pathetic arguments have quieted down a lot.This rule can be used in reverse to toss unions. All it will take to decertify is the same majority of voters. This will end up tossing more unions than putting them in place.
I've always loved hearing that out of a reps mouth.The Skywest pilots would, under ALPA or UPA, have stronger grounds and a far better support system which we could use to sue the company for breech of contract, which I think is what your getting at.
These are ancillary benefits. The primary purpose for ALPA was to ensure decent wages for the pilots....not just the executive officers and Prater's fat ass.Its is a legal buffer between to the company, the FAA and you.
These are ancillary benefits. The primary purpose for ALPA was to ensure decent wages for the pilots....not just the executive officers and Prater's fat ass.
The primary purpose of ALPA was pay. Everything else was/is secondary. Didn't you read Flying the Line?Don't you think that the buffer of which I spoke, included something called the RLA?
This rule can be used in reverse to toss unions. All it will take to decertify is the same majority of voters. This will end up tossing more unions than putting them in place.
The primary purpose of ALPA was pay. Everything else was/is secondary. Didn't you read Flying the Line?
Don't piss on my leg and tell me it's raining. Read Flying the Line and Hopkins spells it out for you. Safety was a byproduct. You need me to quote it for you?Also incorrect. When created, ALPA's primary purpose was protecting its members from getting killed in incredibly unsafe working conditions. Pay was secondary.
Don't piss on my leg and tell me it's raining. Read Flying the Line and Hopkins spells it out for you. Safety was a byproduct. You need me to quote it for you?