Wow. Impressive screw-tightening.MR. FREUND:
.....And if, but only if, the parties
cannot reach agreement in the context
of those very specific standards set
out in that condition and restriction
with the matter coming back to one
member of the panel for resolution in a baseball-style arbitration.
.......
ARBITRATOR EISCHEN: Jeff, just one focused question.
You used the analogy to baseball
arbitration. Are you talking about the
baseball salary arbitration?
MR. FREUND: Yes.
ARBITRATOR EISCHEN: By express
requirement of the parties, no opinion is written or expressed by the arbitrator. It's simply a bare-bones
award. Was that your intent?
MR. FREUND: You would simply pick
one set of language over the other. To
be honest with you, we had not thought
about whether an opinion should or
shouldn't be written. We didn't focus on that.
The point I was simply trying to
make is that the arbitrators should
pick one side's language or the other
side.
ARBITRATOR EISCHEN: I don't want
to fine tune this too much but I
wondered if you literally intended no
opinion?
Yawn...