DALPA Conflict of Interest

[PuffDriver]

This from the guy who accused me of childish posting?? :laugh:

Your 15 minutes are over, you have been discredited.

Sorry.

 

[PuffDriver]

What is with you not getting private messages?

I didn't know that I couldn't. Should be able to now.

 

[ACL65PILOT]

Nope it will not let me send you one. I think you need to put in an e-mail address. It will not allow PM's until you do that.

 

[FDJ2]

FDJ2 has been tentatively identified as a member of DALPA's communications Committee.

Nice try.

Fly4hire, argue the issues and not the individuals.

 

[Fly4hire]

Nice try.

Fly4hire, argue the issues and not the individuals.

It is an issue if you are, or were recently on the DAL Comm Cmte - please just answer the question.

 

[FDJ2]

It is an issue if you are, or were recently on the DAL Comm Cmte - please just answer the question.

Keep on fishing.:laugh:

 

[Sinca3]

FDJ2 has been tentatively identified as a member of DALPA's communications Committee. Much of the rhetoric here (as well as the ALPA National Board) has been an orchestrated spin campaign to manipulate the public status of the NWA pilots and franchise in favor of a DALPA perspective.

Copies of postings on ALPA web boards have appeared in negotiations (and arbitration?) previously.

Is the DALPA Comm Cmte creating their own supposedly anonymous PR and then submitting it as evidence to support their case? If so I would hope any such evidence be deemed inadmissible.

FDJ2, please respond - yes or no - are you a member of DALPA's Comm Cmte?

If so I think it would be appropiate for you to recuse yourself for the remainder of the SLI process.

Please.....the NWA "crew" is about the dirtiest MEC/LEC/Neg. Comm. I have ever seen. What happen to the agreed upon method of arbitrating this list and then the NW lawyers/NC doing the total opposite. Trying to introduce information into the negotiations that was agreed before hand to not be used.
Also what about the leaking of our suggested senority list to the NW pilots. No I'm sure that wasn't meant to stir up the troops!!
Read the transcripts or better yet attend on of the negotiaions. I've read every single page of the first 4 days and the NW "crew" is unprepared, childish, and plays dirty (I wouldn't expect anything less especially from lawyers)

 

[ACL65PILOT]

Let them continue that way. It only helps our case.

 

[Fly4hire]

Keep on fishing.:laugh:

I'll take that as an affirmative.

 

[Superpilot92]

Your 15 minutes are over, you have been discredited.

Sorry.

Yeah ok, thanks for the heads up :laugh:

 

[PHXFLYR]

FDJ2 has been tentatively identified as a member of DALPA's communications Committee. Much of the rhetoric here (as well as the ALPA National Board) has been an orchestrated spin campaign to manipulate the public status of the NWA pilots and franchise in favor of a DALPA perspective.

Copies of postings on ALPA web boards have appeared in negotiations (and arbitration?) previously.

Is the DALPA Comm Cmte creating their own supposedly anonymous PR and then submitting it as evidence to support their case? If so I would hope any such evidence be deemed inadmissible.

FDJ2, please respond - yes or no - are you a member of DALPA's Comm Cmte?

If so I think it would be appropiate for you to recuse yourself for the remainder of the SLI process.

Are you a Northwest guy who's asking him to recuse himself if,indeed he is who you claim him to be ?


PHXFLYR

 

[FDJ2]

I'll take that as an affirmative.

You can leap to any conclusions you want if it makes you happy.

 

[PuffDriver]

You can leap to any conclusions you want if it makes you happy.

Isn't that funny?

What conflict WOULD it be, even if true, which it isn't?

 

[~~~^~~~]

It is an issue if you are, or were recently on the DAL Comm Cmte - please just answer the question.

Or if ever read, or talked to, people on the committee.... silly. Frankly NWA has certainly been the source of most of the leaks that have informed many of us.

By the way, what's Occam?

You take this board way too seriously if you think anything here effects the outcome of SLI. Events are already history by the time you, or I, know what is happening.

The DAL side took the high road in not wanting these hearings made public. As hard as it would be for us to be in the dark, it would have been better for our cohesiveness in the long run.

 

[DTW320]

The DAL side took the high road in not wanting these hearings made public.

After seeing your proposed list I see why DALPA didn't want it made public.