It is an issue if you are, or were recently on the DAL Comm Cmte - please just answer the question.
Keep on fishing.:laugh:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is an issue if you are, or were recently on the DAL Comm Cmte - please just answer the question.
Please.....the NWA "crew" is about the dirtiest MEC/LEC/Neg. Comm. I have ever seen. What happen to the agreed upon method of arbitrating this list and then the NW lawyers/NC doing the total opposite. Trying to introduce information into the negotiations that was agreed before hand to not be used.FDJ2 has been tentatively identified as a member of DALPA's communications Committee. Much of the rhetoric here (as well as the ALPA National Board) has been an orchestrated spin campaign to manipulate the public status of the NWA pilots and franchise in favor of a DALPA perspective.
Copies of postings on ALPA web boards have appeared in negotiations (and arbitration?) previously.
Is the DALPA Comm Cmte creating their own supposedly anonymous PR and then submitting it as evidence to support their case? If so I would hope any such evidence be deemed inadmissible.
FDJ2, please respond - yes or no - are you a member of DALPA's Comm Cmte?
If so I think it would be appropiate for you to recuse yourself for the remainder of the SLI process.
Keep on fishing.:laugh:
Your 15 minutes are over, you have been discredited.
Sorry.
FDJ2 has been tentatively identified as a member of DALPA's communications Committee. Much of the rhetoric here (as well as the ALPA National Board) has been an orchestrated spin campaign to manipulate the public status of the NWA pilots and franchise in favor of a DALPA perspective.
Copies of postings on ALPA web boards have appeared in negotiations (and arbitration?) previously.
Is the DALPA Comm Cmte creating their own supposedly anonymous PR and then submitting it as evidence to support their case? If so I would hope any such evidence be deemed inadmissible.
FDJ2, please respond - yes or no - are you a member of DALPA's Comm Cmte?
If so I think it would be appropiate for you to recuse yourself for the remainder of the SLI process.
I'll take that as an affirmative.
You can leap to any conclusions you want if it makes you happy.
Or if ever read, or talked to, people on the committee.... silly. Frankly NWA has certainly been the source of most of the leaks that have informed many of us.It is an issue if you are, or were recently on the DAL Comm Cmte - please just answer the question.
After seeing your proposed list I see why DALPA didn't want it made public.The DAL side took the high road in not wanting these hearings made public.