DAL/NWA SLI Hearings in a nutshell

[Superpilot92]

I agree with you most of the time and like your level-headed points, but here you're back to the old argument again. You guys have been explaining that this is not how the integration is being determined.

Once again, for those not paying attention: new DAL pilots are flying the 767 because more senior guys don't want it. NWA pilots have different values as a group. I was told a few posts ago that it doesn't matter what you "are" holding, DAL's position is what you "could" hold if everyone bid the most senior position available to them. True or not???

If that was the case the last Delta pilot wouldbt be in front of 400 NWA pilots. uke:

 

[General Lee]

I agree with you most of the time and like your level-headed points, but here you're back to the old argument again. You guys have been explaining that this is not how the integration is being determined.

Once again, for those not paying attention: new DAL pilots are flying the 767 because more senior guys don't want it. NWA pilots have different values as a group. I was told a few posts ago that it doesn't matter what you "are" holding, DAL's position is what you "could" hold if everyone bid the most senior position available to them. True or not???

They are flying it mainly because we got 17 757-200ER from AA (all ex TWA birds) quickly, and expanded rapidly. There are plenty of newhires now that are line holders in NYC, and that discounts the theory that all of them are on reserve and hating it. It is probably some of the best flying in the system, but you might have to fly it in NYC, and that, like DTW, may not be liked by some. If you want to blame bad bases, well, you guys have Snowtown, Notown, and Motown.


Bye Bye--General Lee

 

[AirportBum]

Wasn't my point.

My point is a newhire DAL pilot only has "expectations" of flying a 767 because no one senior to him bid that position (or maybe by default as you point out because you needed to staff quickly; either way it has created artificial expectations due to this unique scenario.)

In either case, you guys have been telling me that your proposal uses the "stovepipe" method, so we're just pi$$ing into the wind here.

For what it's worth, I agree with your integration method with the exception of the ~500 staple. The method was designed to put furlough fodder below all DAL pilots. I get it that this is an opener, but the true middle will lie somewhere closer to "stovepiping" all the way down.

DOH won't fly with you guys, and a staple won't with us. Fortunately for everyone, the arbitrators will have to decide where the middle is.

(Standing by for the same old rhetoric about the -9's and -200's ALL going away, and how we would be lucky to be Compass pilots by Christmas )

 

[General Lee]

Wasn't my point.

My point is a newhire DAL pilot only has "expectations" of flying a 767 because no one senior to him bid that position (or maybe by default as you point out because you needed to staff quickly; either way it has created artificial expectations due to this unique scenario.)

In either case, you guys have been telling me that your proposal uses the "stovepipe" method, so we're just pi$$ing into the wind here.

For what it's worth, I agree with your integration method with the exception of the ~500 staple. The method was designed to put furlough fodder below all DAL pilots. I get it that this is an opener, but the true middle will lie somewhere closer to "stovepiping" all the way down.

DOH won't fly with you guys, but a staple won't with us.

(Standing by for the same old rhetoric about the -9's and -200's ALL going away, and how we would be lucky to Compass pilots by Christmas )

I can understand that, but it is what it is. If there are any future airplane parkings (and we KNOW that the 742s and some of the DC9s are going away---we do), our guys shouldn't have to take part in that. Those planes were going away regardless. Now, we may get enough planes to cover for those pilots (new 777s etc) that will save them, but if we did not, those pilots had career expectations of being temporarily furloughed, and that has to be addressed. None of our pilots should lose a job due to one of your planes going bye bye. Sad, but true. If those planes were leaving in 5 years, it may not be like that. But, from what I am hearing, some of your planes may be gone fairly soon. Incontrast, we MAY BE getting some MD90s (I keep hearing 25 based in MSP sooner than later), and they would be flown on our side until the certificates are merged, along with new 777s and 737-700s (all arriving sooner than your 787s (you may not get any), as soon as the Boeing strike is resolved). Future expansion is currently one sided, but will benefit us all after the SLI.


Bye Bye--General Lee

 

[ACL65PILOT]

Yes and those airplanes do not have anything replacing them coming to mainline do they?

If the 717's do come I am sure that the issue of furlough will be negated and DC-9 pilots will fly them.

 

[ThisistheDream]

I see some ratio like 7 to 5 for DAL with little more or less in some parts to make a middle ground intergration. Along with that Fences that protect current DAL and NWA pilots in the aircraft they are currently holding so as long that pilot doesnt not bid out of that 767 or A330 they can have it for 20 years or how long they want. The merger with Usair and AWA is a mess since Usair has a very very old pilot group and AWA had a very young group. Plus Usair had over 1000 pilots on furlough with 12 plus years of seniority where 12 yr AWA pilots where captains. Going by DOH would have been more of a staple in that scenario. NWA DAL overall have a better way to merge in a middle ground with a ratio tied to DOH than Usair AWA ever could. Also in the USA today a few days ago it said that with boeing on strike the 787 delivery is being delayed more along with DAL deliveries of 4 777 and some 757/737 for a total of 10 DAL delayed aircraft. So its look like not much growth from either side going into next year

 

[General Lee]

I see some ratio like 7 to 5 for DAL with little more or less in some parts to make a middle ground intergration. Along with that Fences that protect current DAL and NWA pilots in the aircraft they are currently holding so as long that pilot doesnt not bid out of that 767 or A330 they can have it for 20 years or how long they want. The merger with Usair and AWA is a mess since Usair has a very very old pilot group and AWA had a very young group. Plus Usair had over 1000 pilots on furlough with 12 plus years of seniority where 12 yr AWA pilots where captains. Going by DOH would have been more of a staple in that scenario. NWA DAL overall have a better way to merge in a middle ground with a ratio tied to DOH than Usair AWA ever could.

There are other things you have to consider, like current pay, number of widebodies, future orders, and career expectations with regard to the DC9s and 742s. Sorry, DOH has nothing to do with this, and the USAir East guys learned that quick. Our list was relative seniority along with protection for our junior guys if the 742s and some DC9s were parked (sounds very plausible)---hence the bottom 400 all NWA. It would NOT be fair for any of our people to be furloughed thanks to NWA planes going away. And even if we have nobody furloughed, the list should still reflect that possibility. The Nicelau award had the top 500 all USAir East because of a certain type of flying that was "different" to AWA's, and the bottom 400 here reflect the possibility of a furlough.(very very good chance the cargo ops plus the 742s are bye bye soon)


Bye Bye--General Lee

 

[ACL65PILOT]

I agree, but we will not have to leave it up to the arbitrator.
The want a bump they may get it.

 

[Cobraair75drvr]

Don't you know that only the nwa 787s will be affected by the strike, not any of the aircraft delta has on order. Oh, don't forget all the md90s and 717s that they are getting.

I see some ratio like 7 to 5 for DAL with little more or less in some parts to make a middle ground intergration. Along with that Fences that protect current DAL and NWA pilots in the aircraft they are currently holding so as long that pilot doesnt not bid out of that 767 or A330 they can have it for 20 years or how long they want. The merger with Usair and AWA is a mess since Usair has a very very old pilot group and AWA had a very young group. Plus Usair had over 1000 pilots on furlough with 12 plus years of seniority where 12 yr AWA pilots where captains. Going by DOH would have been more of a staple in that scenario. NWA DAL overall have a better way to merge in a middle ground with a ratio tied to DOH than Usair AWA ever could. Also in the USA today a few days ago it said that with boeing on strike the 787 delivery is being delayed more along with DAL deliveries of 4 777 and some 757/737 for a total of 10 DAL delayed aircraft. So its look like not much growth from either side going into next year

 

[Cobraair75drvr]

What exactly do you mean? Did not look at all areas of dalpas proposed sli closely except for mine. Doh I am roughly 6800, straigh percentage 7300(500 with dohs junior to me now senior) and dalpas stovepipe about 7800(almost 1100 junior, now senior). Out of my hands.

I agree, but we will not have to leave it up to the arbitrator.
The want a bump they may get it.