(I guess this thread's not going to die just yet...)
Both parties had the idea that the other party was going to back out of the deal. Your NJASAP is not as innocent as you think.
We had people watching because we were concerned that
IBT--not 1108--was going to try to screw up this deal. Which is
exactly what they attempted to do.
The IBT had reason to act the way they did and have the two falsely accused pilots move...
They aren't falsely accused --
they were in the bank, holding the falsified paperwork. They were willing accomplices to a
crime. Misdirected by Bill Moore? Very likely. Didn't know it was a crime? Again, very likely. But ignorance of the law isn't an excuse; they were still accomplices.
...to protect the agreed money that was supposed to stay for the IBT- AS AGREED. As of now, all parties have thier agreed upon money.
They have their money because we stopped the illegal transaction in its tracks.
Do you see any threads of the IBT or FLOPS pilots making accusations against the NJASAP or Netjets pilot- NO! Nobody was trying to steal anything.
Are you kidding? There are accusations in this very thread suggesting that very thing. We weren't the ones who let Bill Moore in the back door, and handed over a checking belonging to 1108 in a darkened office, without the knowledge or consent of the leadership in charge that day.
You can say that all day if you wish. It was jsut a matter of taking CONTROL of the funds to protect it and somebody at NJASAP got upset over that and made an accusation.
The changeover was scheduled to take place on July 11th. Sneaking money out the back door, in a darkened office, with someone that our own security had been instructed not to let in the building, and then running to the bank with illegitimate paperwork, is collusion.
By the way, you really think two people in a very public forum will be so stupid to think they could get away with stealing money in their own names. Get real!
I didn't until they were seen trying to do exactly that.
What they did was improper, and illegal. As has been explained repeatedly, Hoffa
does not have the legal authority to declare the local in trusteeship.
(Yeah, options_slave, I know: "Says you." Says the RLA, too.)
This accusation (no due process what-so-ever) was very irresponsible.
What's irresponsible is trusting Bill Moore with your local.
You have your money, so please leave us alone...
We tried to leave you alone. You swiped our checkbook while we were packing up, and gave us the finger, saying we were going to steal from you if you
didn't do that! It was--and is--preposterous and insulting. You took a thug's word over a fellow pilot's. That's the really sad part.
...so we can get on with what we richly deserve- an industry standard contract- and my job back.
I genuinely hope you get it. The real tragedy here is that because IBT was given trusteeship if your local, your leadership
does not have control anymore, and that's only going to hurt your progress and delay things further. Your pilot group has been robbed of its autonomy. I hope you can get out of trusteeship quickly; I mean that.