Options_SLAVE
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2007
- Posts
- 192
Why did the names on the accounts have to be changed on Monday when the leadership was not transfered until Friday?
That's a question to ask the IBT National office. From what I was told, it was their decision.
Why were the elected offficials of the 1108, their term ended on Friday, not told the names were being changed on Monday?
Perhaps to keep unwarranted transactions from happening. If I were the CEO of a company and I knew the accountant at an affiliate company I owned who had access to all of my money was leaving soon, as a SAFETY PRECAUTION I would have the accountant's name removed from the account before the accountant left, "just in case". I can't speak for Hoffa, but perhaps he felt the same way. It was his decision, you'd have to ask him.
Perhaps a better question is, what would the people who did not any longer have access to those funds would have done with that money on Thursday that they are so upset about that they didn't get to do? They are only entitled to the monies outlined in section B.1 and 3 of the agreement, and I do not think the IBT will deny it. They will get that money. So again. WHAT IS THE PROBLEM?