NWA/DAL negotiations update

[nwaredtail]

The structure of every arbitration award I can reference is relative seniority by equipment. Isn't that what your own group did to Republic, for 20 years?

examples?

and no, the Roberts award wasn't anything like relative seniority by equipment

 

[~~~^~~~]

examples?

and no, the Roberts award wasn't anything like relative seniority by equipment

I'm all ears. What seniority did they get? Could they bid NWA's equipment? I'm no Robert's expert and would like to know more about how NWA's been doing things.

Find me a dynamic seniority example and I'll play. Since I'm a gentleman, I'll go first, Tigers/FedEx. Your turn....

 

[~~~^~~~]

... do you believe, you as a 2007 hire at DAL, should be in front of 2001 hires at NWA?

I do not know. It depends on that pilot's relative seniority.

Why should I take a relative seniority hit, when I'm on a bigger aircraft and we are awarding new positions while NWA is having displacements?

How big a cut should I take from status quo? What would you consider "fair" to take away from me? Be specific. It is an earnest question.

How about the DAL 2001 hire(s) holding MD88 CA, JFK? Where would you put them?

If it is something I can't live with, then I will not spend the rest of my life being bitter. I'll find another opportunity. Hopefully they'll offer voluntary LOA's rather than displacements.

It is tough to figure this out near the bottom of the list and the windfalls and losses are enormous in current take home pay. Almost universally the NWA guys are getting more pay and better choices.

I do not claim to have all the answers, but relative seniority is the most logical solution that I've heard (even though I still lose a lot under Relative Seniority)

 

[nwaredtail]

I'm all ears. What seniority did they get? Could they bid NWA's equipment? I'm no Robert's expert and would like to know more about how NWA's been doing things.

Find me a dynamic seniority example and I'll play. Since I'm a gentleman, I'll go first, Tigers/FedEx. Your turn....

No, no hotshot. Specific examples. Show me the nuts and bolts of it.

Waiting....

 

[clippyrip]

Why should I take a relative seniority hit, when I'm on a bigger aircraft and we are awarding new positions while NWA is having displacements?

OK, by your rationale, since I am a new hire and on the 747-200, which is premium widebody, then I will be placed ahead of 80% of the delta pilots. That will also apply to all the displacements as well.

On the other end of the spectrum, there are many pilots who bid lifestyle and are in lower AC than they can hold. Should they be punished because they they chose a smaller AC?

No, exactly.

 

[~~~^~~~]

No, no hotshot. Specific examples. Show me the nuts and bolts of it.

Waiting....

no - Your turn... find a dynamic example. I provided you with a relative example.

Set the standard you expect me to follow and I'll play.

 

[FDJ2]

I'm all ears. What seniority did they get? Could they bid NWA's equipment? ..

The Roberts award was DOH with conditions and restrictions. It's resulted in many NWA pilots being out of seniority in their seats.

It is worth mentioning that at the time of the Roberts awards ALPA merger policy specified DOH with conditions and restrictions in order to maintain current status, pay, career expectations, prevent windfalls etc.

The language has changed since then and the goal of maintaining DOH was dropped. Now the merger policy seeks to maintain premerger status, pay, career expectations, no windfalls etc. through establishment of a seniority list, not conditions and restrictions. DOH is no longer a part of ALPA merger policy, except for those who like to negotiate and arbitrate in the rear view mirror. ALPA merger policy favors, as Nicolau interpretted it, ratios by comparable equipment positions brought to the merger.

 

[FDJ2]

Double post

 

[FDJ2]

OK, by your rationale, since I am a new hire and on the 747-200, which is premium widebody, then I will be placed ahead of 80% of the delta pilots. That will also apply to all the displacements as well.

On the other end of the spectrum, there are many pilots who bid lifestyle and are in lower AC than they can hold. Should they be punished because they they chose a smaller AC?

No, exactly.

You wont be slotted by what you choose to hold, you'll probably be slotted by the equity value of the positions brought to the merger. Your list wont be reordered because one pilot chooses a junior piece of equipment and another chooses a senior piece of equipment.

As an example, not real numbers, DAL has 200 777 CA positions, NWA has 300 747 CA positions, the first 500 positions would be slotted 1.5-1 NWA-DAL and it would work its way down from there. The slotting might also take into account first officer positions.

For example, Nicolau awarded the top 517 positions to AAA (in its second bankruptcy at the time of the merger) because AAA brought 517 wide bodied captain and first officer positions that AWA didn't. He then worked his way down the list based on comparable equipment.

What do you hold on the 747, CA? F/O?, FE? What does it pay? Does an FE seat on the 747 classic have more value than a F/O seat on a 767ER for your years of service?

 

[PuffDriver]

OK, by your rationale, since I am a new hire and on the 747-200, which is premium widebody, then I will be placed ahead of 80% of the delta pilots. That will also apply to all the displacements as well.

On the other end of the spectrum, there are many pilots who bid lifestyle and are in lower AC than they can hold. Should they be punished because they they chose a smaller AC?

No, exactly.

He he, 747 FE "premium" flying. You guys are getting your keesters handed to you here and on the national forum.

 

[nwaredtail]

He he, 747 FE "premium" flying. You guys are getting your keesters handed to you here and on the national forum.

Hey, Scabboy is back. Considering 80% of your "widebody" flying is paid the same as 757, I wouldn't make fun of the word premium.

 

[Cobraair75drvr]

12 year s/o 102+intl ovrd = 73ng and more than md80. If we are such an albatross, then why is moak and the gang raising hell to stop this? You know why, you need us as we need you. If this was not the case then why are y'all not doing the keep delta my delta thing again? If you are so sure about deltas stand alone future then man up and block this thing. Otherwise be honest and admit that both mecs are doing there best (jtfs, veritas, media leaks, talking points etc) to represent thier pilots. You have to give both mecs credit for trying to protect the entire list, not just the sr. At some point we will have to work together.

He he, 747 FE "premium" flying. You guys are getting your keesters handed to you here and on the national forum.

 

[General Lee]

Hey, Scabboy is back. Considering 80% of your "widebody" flying is paid the same as 757, I wouldn't make fun of the word premium.

You still don't get it. When we did the 777 pay rates in 2000, we brought the 757 rates UP to the 767 rates. True fact. LOA 19 also brings the 737-700 rates up to the 738 rates. Thanks for playing... And, you shouldn't be comparing our rates to yours---yours are an embarrassment. But hey, your senior guys get a pension.......


Bye Bye--General Lee

 

[michael707767]

Hey, Scabboy is back. Considering 80% of your "widebody" flying is paid the same as 757, I wouldn't make fun of the word premium.

hmm, since our 757 pays the same as your A330, seems to me it is fairly premium.

 

[michael707767]

He he, 747 FE "premium" flying.

Premium flying?? Premium plumbing.