~~~^~~~
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2001
- Posts
- 6,137
Yes and let me add a tidbit that just came together in some data (that one of the smarter folks I know sent me, I can't take credit for his work).It's about the efficient use of the fleets, people and routes. That's where the money is and that's why we'll get a joint contract.
NWA's fleet utilization is much lower than Delta's. Comparing Apples to Apples, DL's 757 operate on average 13.2 block per day. NWA's number is 9.7. DL's MD88's go 11.1 while the average DC9 is less than 7.5.
I've wondered how Delta parked so many jets and still kept block hours. The answer was hugely increased utilization - apparently a factor in efficiency that remains untapped at NWA. If my read on this data is correct, no wonder the NWA fleet could take a whack job on the -9's and still need more pilots to fly 30% more block hours on the rest of the fleet.
I do not know that a SLI is necessary to get the short term gain on NWA's fleet. This looks like a scheduling and market issue more than whether Occam can teach me to fly an airplane. But, Occam may have Superpilot 92 in a class real soon.
Delta's 777's and 737 orders make good sense. Looking at the numbers they make even better sense to backfill some of NWA's jets that have uncompetitive performance (the 742's, DC9-30's and 40's). By delaying a SLI, the NWA MEC is playing a game of Chicken. They surely have the numbers and have to know what CASM of 11.1 cents per mile mean in a market of similar aircraft with costs in the 5.5 CASM range means.
In balance, the blue skies on the horizon for NWA are found in the relatively low utilization numbers on NWA's 757-200's and A319/320s.
P.S. The 757-300 is the most efficient jet in the fleet and it is a NWA jet. Wonder if we could find more 757's anywhere
Last edited: