Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Usapa Vote

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
What’s left of your USAir career is worth more than what ALPA did or didn't do for you in the past.

You don't owe ALPA anything.

ALPA was bought and paid for with your percentage of salary paid to them and u don't owe them anything.

What’s left of your USAir career is worth more to you by voting ALPA out now....

....than anything ALPA can do for you in the future.

Loyalty to ALPA is worthless after what they didn't do for you in seniority integration and letting management gut your retirement.

The only way to be able to put food on the table decently in retirement concurrent with what your seniority is supposed to be at USAir is to vote out ALPA now to at least get your seniority put back where it should be.

There is nothing that ALPA could ever do for you now that would equal voting ALPA out and subsequently getting your seniority back.

The self serving AWest pilots are not worth the paper their license used to be printed on that they didn't put the seniority proper on their own recognizance as men of morals and principle they are not, evidenced by their sitting there and accepting the ill gained spoils of war not due to them by their years in service based on Date of Hire.

You tacked this garbage onto two threads and then made a new one out of it? You're even sadder than I thought. I'm pretty sure your company offers some sort of counseling. You might seriously consider it before you implode.
 
What’s left of your USAir career is worth more than what ALPA did or didn't do for you in the past.

You don't owe ALPA anything.

ALPA was bought and paid for with your percentage of salary paid to them and u don't owe them anything.

What’s left of your USAir career is worth more to you by voting ALPA out now....

....than anything ALPA can do for you in the future.

Loyalty to ALPA is worthless after what they didn't do for you in seniority integration and letting management gut your retirement.

The only way to be able to put food on the table decently in retirement concurrent with what your seniority is supposed to be at USAir is to vote out ALPA now to at least get your seniority put back where it should be.

There is nothing that ALPA could ever do for you now that would equal voting ALPA out and subsequently getting your seniority back.

The self serving AWest pilots are not worth the paper their license used to be printed on that they didn't put the seniority proper on their own recognizance as men of morals and principle they are not, evidenced by their sitting there and accepting the ill gained spoils of war not due to them by their years in service based on Date of Hire.

Saturday night live started early today and already we have dumb as$es making comments! Somewhere in the world their is a village missing it's idiot someone tell them hmmm is ready to come home:rolleyes:

WD.
 
Not trying to stir the pot Whiskey but Im looking at todays mailings and they each have .33 in the postage section. Just like all the others. Presorted First Class from Chelverly MD to PA US Postage .334. Wish I had a scanner to show the ugly truth.
 
Last edited:
Not trying to stir the pot Whiskey but Im looking at todays mailings and they each have .33 in the postage section. Just like all the others. Presorted First Class from Chelverly MD to PA US Postage .334. Wish I had a scanner to show the ugly truth.

I'm sure that this means something to someone however all it shows is that alpa has resources and usapa doesn't.

Not that they want to contact me but I have yet to see a single piece of usapa mail, I wonder why:rolleyes:

WD
 
I have been an ALPA member in good standing for over 20 years. It has not gone unoticed that we have lost 3 ALPA airlines in the last several weeks. I would like to see this money being used to help fellow ALPA members who have found themselves jobless overnight. That's what a Union is about. Not running propaganda wars.
 
Resources don't mean diddley compared to the loss or personal resources due to loss of seniority.

Ever notice the class evident in people not predisposed to name calling.

Oh by the way, if you look at the time stamps the self standing post was made first.
 
Lets not forget the guys who haven't been ALPA members for years....and are still getting this barrage of mail on a daily basis.
 
I have been an ALPA member in good standing for over 20 years. It has not gone unoticed that we have lost 3 ALPA airlines in the last several weeks. I would like to see this money being used to help fellow ALPA members who have found themselves jobless overnight. That's what a Union is about. Not running propaganda wars.

Good point!! Then may I suggest that you and Bradford stop causing the wasting of "resources" on a completely useless effort to overturn an arbitration that you agreed too. Just a thought.

WD
 
Resources don't mean diddley compared to the loss or personal resources due to loss of seniority.

Ever notice the class evident in people not predisposed to name calling.

Oh by the way, if you look at the time stamps the self standing post was made first.

I'm sorry but you make no sense at all. What seniority?? A person on the bottom of the east list had no seniority because if he did then he would not be at the bottom now would he?

You seem to be under that spell of not knowing the difference between seniority and longevity. Big diffrerence Hmmm really big difference!! Learn that and you may have a chance of true understanding.

WD.
 
Why don't you explain it. WD

All I see is DOH and have gone through two integrations that way before and nobody had a problem that way.

I don't work there but someone very significant to me does. Thats the way I feel and so do they. I appreciate your opposing point of view. But don't agree.
 
I realize telling you this is like telling a spoiled 4 year old he can't have candy at the checkout line. You just hope if your mommy won't give you everything, maybe she'll just give you one or two things to shut you up and you still come out ahead. Bad news: I don't think anyone is planning on giving into your tantrum. But hey, good luck with that approach.:rolleyes:

Bwaaahhhh!
 
Why don't you explain it. WD

All I see is DOH and have gone through two integrations that way before and nobody had a problem that way.

I don't work there but someone very significant to me does. Thats the way I feel and so do they. I appreciate your opposing point of view. But don't agree.

You may not agree and that too is just fine however fact is fact. The east was a failure over 33% of the pilot group furloughed with NO epectation of returning. Fact, the east knew and agreed to arbitration. Fact, they picked the arbitrator. Fact, they picked their neutral. Fact they had no problems with merger policy PRIOR to going.

Now they had their day before the man made their case and now its been over for almost a year. The east is by far the worst group of pilots on the planet. Talk about mesa,VA and skybus all you want but its the east and their B.S. that's the worst. They have been, are and will continue to be their own worst enemy!!!

Last guy on the list in the east was a res bus f/o now as a result of AWA and this foul abortion of a merger he feels he should be placed in a left seat. Staple job? Not here bro I will give it to usapa they have done what the mec here couldn't and that's wake the west up!! Its going to be a blood bath and the employees will no doubt pay the price. Thinking with emotion without the benefit of intellect, nothing new to the east. Tell you friend to get that resume ready, we have!!

WD.
 
"Last week the U.S. District judge in New York dismissed the MDA lawsuit that was filed in 2005 over the terms and conditions of employment of the MDA pilots. The lawsuit contained several claims; the Court dismissed most of them because they were time barred..."

Wait a minute. The first sentence says the suit was dismissed. The second sentence says it dismissed "most of the claims." Which is it?


ALPA argued that the case didn't have merit based on the SoL, ironically, not on whether or not they failed in DFR! Think about the moral and ethical outcome of that! The judge dutifully ruled the 6 complaints had merit but they legally fell outside the SoL's time lines. Score for ALPA...kinda...because of the SoL.

But, don't miss what she did say: She also allowed the ammended complaint over the Seniority List used in the Nic Arbitration because in her words: "The alleged breach is not about the process or terms of the arbitration award . . . but that the union knew of, and stipulated to, the introduction of an erroneous, previously-corrected seniority list during the arbitration proceedings. To this allegation, defendants have not offered any reason to deny plaintiffs leave...."

That is significant. She get's it. She understands the plaintiff's perspective.

Also,

"...plaintiff have adequately alleged that their injuries were caused by the defendants' knowing stipulation to introduce an erroneous seniority list that they knew would adversely affect the careers and employment rights of their represented members. Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a supplemental complaint is therefore granted."

Simply put, she tossed out the 6 complaints over the SoL technicality and is allowing the case to be ammended and proceed to trial based on the merits of the plantiff's supplemental arguments. ALPA says that is not a "ruling" by the Judge. While she may not have "ruled" the ALPA failed in DFR, she certainly has ruled the plaintiff's arguments have merit and deserve to be heard. That is also significant. The case moves on as an ammended supplementary case. Had ALPA won it's motion to dismiss, this case would be dead in the water. They didn't. It's not. Discovery is underway.

One more item. ALPA has published that they have not offered a settlement figure to the MDA pilots.

You're really unfamiliar with the way civil procedure works, aren't you?

You might try a perusal of a Hornbook on procedure.

It might alert you to the fact that much of what is quoted above is complete fantasy, especially concerning any judgment or validation of the "merits" of the case.

Your suit has been allowed to proceed in the process, nothing more.
 
The self serving AWest pilots are not worth the paper their license used to be printed on that they didn't put the seniority proper on their own recognizance as men of morals and principle they are not, evidenced by their sitting there and accepting the ill gained spoils of war not due to them by their years in service based on Date of Hire.

The HP pilots didn't ask for management to merge with another airline. Why should they roll over and take it? There is a difference between seniority and longevity. Just because US had been around longer doesn't make those pilots more senior. Wherever each side was at before the merger should be where you're at post integration. The Nic award was about as good as you're going to get IMO.
 
Do the AAA pilots have any responsibility in how they engaged in ALPA?

usapa followers are being scammed by attornies who are promising what they can't deliver. (The Nic award is BINDING Arbitration- it'll stay after your due process is allowed.) But i'm sure they'll bill for the hours worked on the undeliverable.

Caspian27- that's really well said. Thank you.
 
If ALPA had a "merger" policy that would help...dont you think. I know they say they do....but then your group has to pay lawyers to fight their group. A union merger policy should be just that a policy and there should be no question on how a merger integration will work...end of story.
 
Dooork,

As yo seem to have it all figured out and it's just that simple.

Discribe a merger policy that would be fair 100% of the time? Remember I said FAIR!

Fast
 
the fairest way is with an office product sold throughout the world under such brand names as Swingline and Bostich. Whoever is the acquirer uses it to add the acquiree to their list. Problem solved
 

Latest resources

Back
Top