Complete and total BS! I am forced to fork over these dues because if I don't then I can be terminated. If ALPA actually had to rely on people voluntarily paying their dues based on a level of perceived value they get in return, the union would go broke in no time.
Who is forcing you to fork over dues? Is this coercsion? Blackmail? How did you get into this situation? Where you kidnapped?
The problem that no matter how lousy, back stabbing, politically correct, palm greasing good old boys club ALPA is, nothing will change. In the end, no matter what, they get their money. They have no reason to change.
And what about all those ALPA members that keep NOT electing them. Who are these pilots that don't vote and keep letting these back stabbers back in!
I agree. There are a lot if grumblings at CAL to replace ALPA and go back independent after this contract. I can assure you I will be very happy to see that happen right now. I'm sick of seeing my dues go into the toilet and for National officer and admin. salaries.
It is a complete and total disgrace.
Do you think you dues value will increase, remain or decrease if you go back to Indy CAL?
How many ALPA Nat'l Officer salaries does your dues mony pay? (not to put you on the spot... but do you know?)
How is your dues money going in the toilet? In what way?
Hold on pal! You said, and I paraphrase only slightly: "ALPA gets to do what they want on cabotage, because only 100 pilots showed up in Washington". There are a lot of pilots getting involved in committees, and interaction with the union is improving. (inc. yours truly. I'm on standby for 1 committee and applying to another) What I'm saying is: To insist personal appearance in large numbers is the single determinate as to what ALPA gets to do with policy is BS!! If you're on reserve or in the bottom of the list at CAL, being able to get to a meeting is a total crapshoot. That doesn't mean ALPA gets to ignore the membership and make stuff up.
Did Ghandi walk to the seasalts with five people? Did MLKjr speak in Wash DC with a few folks? You may snicker at my using Ghandi and MLKjr, however, it seems to be that ALPA members seem to want action that is of Ghandi/MLKjr caliber..... no?
I don't know what you're trying to accomplish, do you?? I've asked you before: what would be an adequate percentage of participation? Sure, as close to 100% as possible would be great, but not realistic. Do you have a goal in mind here, or are you attempting to set an expectation that no matter the turnout, the number is inadequate, and ALPA will do as they wish?? Who's side are you on??
Let's look at these numbers:
- LEC attendence 5%.
- LEC election 35%
- ALPA-PAC 16%
- Age 60 Survey 39%
I'd say an increase of
LEC attendance 5 to 20% is fair. Still a minority but lets take baby steps.
LEC election... a majority would be nice. How about 50%+1 as a start. Reasonable? (it takes 90 seconds to do internet polling.)
ALPA-PAC.... let's be real here... how about 30%. That is still 1/3... but a double increase...
Age 60 survey... well that ship has sailed... but I am sure another survey will come along... but what do you thing the particaption rate should have been for the age 60 survey?
It all comes down to unity, consensus, particaption and political action. Grassroots movements is what gets the attention of managment and gov't.
We can demand leadership action all day long, but for some reason when our leader(s) draws his/her sword, climbs out of the foxhole and yells charge, the membership doesn't seem too interested..... until that changes we will cavitate.