Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Skyboss said:Short term yes, O&D demand isn't there to warrant it long term which is all that your company serves. I know you think your airline is what is great in the world, but I'd rather see choice of more cities through connecting at DFW than just a choice to Dallas. I know they don't teach you that at Southwest University, but that's what the rest of the planet is here to point out to you and your fellow peanut tossers.
aa73 said:Nope, I'm sure as heck not. Having spent five years growing up in STL and having many friends that flew for TWA, I always saw both sides of the story. Those quotes were made by the APA leadership that set up the deal, not the rank and file. Most of the rank and file felt helpless towards the whole deal, since there was nothing we could do about it. Your pilot group is/was a class act, and I'm not alone in saying that here in "Sky Nazi Land."
NAA Pilot said:Then why did you make this wise as$ comment?
Originally Posted by aa73
Gee, you're not ex TWA, are you?
aa73 said:For the same reason some of your guys "rattle our cages" a little when we show some AA-bred bitteness... it's gotta go both ways right?
:beer:
NAA Pilot said:Maybe you should try taking the higher road.
And, drop the cheers thing.
NAA Pilot said:January 6th - 13th Round trip
LUV; DAL - MCI 182.60
AMR: DFW - MCI 158.40
The Prussian said:and your point is.......
All I see here is a legacy carrier doing exactly what they are very good at doing--chopping fares to below cost, to preserve market share at all cost.
Allowing market losses on one or two routes, and subsidizing those losses across the rest of their system...not exactly a new concept nor totally unexpected....
T P