Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

WN to ground 190 flights

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Sounds like a wonderful pilot group.

For the most part it is. However, we do have quite a few people on property who live way, way beyond their means. Capts who live paycheck to paycheck on 22K a month! Thats right 22K a month! Some FO's are bad too, with 350-400K houses, two car payments, kids in private schools, wife doesn't work, etc....... You think these folks are going to vote for their line to be reduced?

We got some folks around here that are in for a big dose of reality.
 
For the most part it is. However, we do have quite a few people on property who live way, way beyond their means. Capts who live paycheck to paycheck on 22K a month! Thats right 22K a month! Some FO's are bad too, with 350-400K houses, two car payments, kids in private schools, wife doesn't work, etc....... You think these folks are going to vote for their line to be reduced?

We got some folks around here that are in for a big dose of reality.

I don't see them giving up anything. You'll see guys on furlough and pilots picking up tons of over time in the process.
 
Flop,
Unfortunately an article in yesterday's Dallas morning rag. Said that SWA is reducing fares and that the others were going to have to match. SWA's schedule and fare structure just came out.

Yeah well, it might be a long time down the road, but I think we'll all see this low fares stuff was a mistake. You better hope we're all never paying the same for fuel. It isn't going to be an equal opposite type thing.
 
I don't see them giving up anything. You'll see guys on furlough and pilots picking up tons of over time in the process.

Won't be much overtime. But yes, the same guys that whore it out right now would pick up as much VJA, DOT, EF as they could even if guys were forloughed. That 1.7 mil house is expensive.:laugh:

Anyway, this is a lot talk with nothing concrete yet. nobody knows sh!t right now so lets leave it at that.
 
Hey I was agreeing with you on the lower fares.:smash: You mentioned you hoped they would raise fares and that article just came out the other day. But lets talk about fuel hedging yet once again.:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
I didn't know it was possible to make whine out of sour grapes but AA you have proven me wrong
 
Wow, someone's true character comes out when they feel criticized. Every other airline has been hammered on this message board and in many of those cases, rightfully so. Now here we have negative news from Southwest and someone posts a negative comment about them and everybody gets their panties in a bundle and rushes to criticize. He actually has a fact, although not so thoughtfully put, Southwest is starting to be negatively affected. I don't remember Southwest cutting 190 flights due to "winter schedule". The "winter schedule" is not the factor for these cuts, it is the terrible domestic market that has crushed the entire airline industry. All you that slammed him for his post are like the big bully that loves to dish it out but can't take it, especially when it is the truth.

First of all people are responding on here defending SWA just like evryone else has responded defending their own airline. I can point you to many a thread were the AA, CAL and UAL guys defended thier airline during times of hardship. I think the most important point people are forgetting about is that we are not grounding airplanes as a rsult of the cutbacks. we utilize our airplanes so well that i am sure with this "reduction" we could give back alot of airplanes to meet our NEW schedulle yet gues what we are grounding ZERO airplanes, just switching out older ones for the -700.
 
NO airline is safe these days, including SW!! They're just thinking ahead and making the appropriate cuts for the winter sched. Maybe a little more than in the past, but look at the economy and more is probably needed. You make cuts on current conditions, not compared to years past.
 
Tejas Jet,

I’ve been living in Dallas for two decades so I’m very familiar with what’s happening over at LUV and SWAPA.

The problem is LUV became too much of a political powerhouse to overcome (especially in Texas). You had both Hutchison and Cornyn in your back pocket.

We tried to stop you guys from screwing the rest of us, but unfortunately for the rest of us, APA was unsuccessful.

The problem with the action, or in some cases inaction, for Age 65 you all took was the adverse effect it has on the rest of the industry. It was completely short sighted and arrogant on SWAPA’s part. We are only now starting to pay the price.

All I can say to all the guys losing their jobs and moving backwards across our profession – is we tried and keep the faith.

AA767AV8TOR

Don't try to blame Age 65 on the likes of SWAPA or Jetblue. We only just standardized what was already the retirement age for the entire world aviation community. Additionally, it wasn't even a close vote in Congress-- IT WAS UNANIMUS!!!!! in favor of change. Since when did Congress vote for anything in that manner? I guess our Congressmen don't read the USA Today for ads taken out by APA...
 
This thread got real stupid, real fast.

Maybe it's time to delete it.

....that would cause most threads to get deleted.....It would be real quiet here if you deleted all the "stupid".....
 
Don't try to blame Age 65 on the likes of SWAPA or Jetblue. We only just standardized what was already the retirement age for the entire world aviation community. Additionally, it wasn't even a close vote in Congress-- IT WAS UNANIMUS!!!!! in favor of change. Since when did Congress vote for anything in that manner? I guess our Congressmen don't read the USA Today for ads taken out by APA...

You do realize that at the special voting session Prater arrainged this to be brought forward in it was an up or down vote? If one person voted no it would have failed. Translation: This is a less formal voting session where the big spenders can get things snuck by.
 
That's how much they cost in places like MDW, BWI, and OAK and that's for a townhouse in this down market

You must be part of the head in the sand BFE Texas group?

Sure the Bay Area is outrageous but you can get more than a townhome for 350-400K if go an hour outside MDW and BWI. If you want to commute you can live just about anywhere in the 350-400K range.

You must be on of those FO's who can't manage his money right.
 
Last edited:
You must be on of those FO's who can't manage his money right.

Quite the contrary but if you think you can go 60 miles outside those cities and get something that isn't in the hood for less than 350k then you are clearly a Texas head who doesn't get it.

Commuting is stupid.
 
Quite the contrary but if you think you can go 60 miles outside those cities and get something that isn't in the hood for less than 350k then you are clearly a Texas head who doesn't get it.
Sure what ever. I found several homes near MDW and BWI for under 350K that were excellent value and in good neighborhoods.

http://realestate.yahoo.com/Marylan...350122f3d3258b1bb5d72;_ylt=AlGeZyu1RAQ4NDzXmL

http://realestate.yahoo.com/Illinoi...oms=&bathrooms=&type=classified&b=101&ltype=0

Browse thru here.

http://realestate.yahoo.com/Illinoi...us=&bedrooms=&bathrooms=&type=classified&b=21
 
Last edited:
Hey AA...whatever.

May be this is a good time to cut back the schedule a bit, modify the -300's and -700's for RNP upgrades (autothrottles and such) and send the flight crews to sim training for their new equipment.

Seems to the boys in Dallas that a full schedule with a decreased load factor doesn't make sense while pulling crews for training and paying OT.

But what was I thinking, you know everything.
 
1. It will be a long time and a lot of pain before SWA actually furloughs. But is it possible? Ala Delta, YES it is possible. Anyone who claims otherwise is a fool.

2. 190 Flights represent approx 6% of their flight activity, which I believe is 3200-3500 a day. How much revenue does it represent? It also represents costs. Obviously SWA is concerned, you don't cut 190 flights because "things are looking up"

3. 2009 and definitely 2010 will be a "reality check" for SWA as most of their fuel hedges (hedged at prices below $80) will be expired.

4. According to SWA's own people, basically no fleet expansion and possible future expansion to be cancelled. Don't believe me, listen to their own people.

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080826/southwest_cuts.html?.v=3

Southwest spokesman Chris Mainz said Tuesday that some of the eliminated flights, which span Southwest's nationwide network, could be restored later in 2009. Late winter is typically a slow travel period.
"This is a response to a slower traffic period, and we're giving ourselves some operational flexibility in the winter months," he said.
Southwest is better insulated than its rivals from high jet fuel prices because it bought options to get most of its fuel at below-market prices. Still, the airline's fuel bill has been rising, eating into margins at the most consistently profitable U.S. carrier.
Chairman and Chief Executive Gary Kelly said in June that the Dallas-based low-cost carrier hoped to grow modestly in 2009. But he tempered that outlook by saying the expansion plans could be scrapped if oil prices remain high or the economy weakens.
At the time, Kelly said Southwest still planned to add 14 new planes next year. Mainz said Tuesday that new planes will be added while older aircraft are retired, keeping the airline's fleet "relatively flat." Southwest has about 530 jets, all Boeing 737s.
Rough times ahead folks...the Kool-Air might be getting sour...
 
Sounds like, as usual, a lot of people talking out of their a$$es.

And here's one of those southwest skirts now!:laugh: Don't forget to vote yes on the furlough of the junior guys so you don't have to take the average flight hours down.
 
Weren't we supposed to cut back this year?
About twenty classes so far.
We otta make it. If not, this was a good ride too.
 
And here's one of those southwest skirts now!:laugh: Don't forget to vote yes on the furlough of the junior guys so you don't have to take the average flight hours down.

Of course furloughs are possible, but what do you think the odds would be in
Vegas on a SWA furlough seeing how they haven't furloughed a single person, EVER! I'll take my chances with those odds any day, but yes a furlough is always possible.
 
I guess they're due then. I think some of the other folks hit the nail on the head. Are the old senior dudes going to give up trips so a new hire can stay on property? Probably not. They didn't care about those guys when they pushed for 65. Do you think when they start talking furloughs coming up here that the 60+ crowd will volunteer to retire? HA HA HA HA HA.
 
Rough times ahead folks...the Kool-Air might be getting sour...

I say...let's wait and see what actually happens.

Case in point...every year since I've been here, the wailing and knashing of teeth takes place as they tell us from the "head shed" that the 1st Quarter will probably show a loss...

..hasn't happened yet. Not to say it can't ( 4th airline), but not yet.

In addition, this year ( 2008) we were told that we were only going to hire 130-140 pilots...we are now looking at hiring around 500-550.

2 more New Hire classes of 24 each, starting in September.

Big change.

Once it actually happens...then we can talk.
 
Of course furloughs are possible, but what do you think the odds would be in
Vegas on a SWA furlough seeing how they haven't furloughed a single person, EVER! I'll take my chances with those odds any day, but yes a furlough is always possible.

A fool and his money are soon parted.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom