Way2Broke said:I fly freight and I have a SIC (one that pays for time) that shows up in a pilot uniform when we can wear shorts and a t-shirt. What a loser. Anyone else have good stories?
I guess the biggest loser would be ur mom.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Way2Broke said:I fly freight and I have a SIC (one that pays for time) that shows up in a pilot uniform when we can wear shorts and a t-shirt. What a loser. Anyone else have good stories?
ABXbooger said:I was a very junior FO at a large regional back in the day. Overnighting in MSN, which is always a good time. Captain was notorious for being an ultra dork(he wore nomex gloves when flying) so when asked what I was doing for dinner, I said "I am not sure if I am going to dinner, I'll call you if go." Needless to say I was going out, but wasn't going to call. When I went down to leave the hotel for dinner, he was sitting there waiting on me, got up as if we had planned it...I was trapped.
Now the best part................................
He was wearing a powder blue leisure suit, no joke. With white shoes, no joke.
All blue with a blue fabric belt and all. I think it was polyester.
What a dinner, I will never forget.
How about the FO who balanced the fuel on her 727 by dumping?CKJET said:When I first started on the 727 there was an F/O who I am fairley certin was trying to kill us! It would always make for interesting conversations between the crews at the hotel. He eventually made it to #1 F/O on the list and claimed the quality of life issue for not upgrading. He was a real tool.
Lead Sled said:How about the FO who balanced the fuel on her 727 by dumping?
'Sled
No it was a 727 - Western Airlines, in the mid- 80's.G100driver said:I thought that was a DC-10? Good thing for her lawyer, eh?
Lear Wanna Be said:I actually think the gear thing is a pretty good idea! Every year there are several gear up landings at towered airports. How hard is it for the tower to say, "UAL776 check wheels down, cleared to land runway 11." Reply,"Roger, UAL776 cleared to land 11, gear in transit or gear down or holding the gear." Not that airline types are landing unintentional gear ups (except Great Lakes). Military types that have flown PAR approaches know that approach says something to the effect of, "over the final approach fix wheels should be down." Put that in the civilian world shooting an ASR approach, which is out of the norm for most of us. It is real easy to forget the gear. We are creatures of habit.
Maybe it also happened at United - I have no idea. I do know that it happened to a Western 727 crew as well.G100driver said:LOL that is funny. I heard the story about 5 years ago and it was a UA DC-10 and she was Native American ... who got a tribal lawyer to represent her!
He is teaching me to fly the beech 99 from Reno to Winnemucca and we are unpress at 17,500. I go for the O2 mask and he says "God I hate when people use that crap, I don't like smoking around it". I put it away and he graciously offers me a pall mall nonfilter. I shudder to think of the buzz I would have missed out on had I not lit up and gone for the O2 instead.
Bringupthebird said:You only need a multi-engine rating to carry passengers in a twin. Maybe a passenger turned him in.
flap operator said:We have these great productivity breaks at Mesaba for like, 4 hours. The Mall of America is a 10 min train ride away and lots of crews go to the mall for food or the movies or just to get the heck out of the airport. Most don't change... but let it be known here that these folks are at work. They're not there on their day off. We have a few dorks at Mesaba, but I don't think they'd be caught dead in uniform on their day off, where fellow XJers might see them. =)
FO
NYCPilot said:This reminds me of a question a lot of pilots seem to get wrong.
On an ILS if the runway environment is not in sight and a missed approach needs to be executed, are you allowed to go below DH?
Most pilots for some reason say no, thinking that it's the same as an MDA, where you must level off and not descend below it if the runway is not insight.
The correct answer is yes, you may descend below DH on an ILS even if the runway is not in sight. Only of course to get yourself established on the MAP, not to land. Since you are in an established descent flying the needles, you will end up going below DH while arresting the descent and transitioning to a climb attitude.
NYCPilot said:This reminds me of a question a lot of pilots seem to get wrong.
On an ILS if the runway environment is not in sight and a missed approach needs to be executed, are you allowed to go below DH?
Most pilots for some reason say no, thinking that it's the same as an MDA, where you must level off and not descend below it if the runway is not insight.
The correct answer is yes, you may descend below DH on an ILS even if the runway is not in sight. Only of course to get yourself established on the MAP, not to land. Since you are in an established descent flying the needles, you will end up going below DH while arresting the descent and transitioning to a climb attitude.
gkrangers said:Uhhh...I was under the impression that we had to halt the descent and level off at the DH if the runway environment (lights, etc...all that junk) were not in sight...not go below it for any reason...
gkrangers said:Uhhh...I was under the impression that we had to halt the descent and level off at the DH if the runway environment (lights, etc...all that junk) were not in sight...not go below it for any reason...