Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Where's the love??!! Woman Kicked Off SWA Plane for T-Shirt

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
iLR60Mac said:
Please people, take others into consideration when you do, say, or where something. Innocent ears and eyes are there to take it in.

A grown adult should know better.

Thank you for common the common sense quote of the day!

I give SW credit for reacting the way they did. I am sick of the trailer trash society we have become. I could care less about her political views.
(fat pig probably didn't vote anyway)

People have no right to be offensive to others.
South West keeps proving it self to me....

Dave B
 
WatchYourElbows said:
Cool! I wish you all would hurry up and get over there so the rest of us can enjoy our lives again. Thanks for the sacrifice. :cool:

I'd love to hear you say this to my 6"4 234lb Marine Corp nephew over there protecting your sorry chicken S$&t ASS. PM me and I will give you his address and you can tell him what he is doing is not worth it. I am waiting.
 
WatchYourElbows said:
soooo, you decide. Should 2000 of our wonderful, young, productive people DIE or should a president get a bj? Get real! You guys LIVE to get those things. LOL Ask yourself, are you better of now then 2000?

I would answer to that, while a president was getting a BJ (and NOT doing his job) the deaths of 3000 people in NYC were being planned and executed. So maybe you shouldn't go there either.:uzi:

Freedom of speech does NOT give someone the right to use obscene language. I do believe there are laws against THAT. So I would say, not only did SWA do the right thing but that they will probably not have much trouble beating this in court.

Although, this woman does live in CA and if it goes before the 9th Circuit Court it's anyone's guess how it will turn out.:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
What he is doing is honorable. I have no beef with him. I have trouble with the administration that put him in harms way because of a vendetta.
 
Chuck Yogourt said:
I'd love to hear you say this to my 6"4 234lb Marine Corp nephew over there protecting your sorry chicken S$&t ASS. PM me and I will give you his address and you can tell him what he is doing is not worth it. I am waiting.

What your nephew doing is admiral, what you're doing is taking credit for his actions.

I'd like to ask you a question. Your nephew is in west Asia because he was ordered there. What exactly is he protecting me from? Iraquis bombing and killing Iraquis? There are no or have there ever been weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. That was pure speculation in the intellegence community.

Another question, what does this have to do with the thread subject? Take it outside, please.
 
erj-145mech said:
What your nephew doing is admiral, what you're doing is taking credit for his actions.

I'd like to ask you a question. Your nephew is in west Asia because he was ordered there. What exactly is he protecting me from? Iraquis bombing and killing Iraquis? There are no or have there ever been weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. That was pure speculation in the intellegence community.

Another question, what does this have to do with the thread subject? Take it outside, please.

I'm not taking credit for him. I am proud as hell of him. He was ordered there and he wants to finish the job. He knows what is asked of him. He knew that when he signed up.
As far as the WMD's, we know they were there and just because we didn't find them does not mean they did not have them. They used them on their own people. Ask Germany and France where they are.
 
Get it right please...

WatchYourElbows said:
When Clinton lied, no one died.

Ever hear of USS Cole, Kobar towers, US embassy in Kuwait and Kenya, USMTM Building in Riyadh? The list goes on and the man (Clinton) did nada, zip, ziltch.

And to get back on thred, no, she has no case won't win in court, glad we did it.
 
WatchYourElbows said:
When Clinton lied, no one died.

Not really accurate in my eyes. I don't have a problem with Clinton lying, or Getting hummers in the Oval Office. The problem was that while he was chasing interns no one was at the wheel. Huge intelligence and military cutbacks while the chinese were sleeping in the Lincoln Bedroom. Bin Laden offered on a platter, but passed on that one. As far as I am concerened he set the stage for 911, and our current situation. I have yet to see the CNN, or Hollywood version of that story.
 
As far as the WMD's, we know they were there and just because we didn't find them does not mean they did not have them. [/quote]

OK...
 
turbodriver said:
Negative, ghostrider. She will win the lawsuit. The "shirt of no service" phrase does not apply to airlines. We dont have said sign at every gate do we?
If you'd spend a little less time hitting the "Submit Reply" button and a little more time reading, you'd come off sounding less like a fool.

From SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO.

CONTRACT OF CARRIAGE - PASSENGER (SIXTH REVISED)
10. Refusal to Transport (Issued July 12, 2005; Effective July 12, 2005)

Carrier will refuse to transport, or will remove from an aircraft at any point, any passenger in the following circumstances:

F. Comfort and Safety - Carrier may refuse to transport or remove from the aircraft at any point any passenger in the following categories as may be necessary for the comfort or safety of such passenger or other passengers:​
(1) Persons whose conduct is or has been known to be disorderly, abusive, offensive, threatening, intimidating, or violent, or whose clothing is lewd, obscene, or patently offensive;​

NOTE:​

Carrier will not refuse to provide transportation to a qualified individual with a disability solely because the individual’s disability results in appearance or involuntary behavior that may offend, annoy, or inconvenience crew members or other passengers.​





As I read it, the only possible recourse she has is to argue that the wearing of the offensive t-shirt was an involuntary behavior that arose from a disability. Unless laws have changed recently, neither stupidity nor liberalism are disabilities.
:eek:




.




 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom