Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Where's the love??!! Woman Kicked Off SWA Plane for T-Shirt

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
WatchYourElbows said:
soooo, you decide. Should 2000 of our wonderful, young, productive people DIE or should a president get a bj? Get real! You guys LIVE to get those things. LOL Ask yourself, are you better of now then 2000?

Your missing the entire point, if it said Fu$% the Clintons, she would have been asked to leave as well.

You libs are all the same, if it offends you then by all means throw down the house, if it does not offend you, or you aggree with it, then it must be the truth and FU** everyone else, and their rights.
 
WatchYourElbows said:
We are at WAR????? AYFKM????? We started THAT war. We need to be in Afghanistan or at least Saudi Arabia. But Iraq? What will they call this war in history? The Oil War? The Vengence for Daddy War? I swear, you people should wear lil' sheep masks for halloween. Bahhhhh.

I didn't want to join the fracas. But we knew about the Tailban and Al Queda 10 years ago and their intentions in regard to the US. Would we be in a better situation if we took PREVENTIVE action 7 or 8 years ago? What could happen 20 years from now if Saddam was allowed to govern Iraq without any UN sanctions? My opinion is that it would have dwarfed 9-11. Enabling another terrorist foothold in the Middle East is not an option.

Now back to the post. SHE HAS NO CASE WHATSOEVER.
 
Last edited:
No YOU missed the post. This administration has divided this country. If you don't see it, then you aren't paying attention. Regardless of what side any of us is on, this puts us in horrible danger. This country is more divided than I've ever seen it. What about you?
 
WatchYourElbows said:
We are at WAR????? AYFKM????? We started THAT war. We need to be in Afghanistan or at least Saudi Arabia. But Iraq? What will they call this war in history? The Oil War? The Vengence for Daddy War? I swear, you people should wear lil' sheep masks for halloween. Bahhhhh.

Goes to show the low level of your understanding of forign affairs?

WHO DO YOU THINK FUNDED OSAMA??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

"Sound of Crickets"

You are so out of touch with reality.

2000 soldiers is nothing compared to the WW 2. AND GUESS WHAT THE GERMANS DID NOT ATTACK US?????????

FDR led us into that war, and for good reason, and he was a Liberal.

You libs are always on the wrong side of history. History has proven that ove the last 100 years. Wake up, and get an education in history. Democrats of 30 years ago would have been all for Bush.

Libs blast Reagan as well, Here is a news flash for you, "Trickle Down Economics" was written by JFK. And Teddy pushed it through.

DO YOUR HOMEWORK, OR GO AWAY.
 
Nope, last I checked the contiguous 48 were still here and so are Hawaii and Alaska. Tomorrow I'll check on PR, but I think it is still there as well. No divide as far as I can see.

FJ
 
Whatever you believe......no matter how stupid.......just put it in perspective. Would you send YOUR KID? I say, let's gather up all you little cheerleader's kids and send them out there to get THEIR heads blown off. Then we'll talk about a worthy war. Let's get Osama....what the heck are we doing with Sadam? (something tells me that if YOUR children were the ones getting buried, you may change your minds about the validity of this "war")
 
WatchYourElbows said:
No YOU missed the post. This administration has divided this country. If you don't see it, then you aren't paying attention. Regardless of what side any of us is on, this puts us in horrible danger. This country is more divided than I've ever seen it. What about you?

This has been happening since 1994 when the Dems lost the house and Senate. They have been trying the divide and concur ever since. They became totally unhinged in 2000, when Bush one, and it is just getting nuttier and nuttier. Bush is a very moderate president, and most of the Rep in the house and senate are as well. The Dem. party only has its fringe groups supporting it, and forcing hate speech against America and the Rep.

I am a RUSH conservative, and by that standard, Bush is not a conservative by the strict definition.

Mark
 
WatchYourElbows said:
Does the ticket STATE the dress code?

Yes, actually, it does. The ticket states that it's subject to Southwest's Contract of Carriage. Here's the relevant excerpt:


10. Refusal to Transport (Issued July 12, 2005; Effective July 12, 2005)
Carrier will refuse to transport, or will remove from an aircraft at any point, any passenger in the following circumstances:
...
F. Comfort and Safety - Carrier may refuse to transport or remove from the aircraft at any point any passenger in the following categories as may be necessary for the comfort or safety of such passenger or other passengers:
...
(1) Persons whose conduct is or has been known to be disorderly, abusive, offensive, threatening, intimidating, or violent, or whose clothing is lewd, obscene, or patently offensive.


The carrier simply enforced the contract, and I applaud them for doing it.


And could you political types Please take your political bickering to another thread? Thanks.
 
WatchYourElbows said:
Whatever you believe......no matter how stupid.......just put it in perspective. Would you send YOUR KID? I say, let's gather up all you little cheerleader's kids and send them out there to get THEIR heads blown off. Then we'll talk about a worthy war. Let's get Osama....what the heck are we doing with Sadam? (something tells me that if YOUR children were the ones getting buried, you may change your minds about the validity of this "war")

YES, I would send my kid, and myself if need be, you coward?

This is the differance, I would step up to the plate, you hide behind it. I would die for my country, you would push me out front, before yourself. I would die to ensure you way of life. You would submit and give it all away, let what so many have fought and died for get destroyed. ME ME ME ME ME. If you put that in front of what you say, it all makes sense.

I could think of no better honor then dying for the United States, and joining the ranks of the many that have.

People like you have ridden off the backs of people like us your whole lives. In Iraq, your posts would have been monitored and you would have been taking in for "Conditoning".
 
WatchYourElbows said:
Whatever you believe......no matter how stupid.......just put it in perspective. Would you send YOUR KID? I say, let's gather up all you little cheerleader's kids and send them out there to get THEIR heads blown off. Then we'll talk about a worthy war. Let's get Osama....what the heck are we doing with Sadam? (something tells me that if YOUR children were the ones getting buried, you may change your minds about the validity of this "war")

SURPRISE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IT IS A VOLUNTARY MILITARY. NOBODY HAD TO JOIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

THEY ARE THE BRAVE PEOPLE THAT BELIEVE IN AMERICA AND PRESERVING IT.

******COWARD.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
WatchYourElbows said:
I would NEVER allow my kid to go to war (sorta like our current president) HAHA AWOL W!!!!!

Like CLinton, seems he missed out of any of the 12 years of the Vietnam war, while he was studing for 10 years, and smoking pot, but he did not inhale.

Your arguments are moot.
 
Watchyourelbows,

I have asked a few times but it seems you are too stupid to answer direct questions.

If you want any sort of credibility how about you start from page one of this thread and answer all the questions I have asked of you. They are not hard. That is of course is you are not a ********fool which you have come across in all of your posts.

Learn how to back up your ridiculous posts with some sort of facts and logic or continue to be viewed as a fool.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
WatchYourElbows said:
Not a liberal. Just an informed (ie - not a sheep) citizen. Proud (ok, not anymore) Republican.

Actually you are probably the most uninformed liberal dumba$$ that I have ever come across on flightinfo.com. You are a sheep that is spouting the views of the far left and can't even think for yourself. You have been challenged on your views several times (many times by me) and you wont even repsond to direct questions.

Answer the questions I have asked of you, or continue to be viewed as a fool.
 
I would be pissed off no matter what my political stance. I dont want my kids asking me whats Fuckers means. freedom of speech is one thing but you wouldnt want someone with porno pics of naked people on their shirt either. Let her walk.
 
Superpilot92 said:
I would be pissed off no matter what my political stance. I dont want my kids asking me whats Frickers means. freedom of speech is one thing but you wouldnt want someone with porno pics of naked people on their shirt either. Let her walk.

Exactly. Very well stated.
 
vetteracer said:
Your missing the entire point, if it said Fu$% the Clintons, she would have been asked to leave as well.

You libs are all the same, if it offends you then by all means throw down the house, if it does not offend you, or you aggree with it, then it must be the truth and FU** everyone else, and their rights.


CAN I GET AN AMEN!!!!!!
 
vetteracer said:
Goes to show the low level of your understanding of forign affairs?

WHO DO YOU THINK FUNDED OSAMA??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

"Sound of Crickets"

You are so out of touch with reality.

2000 soldiers is nothing compared to the WW 2. AND GUESS WHAT THE GERMANS DID NOT ATTACK US?????????

FDR led us into that war, and for good reason, and he was a Liberal.

You libs are always on the wrong side of history. History has proven that ove the last 100 years. Wake up, and get an education in history. Democrats of 30 years ago would have been all for Bush.

Libs blast Reagan as well, Here is a news flash for you, "Trickle Down Economics" was written by JFK. And Teddy pushed it through.

DO YOUR HOMEWORK, OR GO AWAY.


ONE MORE TIME, HOW ABOUT AN AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
vetteracer said:
YES, I would send my kid, and myself if need be, you coward?

This is the differance, I would step up to the plate, you hide behind it. I would die for my country, you would push me out front, before yourself. I would die to ensure you way of life. You would submit and give it all away, let what so many have fought and died for get destroyed. ME ME ME ME ME. If you put that in front of what you say, it all makes sense.

I could think of no better honor then dying for the United States, and joining the ranks of the many that have.

People like you have ridden off the backs of people like us your whole lives. In Iraq, your posts would have been monitored and you would have been taking in for "Conditoning".

Then what are you waiting for? I am sure the nearest MEPS station is not far away. The military needs you now more than ever so put your money where your mouth is.
 
this thread rules



GO W!!!

Problem is that this country isnt Christian anymore..this is a fight between the people of non faith and those that have it..and that is why we are in such trouble if the left gets a hold of power! I believe in leaders that have strong faith and convictions.
 
WatchYourElbows said:
We are at WAR????? AYFKM????? We started THAT war. We need to be in Afghanistan or at least Saudi Arabia. But Iraq? What will they call this war in history? The Oil War? The Vengence for Daddy War? I swear, you people should wear lil' sheep masks for halloween. Bahhhhh.

You conveniently forget that MR Saddam was shooting at our pilots on a nearly daily basis while we were enforcing UN sanctions over southern Iraq. This is in and of itself is an act of war. Saddam repeatedly and openly stated that his goal was to shoot down pilots enforcing the UN sanctions. The Clinton administration for the most part chose to ignore these "incidents". The UN as usual provided nothing but empty threats (and corrupt individuals willing to look the other way while Iraq sold oil, bought items banned by the UN sanctions and provided healthy kick-backs to select UN individuals).
President Bush saw that we were stuck in a never ending situation with the UN sanctions and enforcing the no-fly zones in Iraq. This motivated him to take necessary steps to put an end to it.
You also conviently forget this whole cycle started when Iraq invaded Kuwait.
 
Chuck Yogourt said:
Again, I don't know about a T-shirt but I do know of a White House intern and her stained dress.
I found a wad of bills once...
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by WatchYourElbows
Not a liberal. Just an informed (ie - not a sheep) citizen. Proud (ok, not anymore) Republican.


Actually you are probably the most uninformed liberal dumba$$ that I have ever come across on flightinfo.com. You are a sheep that is spouting the views of the far left and can't even think for yourself. You have been challenged on your views several times (many times by me) and you wont even repsond to direct questions.

Answer the questions I have asked of you, or continue to be viewed as a fool.

How is someone a liberal dumbass for asking why 2000 americans needlessly died in Iraq...Was if for WMD's? Oh, I know, it was so Iraq could install a Fundamentalist Islamic government... yeah, that was really worth it.

I love you hypicritical conservatives.... you are so angry at Hilliary for wanting Healthcare in our country for all kids... yet you see no problem at all when Bush spends hundreds of billions of dollars, (probably over a trillion when all is said and done.) in Iraq to build hospitals and such......You guys are sharp as tacks.
 
let me bet some of you on this board are in favor of Club Gitmo (club med ..for the terrorists) down in Cuba. While we are at it..lets be extra cruel and give them bottled water...:rolleyes:

Dont take over Iraq..yeah and we will just watch it grow to a terrorist hotbed..how people are so quick to forget 9/11..kinda sad
 
1.) Iraq wasn't a hotbed of terrorists until we invaded it...Saddam didn't like Al Quieda (He was a secularist they are religous fundamentalist muslims(remeber, he never was on TV wearing religous garments or such,or issuing fatwas, he was always wearing military suits or buisness suits), ...He thought they were threat to his regieme.
2.) What did Iraq have to do with 9/11? The 9/11 commission said Iraq had nothing do with 9/11.
In an interview, Paul Wolfowitz, deputy Defense secretary admitted Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11... I've provided the link and quote...
http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2003/tr20030801-depsecdef0526.html

Q: And when did you start to think that perhaps Iraq had something to do with it?
Wolfowitz: I’m not sure even now that I would say Iraq had something to do with it.

Also, here's BUSH ADMITING IRAQ HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH 9/11 with a link below:

“We have no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the September 11th attacks.”
~ George W. Bush
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/11/18/iraq/main584234.shtml

You idiots that keep trying to say Iraq had anything do to with 9/11.. sheesh.
-Where are all the WMD's we heard about?
-Why are 2000 of our troops dead when we were gonna be greated as 'liberators?'
-Why didn't Bush try to build a coalition like we had in 1991, with troops from more countries, including arab countries helping us..
-What was Bush's exit strategy? Even if you supported the war, aren't you appalled we are still there with no end in sight? Someone screwed up.. right? ...Even if you agree with the war, doesn't it make you mad we haven't caught Osama, the guy we should be after?
-Was it worth it to replace Saddam with a government run by religous fundamentalists- much like Iran?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom