Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Whats up with civi pilots?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
jetjockey1231 said:
bludevav8r - what - you did not like what i said?

Nope, it is flamebait...and has no rational basis for being a decent argument. Also shows your insecurity as an aviator. Your argument (or lack thereof), aside from being immature, is just weak. Period. And this is coming from a pure civilian aviator...a weenie RJ pilot at that.

-Neal
 
bludevav8r - you are absolutely right! you are a weenie RJ pilot. before you tell someone that they are insecure, you must first look in the mirror. First of all I was not replying to a thread that you had written and second how many ex mil pilots have youy flown with or do you know? it seems that maybe you wanted to be in the mil but was not accepted. on the other hand, i never applied and had no intention of being a mil pilot. this is the true definition of a real civ pilot.
 
If I got an immediate for a hard on demand 135 trip in a Lear or a Falcon, I certainly would prefer a 1500 hr civilian who had done all his flying as a civilian, rather than a 1500 hr "TopGun" who got the job because of his military background.

I need someone who I can tell where we’re going and have him run to the phone file a flight plan with Flight Service without having to break out with the god da_mn charts,,,so that we are ready to start engines in about 8 minutes after he picks up the phone.

I need someone who can quickly and correctly calculate T/O and landing weights and distances by glancing at a card almost instantly. In 135 on-demand freight, T/O and landing distances are computed to the foot.

When was the last time the NAVY or the USAF told you to land on a snow covered un-controlled 5000ft runway in a 26,000lbs jet with no reverse,,, with your only ground resource being "Fred" the fork-lift/ truck driver giving you braking action reports from the radio in his truck?

We don’t have 10,000 ft runways all the time or a tail hook to stop us. We don't have the "nylon let-down" either. If we are wrong in our decisions,,,we're fu_cked.

With a freight 135 trip in a jet I need someone who can set up and brief an NDB approach in about 1 minute (and know how to time it correctly and call out MDA's).

I need someone who can work antiquated radar unites. I need someone who can hand fly a jet at high altitudes (370 for the Falcon, 410 for the Lear) with-out an auto-pilot (this is where everyone fails), so we can get up to an altitude where we have a fighting chance of completing the trip without running out of gas (we can't "hook-up" with a tanker in the real world either).

And before you fighter guys chime in I guarantee you it will take plenty of time for you to hold altitude at 410 in a 20 series Learjet with-out an auto-pilot.

I need someone who knows how to pick their way thru a thunderstorm without going 150 miles out of the way to get around it.

I need someone that will keep his cool and won't say dumb sh1t on the radio when something quits working on the aircraft.

These are actual things I encountered while flying out of YIP with ex-military guys. Granted the FO's were new at the time, but they were not ready for the trips, in my opinion.

When I think of flying a single seat fighter with a tail hook, an ejection seat, in-flight refueling capability, and enough power to make the wing an after-thought, I think of relief.
 
jetjockey1231 said:
on the other hand, i never applied and had no intention of being a mil pilot. this is the true definition of a real civ pilot.

Haha -- good one, brother. Tell us another.
 
WillowRunVortex said:
If I got an immediate for a hard on demand 135 trip in a Lear or a Falcon, I certainly would prefer a 1500 hr civilian who had done all his flying as a civilian, rather than a 1500 hr "TopGun" who got the job because of his military background.

I need someone who I can tell where we’re going and have him run to the phone file a flight plan with Flight Service without having to break out with the god da_mn charts,,,so that we are ready to start engines in about 8 minutes after he picks up the phone.

I need someone who can quickly and correctly calculate T/O and landing weights and distances by glancing at a card almost instantly. In 135 on-demand freight, T/O and landing distances are computed to the foot.

When was the last time the NAVY or the USAF told you to land on a snow covered un-controlled 5000ft runway in a 26,000lbs jet with no reverse,,, with your only ground resource being "Fred" the fork-lift/ truck driver giving you braking action reports from the radio in his truck?

We don’t have 10,000 ft runways all the time or a tail hook to stop us. We don't have the "nylon let-down" either. If we are wrong in our decisions,,,we're fu_cked.

With a freight 135 trip in a jet I need someone who can set up and brief an NDB approach in about 1 minute (and know how to time it correctly and call out MDA's).

I need someone who can work antiquated radar unites. I need someone who can hand fly a jet at high altitudes (370 for the Falcon, 410 for the Lear) with-out an auto-pilot (this is where everyone fails), so we can get up to an altitude where we have a fighting chance of completing the trip without running out of gas (we can't "hook-up" with a tanker in the real world either).

And before you fighter guys chime in I guarantee you it will take plenty of time for you to hold altitude at 410 in a 20 series Learjet with-out an auto-pilot.

I need someone who knows how to pick their way thru a thunderstorm without going 150 miles out of the way to get around it.

I need someone that will keep his cool and won't say dumb sh1t on the radio when something quits working on the aircraft.

These are actual things I encountered while flying out of YIP with ex-military guys. Granted the FO's were new at the time, but they were not ready for the trips, in my opinion.

When I think of flying a single seat fighter with a tail hook, an ejection seat, in-flight refueling capability, and enough power to make the wing an after-thought, I think of relief.

After reading your post, I promptly got on my knees and kowtow-ed so hard I broke my nose. Thank you for your enlightened, fully-informed, hands-down-the-best-I-ever-read post. You've obviously read this entire thread and have, therefore, not opened any possibility of others thinking you to be a complete dumbsh!t. Thank you.
 
I'm considering being the ultimate narcissist and quoting MYSELF in my signature line:

Fury220 said:
Nuthin but love both ways for you guys. Notice, I don't comment much about what you guys do. Why? Well, my knowledge base is small when it comes to your job. I respect the guys on the other side of the fence who do the same.



I think this thread will go down in FI history as being one of the "Top 10 of 2006." Laugh-a-thon all the way. :)
 
WillowRunVortex said:
If I got an immediate for a hard on demand 135 trip in a Lear or a Falcon, I certainly would prefer a 1500 hr civilian who had done all his flying as a civilian, rather than a 1500 hr "TopGun" who got the job because of his military background.

I need someone who I can tell where we’re going and have him run to the phone file a flight plan with Flight Service without having to break out with the god da_mn charts,,,so that we are ready to start engines in about 8 minutes after he picks up the phone.

I need someone who can quickly and correctly calculate T/O and landing weights and distances by glancing at a card almost instantly. In 135 on-demand freight, T/O and landing distances are computed to the foot.

When was the last time the NAVY or the USAF told you to land on a snow covered un-controlled 5000ft runway in a 26,000lbs jet with no reverse,,, with your only ground resource being "Fred" the fork-lift/ truck driver giving you braking action reports from the radio in his truck?

We don’t have 10,000 ft runways all the time or a tail hook to stop us. We don't have the "nylon let-down" either. If we are wrong in our decisions,,,we're fu_cked.

With a freight 135 trip in a jet I need someone who can set up and brief an NDB approach in about 1 minute (and know how to time it correctly and call out MDA's).

I need someone who can work antiquated radar unites. I need someone who can hand fly a jet at high altitudes (370 for the Falcon, 410 for the Lear) with-out an auto-pilot (this is where everyone fails), so we can get up to an altitude where we have a fighting chance of completing the trip without running out of gas (we can't "hook-up" with a tanker in the real world either).

And before you fighter guys chime in I guarantee you it will take plenty of time for you to hold altitude at 410 in a 20 series Learjet with-out an auto-pilot.

I need someone who knows how to pick their way thru a thunderstorm without going 150 miles out of the way to get around it.

I need someone that will keep his cool and won't say dumb sh1t on the radio when something quits working on the aircraft.

These are actual things I encountered while flying out of YIP with ex-military guys. Granted the FO's were new at the time, but they were not ready for the trips, in my opinion.

When I think of flying a single seat fighter with a tail hook, an ejection seat, in-flight refueling capability, and enough power to make the wing an after-thought, I think of relief.

I need someone, I need someone..........
You know there are guys that do all that by themselves???
Seriously, thats all pretty laughable.
Hold altitude @ 410 w/o auto-pilot?? Yeah, pretty much every Naval Aviator has done that from the back of a T-45 without the help of the HUD. (Guess there's no auto in the -38 for the AF types, but I really don't know) A tailhook and Inflight Refueling as a relief?!?!? Buddy, I don't care how many "slippery, short and uncontrolled" airports you've landed at, you have no idea what the heck you're talking about. None. None at all.
 
guppygoshawk said:
I need someone, I need someone..........
You know there are guys that do all that by themselves???
Seriously, thats all pretty laughable.
Hold altitude @ 410 w/o auto-pilot?? Yeah, pretty much every Naval Aviator has done that from the back of a T-45 without the help of the HUD. (Guess there's no auto in the -38 for the AF types, but I really don't know) A tailhook and Inflight Refueling as a relief?!?!? Buddy, I don't care how many "slippery, short and uncontrolled" airports you've landed at, you have no idea what the heck you're talking about. None. None at all.

No altitude hold on a -38 either. Oh, and I somehow manage to hold 410 while I talk on the radio, instruct, and navigate at the same time (while the SA black hole in the rear 'pit is literally trying to fly himself out of a canvas bag...literally). I never thought it to be that hard (sts) until WillowRun informed me otherwise. I'm sure he's doing it all at .9 IMN too. :)


Again...please...talking out of your stinky hole is funny, but still ill-advised.

Peace! :)
 
Fury220 said:
Again...please...talking out of your stinky hole is funny, but still ill-advised.

Peace! :)

Personal experience, thats all. I guess I flew with the "bad apples"

Edit 1: The ones that couldn't fly their thumbs up their asses.:)
 
Last edited:
jetjockey1231 said:
bludevav8r - you are absolutely right! you are a weenie RJ pilot.

It is called self-deprecating humor...look it up sometime.

jetjockey1231 said:
before you tell someone that they are insecure, you must first look in the mirror. First of all I was not replying to a thread that you had written and second how many ex mil pilots have youy flown with or do you know? it seems that maybe you wanted to be in the mil but was not accepted. on the other hand, i never applied and had no intention of being a mil pilot. this is the true definition of a real civ pilot.

I have flown with many ex-military pilots...both as their FO and now as their Captain. You build this big wall between civilian and military (or wannabe military) pilots...why? I am not a "true" civilian pilot because I applied to be an F-16 pilot in the Guard (and by the way, had 600 hours of untrue civilian time and a CFI/MEI at the time)? Give me a break dude. You must be a joy to fly with...

-Weenie RJ Pilot (and if I can ever get hired to fly a Boeing I will be a weenie Boeing pilot...just for you)
 

Latest resources

Back
Top