Our MEC, that often has internal strife over residual issues from the last merger, was unanimous in saying "no way" to DALPA's last SLI position.
Interersting. Residual internal strife, the product of an arbitrated award. AAA/AWA also have strife, the product of an arbitrated award. Yet we Delta pilots have integrated PAA pilots and Western pilots without that internal strife. The product of a negotiated awards.
You said "no way" to the option afforded by the transaction framework agreement. That's cool. We respect that. Move on. We did, and we crafted an LOA with our own leverage.
Moak categorically rejected expedited arbitration.
What is expedited arbitration? Where is it defined? Is it in our contract? Is it in yours? Why should we? Why should you? Isn't arbitration for losers?
Sorry, but that speaks volumes.
It speaks volumes about an MEC with common sense, that is not afraid to negotiate an award and stand by it.
ALPA merger policy has its procedures for a reason. It's in our contract, since we were unable to capture the value pre announcement of the merger, as outlined in the transaction framework agreement, we have ALPA policy. Let's follow that path. Hopefully to a negotiated outcome.
I'll concede you guys have had your talking points and PR down from day one, but it's not going to be decided here or in the press.
We have been focused and prepared since day one. We weren't going to lose an opportunity to capture value due to an inability of our respective MECs to reach a negotiated result on SLI.
Ultimately you will come to the same conclusion we have, that the road forward is to enter into joint contract negotiations. The sooner the better. If you pretend there is no timeline to capture value, like you did with the TFA, you'll be left out in the cold again. That's not a threat, that's reality. Believe it or not, the whole world doesn't stop and wait for you to make a decision.