Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

West Air and SKYW?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
There are two sides to every issue - unions included

You CLEARLY haven't been in this business long enough to understand that for every union protection you receive in your contract you give up something in negotiations for the next one. Or perhaps you do. It's not really for me to divine but the kind of one-sided rhetoric you put forth is due for an extreme makeover.

Now, before you bash me as an anti-unionist, understand that I became an ALPA member in 1990 and remained so as long as they would let me stay - WES went under in quite a while ago. I was vehemently in favor of their activities from the day I walked on to the property there - the climate was ripe for abuse. ALPA fought and WON a grievance filed on my behalf that restored my seniority after it was lost in the NPA general system bid I described earlier. That, in turn, allowed me to be trained in the aircraft that was correct for my seniority - which was worth a bit more money.

Our contract provided pathways of communication between the pilots and the company that were,once established mandated by federal law. In other words, the company HAD to listen. Distinct rules about successorship, training, duy rigs, trip rigs, reductions in force, company paid move when displacement occurred were just a few of the benefits we got from our dues.

But you try asking ANYONE who was a TWA employee where ALPA was for them! They won't sing such a sweet song. Unions aren't for all companies but they will come if the company fails to listen and respond with care when concerns are raised by potential collective bargaining converts.

I will not try to claim that the current market just won't support the wages of yesteryear - it might. But the company paying those wages has got to be profitable to do so. No, what the market won't support is the corporate structure of the companies that people often point the finger of woe at when discussing the declining state of the industry. All you have to do to see proof of this is look at who's making money - three of the four biggest money makers are union shops - UPS, FedEx, and Southwest. JetBlue hasn't got a union yet but they will in time.

I believe it is likely that United will not survive this episode - at least not in its present form. I think American and Delta have a ways to go yet before they're out, despite predictions of doom and gloom everywhere. After all they're not in bankruptcy - yet. I don't believe that any of this has to do exclusively with pilot salaries but what are you going to pay those salaries with if you just spent your last nickel on fuel for your 747? It all has to do with the way these companies opererate and the remendous burden of corporate bureacracy that they must shoulder.

I've been out of the union thing for a few years now and you know what? For me that's a good thing. I could whip out my contract with the best of 'em - even showed managment a thing or two about the English language as I read it to them over the phone when they were trying to extend my duty day.

Went through a negotiation too. Have you done that one yet? Not to be missed, my friend. Not to be missed. Your blood pressure will be 40 points higher ALL THE TIME. What a wonderful benefit your union provides for you! Know what else? They'll provide it every three to five years just so you know they're doing everything they can for you. They have huge reservoirs of venom, rumors, and vitriolic rhetoric stockpiled and ready for use like a weapon of mass destruction at the negotiation table. Sorry, but that's just not what I need after an evening out with the wife at the local Italian joint. They don't manufacture enough Tums for that. The fun of having your life peeled away from reality and turned upside down on that kind of a regularly scheduled basis is just not what I need. Some thrive on it though!

Remember that seniority thing I mentioned earlier? That sure helped out - the extra money and all. Problem was I was held out of seat and type for NINE MONTHS while the grievance ran its course and was owed about $2200.00 in retroactive pay differential (per the contract). The MEC chairman personally helped me understand why I wouldn't be receiving it. "Son," he said, "You got your airplane. Don't you think ALPA has done enough for you?" I guess he was right. What possible good could $2200.00 OF MY OWN MONEY have done me?

Now I know all this sure seems like I'm pretty bitter about unions but the fact is that I'm not. They did get me that seat and I did start making better money on the spot. It did improve my quality of life and it did help me learn what I needed to know to do what I do now. It's just that when I see someone raving in a way that would make Hoffa proud I just know from experience that there's more to the program than union rhetoric and propaganda. I know there can be more to a career in aviation than fumbling through my flight bag looking for that tattered, well worn contract document.

The phrase, "Be careful what you wish because you just might get it," is especially applicable to almost ANY union related matter. It's important to keep in mind that unions are run by politicians of a sort. Politicians have an agenda - ALWAYS. That agenda is not always on your side, whether you realize it or not.

TIS
 
Hey Truckdriver,

US Airways ALPA just offered to "lower the bar" by some 12 %, no doubt Delta will be next. In your infinite wisdom, what do you say to those guys?

It seems you've heard the rumors that SKW is looking to buy someone and you're running scared. In the SunAire buyout, the SunAire guys ended up relatively better seniority than the SKW pilots, (BTW that will not happen again) and Westair was run into the ground by its own management, SKW had nothing to do with that.

's all good.
 
EAP said:
AnimalTale, I take exception to the fact that no Yonited guys protested the non-union communter flying takeover. In fact, United SFO council 34 passed several, and I mean several UNANIMOUS motions protesting the fact that United feed was going to go to a non union carrier that had SEVERAL times voted to be not represented by a union. What does a motion do? Well, ALPA cannot make UAL leadership completely turn about face on a decision like this, but it does make subtle changes to the direction. For instance, I know several guys that were interviewed and hired preferentially, as the result of these motions.
I apologize. I just never ever heard any sympathy from any UAL pilot. Nor did they mention about their motions in SFO.
 
Truckdriver said:
embdrvr,

No I was never turned down for anything at SKYW. I never even applied or dreamed of applying because they are a non-union carrier that has consistently shown it is in favor of staying non-union. Never wanted to work there, will never want to work there, and the reason I started this post is because I hope I never work for a carrier that has assets thaty SKYW wants. At this point in my career I worry a little about that when listening to Jerry at investor confereneces.

I beleive in unity as a PROFESSION not soley a company. I know that staying non-union may have been better for some as a COMPANY. Unity as a profession is the only thing that will keep this career what it should be. If you want a career as an airline pilot to be a lower-middle class career then that's fine. Without unity that is where it is going. Unity, Unity, Unity, anything less than that will fail US as pilots. And yes, I said US.
Truckdriver, you seem to have chaged your tune a bit as of late...

A search of your previous post with respect to the SkyWest union drive shows some thoughts to be slightly less than cheerleading the union cause:

"If you guys can get what you want as a pilot group without a union, all the more power to ya."


"Unionizing is a VERY serious decision to make and one that should not be taken lightly. Unfortunatley, many peoeple will take it lightly and not realize the impact it will have on their job. I work for an ALPA carrier and see BOTH the good and bad that a union brings to a pilot group. In a perfect world we wouldn't need ALPA and I could spend my 1.95% on aluminum wheels and chrome for my sweet 97 Saturn."

So why the gung-ho attitude now? You seemed before to be more understanding that things may work different here and that that might be a good thing.
 
BTW, as to your original question as to SkyWest's involvement in the demise of WestAir, TIS and others there at the time have presented a detailed history of how there was none. That story is all about J.O. and MESA (a ALPA carrier), and not about SkyWest.

SkyWest, in its dealings with companies it has merged with or with groups it has taken on has provided growth and opportunity for those pilots, sometimes pulling them from the wreckage of a failed union carrier. Talk to any ex WestAir guys flying here now: You'll get a slightly different perspective from your own or the message ALPA presents of itself.

The great question regarding quality of life is not about a union, it is about the pilot group/management relationship, organised or not...
 
Now that I've wasted my time reading through all this SKYW bashing, I don't have time to verify this. Regarding the SkyWest/SunAire buyout, as of tomorrow (Earl Snow is retiring), isn't the number one guy on our seniority list an ex-SunAire guy? Someone inferred in a post that the SunAire guys were stapled to our list (I could be wrong, or just read it wrong). Not true. I've looked at that list and it looked to me like there was a seniority list merger, but I don't remember what it was based on.


Yo, PBR..........how's Odie? Nice pic (avatar)

AF :cool:
 
ArticFlyer,


As I said in my previous post, the SunAire guys ended up with better relative seniority than the Skywest guys. I don't know how they arrived at it, but it was a hodgepodge, 1 for 1, then 2 for 1, then date of hire. I don't think many of the SKW guys were happy with it.
 
TIS said:
You CLEARLY haven't been in this business long enough to understand that for every union protection you receive in your contract you give up something in negotiations for the next one. TIS
I've worked for an ALPA carrier now for 4 years so I am relativley new to the whole deal. My dad retires next year from an ALPA carrier and my grandfather retired from an ALPA carrier. I have not personally been through a full negotiation process yet but beleive me, I know what they are and how they effect families. I also have an uncle and two cousins who work for unionized carriers (One of which is a SCAB). You could learn more at a family reuinion with these guys than you will learn in a lifetime on these boards. If I ever dreamed of working at SKYW I would have been banished to the little kid table with my SCAB cousin at the family reuinion:).
 
Truckdriver,


Just so I'm clear on this........you won't take any job unless it's labor group is organized? And, because we are non-union, we are equated with scabs in your family's book? If that's the case, note the comment that VP Cheney had for Senator Pat Leahy and apply that to you and your family.

SSDD,

My comments above weren't directed at you. Someone else implied that the SunAire guys were stapled. Just wanted to clear that up. I'll have to ask Tony H. how the lists were merged. He told me once, but I've only got three brain cells left. One is AWOL and the other two are on SAR trying to find it.

AF :cool:
 
Last edited:
Arctic Flyer,


Never meant the SCAB thing to be implied to SKYW. There is no way I would ever include any pilot over there in that group unless they truly met the definition. Only those special people can have that designation. If it came across that way I apologize. Now if you fly someone's struck work??? Just kidding!!!! I've hijacked my own post too many times now so I won't even go there.
 
<exeunt>

Used as a stage direction to indicate that two or more performers leave the stage.
 
Truckdriver said:
If I ever dreamed of working at SKYW I would have been banished to the little kid table with my SCAB cousin at the family reuinion:).
Something tells me noone at SkyWest regrets your employment elsewhere.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top