BuckMurdock1
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 2, 2003
- Posts
- 476
Our word is our bond!Sir, Those are IOUs. 250 thou..might want to hold onto that one
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Our word is our bond!Sir, Those are IOUs. 250 thou..might want to hold onto that one
They will then set a lower hour cap on the lines.What happens if they don't get enough takers on the voluntary leave offers?
with 82 mil said:Or Rebel Investor....Yep I will take that guy, but we already have him!
Spirit just received alot of good press.....their model seems to work..
40% of revenues from fees.....just like allegiant, if they relied solely on RPMs then they would not be as well off either..
this article to me says it is time to rethink your plan......
i could see a merger with spirit but the the brands are so non compatible, i quickly say ,that wouldn't work....
with 82 mil, they need and angel investor.
Sir, Those are IOUs. 250 thou..might want to hold onto that one
I don't think the business plan needs to be reworked, but I do think the route structure needs to be reworked. There have been many missteps and poorly thought out routes. For an airline that is trying to build a following in the California business market to announce consecutive expansions into markets like Cancun, Los Cabos, Puerto Vallarta and Palm Springs, while ignoring places like PHX and DEN is not very smart IMHO. A few years ago the CEO put up a graphic of the most heavily traveled business markets from SFO and LAX and stated that those would be the markets we would be going after. Instead we spent a year going after the specialty leisure markets.
Another giant misstep IMHO was announcing YYZ. Everyone knows that from California YVR is the big market, particularly from LAX. Instead the CEO "went with his gut" and decided to try YYZ.
Agreed about CFO. They pulled out of SNA because the financials just weren't there. The matured routes are profitable, and the new entrant markets are projected to be profitable in another 12 months or less.You can add hiring CFO Peter Hunt as another bad move. Don't think that's going to work out too well.
Pulling out of SNA was probably questionable too. I don't see how you don't make money in SNA, it's on the trees there.
How's that drunk Randy Babbit thing coming along? I heard he's gonna be the new VP of Employee Relations? That should go well. If there are pi$$ed off Airtran pilots and SWA FOs, they can always join him for a drink! Oh and make sure there's a designated driver.
How's that drunk Randy Babbit thing coming along? I heard he's gonna be the new VP of Employee Relations? That should go well. If there are pi$$ed off Airtran pilots and SWA FOs, they can always join him for a drink! Oh and make sure there's a designated driver.
hey NE
the story said they have much competition of every route they fly.....so they think the leisure traveler is the way to go?
if you commit to something you have to give it time to work..
how about raising prices?
if you do and your product is better, then they will pay for it.
when i read Baldanza's of spirit airlines comment about their creed, i get the spirit manifesto now....they want to be the LOW price airline, 25% below everybody on base price..
the experts know that people respond to a number even if you whack them with add ons....car salesman made this techinque famous,
Ne Dude is almost as delusional as the senior check airman that was on our jumpseat a few months back from VA.. He told stories of executive meetings regarding the unlimited revenue potentials, back door revenue funneling into massive future growth even told tales of check airman meetings regarding the addition of the A330 and how it was a " Done Deal" with the manuals being rewritten.
This guy was obviously sniffing glue