PositiveRate
Refugee
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2002
- Posts
- 728
The east pilots had the chance to participate and craft the decision. In fact the arbitrator pleaded with them to modify their stance, but they refused. When they cling to an unreasonable position, how can they expect any decision to pass their "fairness" test.
How "fair" is it for one faction of the pilot group to make another portion suffer the loss of their ALPA protections, just so that they can prove a point?
How about responsible?
How about honorable?
How about trustworthy?
I see the scab word is getting under your skin. The above quote is eating at me in a similar fashion. Seems none of you want to respond. Care to respond?